PDA

View Full Version : Most Wanted Aircraft In Pacific Fighters



darkhorizon11
04-08-2005, 10:44 PM

VW-IceFire
04-08-2005, 10:47 PM
Dejavu...

VF51_Flatspin
04-08-2005, 11:09 PM
If they're planes "THAT WE ARE GETTING"...why does Oleg need to 'make sure [they] are in the next patch'??

Seems a mutually exclusive argument to me.

darkhorizon11
04-09-2005, 12:53 AM
Well these were the ones everybody wanted most but some in the other polls were WIP. I was just curious. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif

darkhorizon11
04-09-2005, 08:53 PM
Just a lil' bump! http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

BanaBob
04-09-2005, 09:04 PM
AVENGER

Jaws43
04-10-2005, 02:30 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by BanaBob:
_AVENGER_ <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Yes that is the one I like to see flyable http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/25.gif

fordfan25
04-10-2005, 03:39 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Jaws43:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by BanaBob:
_AVENGER_ <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Yes that is the one I like to see flyable http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/25.gif <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

yep me to. the sbd is geting very old for me. i swear i can get out flap my arms and get to target faster lol. ofcourse a -4 hog would be a nice consalation prize heheheh.

Feathered_IV
04-10-2005, 03:48 AM
More Japanese Naval aircraft than just the two that we have now. Surely that can't be too much to ask?

EnGaurde
04-10-2005, 07:17 AM
more japanese aircraft all up, really.

its so painful to see, that the greatest difficulty is dished up by the **** yankee legal system, admittedly being exploited.

and on some maps you cant move but for american aircraft.

bet japanese manufacturers wouldnt bother with legalese.

such is the demand, unfortunately.... everyone wants to fly a mustang, nobody has even heard of a ki-100, yet scream for a perfectly accurate simulation....

http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-sad.gif

IV_JG51_Razor
04-10-2005, 08:57 AM
What BanaBob said...AVENGER!!

VF51_Flatspin
04-10-2005, 04:30 PM
Tom Waits is The MASTER!

Stanger_361st
04-10-2005, 04:41 PM
How do you spell relief.

AVENGER

BanaBob
04-10-2005, 04:48 PM
I change my mind, I'd now like the AVENGER as flyable. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_cool.gif

raisen
04-10-2005, 05:30 PM
To begin with, I'd like to see the G4M that Ubi advertised in our market http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif The world works in mysterious ways though, and for whatever reason it couldn't be done.... If it can be supplied now that'll be excellent news.... But I've always been a fan of twins generally, so the Mossies (especially the FB VI - rugged, firepower, bombs, and handsome.... its got it all) making an eventual appearance, accompanied by a Ju88 will be much appreciated. I don't anticipate seeing many Ju88's, or G4M's online in any numbers unless people start to swing away from unstructured "quakebirds" style play.

Raisen

Philipscdrw
04-10-2005, 06:32 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by EnGaurde:
bet japanese manufacturers wouldnt bother with legalese.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Perhaps they don't want to associate themselves with WW2?

p1ngu666
04-10-2005, 06:44 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Philipscdrw:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by EnGaurde:
bet japanese manufacturers wouldnt bother with legalese.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Perhaps they don't want to associate themselves with WW2? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

some have restored planes and things, imo its a shame more of japanease stuff wasnt yoinked and put in museums or stored...

and no offense, but im getting fed up of every other person asking or demanding american planes, theres a fairly good selection now.
japanease have 5 plane types. italiens two, brits two plus some halfish ones.
everyone lacks a carrier torp plane http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-tongue.gif

ill now get flamed i bet http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif

raisen
04-10-2005, 06:57 PM
You might get flamed, but you'd still be right Pingu....

Raisen

darkhorizon11
04-10-2005, 08:05 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by p1ngu666:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Philipscdrw:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by EnGaurde:
bet japanese manufacturers wouldnt bother with legalese.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Perhaps they don't want to associate themselves with WW2? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

some have restored planes and things, imo its a shame more of japanease stuff wasnt yoinked and put in museums or stored...

and no offense, but im getting fed up of every other person asking or demanding american planes, theres a fairly good selection now.
japanease have 5 plane types. italiens two, brits two plus some halfish ones.
everyone lacks a carrier torp plane http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-tongue.gif

ill now get flamed i bet http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

No its true I love American planes and I'll admit we are spoiled. But if it makes you feel better we may be NEVER seeing US aircraft again.

Oilburner_TAW
04-10-2005, 08:08 PM
Avenger!

jarink
04-10-2005, 08:20 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by p1ngu666:
japanease have 5 plane types. italiens two, brits two plus some halfish ones.
everyone lacks a carrier torp plane http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-tongue.gif

ill now get flamed i bet http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Not a flame, but maybe a correction? http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

The brits have several different marks of Spitfire/Seafire available(something like 12?), plus 2 Hurricanes (3 if you include the Axis Mk I), Beaufighter, plus the halfish ones (J8/Gladiator, B-239, the 3 marks of Corsair, 2 marks of Tomahawk) and a couple AI only (2 marks of Blenheim, Avenger).

Not too bad a list if you look at it, really. The Brits definietly have it better than the Japanese and Italians! About the only major gap is in heavy bombers.

shinden1974
04-10-2005, 08:42 PM
I think we'll see american planes in some sim someday, (anyone know if the guys making heroes of the pacific paid off grumman?) either because a large software company decides to take the companies on and win (unlikely, considering it will cost less to use option #2) or just pay the fees.
One thing for sure it, this pretty much kills any little company trying to bring in something new and innovative...Looks more like anti-capitalism to me...
I remember Oleg saying something about BOB being the first in a whole line covering the entire war, I wonder if he's willing to foot the bill (or Ubi) to bring in the US planes for that project, I guess it depends on how well BOB does.

p1ngu666
04-10-2005, 08:44 PM
hurri's arent to raf spec, beaufighter is porked, half cannon ammo, no armoured glass, no rear view, and its half aussi

gladiator, bleheim(ai) i was excluding ai. rest are lend lease...
yes we lack and a heavy, mossie IV will be our best bomber... not even the 4000lb cookie carrier http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-indifferent.gif

im not anti american planes, i fly them alot actully.

just fed up of all the posts for them...

p1ngu666
04-10-2005, 08:46 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by shinden1974:
I think we'll see american planes in some sim someday, (anyone know if the guys making heroes of the pacific paid off grumman?) either because a large software company decides to take the companies on and win (unlikely, considering it will cost less to use option #2) or just pay the fees.
One thing for sure it, this pretty much kills any little company trying to bring in something new and innovative...Looks more like anti-capitalism to me...
I remember Oleg saying something about BOB being the first in a whole line covering the entire war, I wonder if he's willing to foot the bill (or Ubi) to bring in the US planes for that project, I guess it depends on how well BOB does. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

i think it depends on the planes, and who made and now owns that company.
no blackwidow, and i helped 2 modders with that just a little bit, but i did help http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-sad.gif
and p47n tooo

shinden1974
04-10-2005, 09:05 PM
I'm pretty sure this question has already been asked, but I'm a noob here...

Does anyone know if the 'stop' modeling our planes' thing was just northrop-grumman? and how do the other companies (vought owned by the carlyle group, fairchild-republic...) feel about it?

Sharkey888
04-10-2005, 10:34 PM
Just don't put "Grumman" or any other company name on the next darned box!!

Spit14
04-11-2005, 03:24 AM
the italian fighters

darkhorizon11
04-12-2005, 11:00 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by shinden1974:
I'm pretty sure this question has already been asked, but I'm a noob here...

Does anyone know if the 'stop' modeling our planes' thing was just northrop-grumman? and how do the other companies (vought owned by the carlyle group, fairchild-republic...) feel about it? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Nobody is really talking. Especially not UBI, its pretty much all just speculation. But becareful with this topic mods often lock it.

bat05
04-12-2005, 07:03 PM
I vote for the Avenger. While systems have progressed to handle visual and temporal perfection, I still recall the special rush of approaching the enemy with an attitude and a torpedo as available thru the Pacific Air War 1942. In the case of Pacific Fighters the old saw re: never assuming --certainly holds true.(emphasis on "me").

Skyraider3D
04-17-2005, 03:38 AM
http://skyraider3d.military-meshes.com/images/Ju88T-1_wip04.jpg

http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_cool.gif

masaker2005
04-17-2005, 05:32 AM
Just one: <span class="ev_code_RED">B-17</span>G

Hussar13
04-17-2005, 05:41 AM
Add to the list: Swordfish, Kate and Devastator. I personally would love thes three Torpedo droppers as flyable a/c. Maybe also some other British carrier 'planes like the Fulmar which should be high up on the list...a great "forgotten" 'plane.

Pentallion
04-17-2005, 10:51 AM
What the heck kind of poll is this one?

Everyone knows the planes we all want the most are the torpedo bombers! Put them on the freaking poll or this is a meaningless poll. Sorry to be so direct, but that's the facts.

WOLFMondo
04-17-2005, 01:35 PM
I don't want a torpedo bomber, I want a Tempest V. Im sure you could put a Torpedo under one if you tried hard enough.

IL2-chuter
04-17-2005, 03:31 PM
I'd like to see some Swedish airplanes . . . http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-indifferent.gif

canucksledge
04-17-2005, 03:47 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by EnGaurde:
more japanese aircraft all up, really.

its so painful to see, that the greatest difficulty is dished up by the **** yankee legal system, admittedly being exploited.

and on some maps you cant move but for american aircraft.

bet japanese manufacturers wouldnt bother with legalese.

such is the demand, unfortunately.... everyone wants to fly a mustang, nobody has even heard of a ki-100, yet scream for a perfectly accurate simulation....

http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-sad.gif <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Even the Betty you keep telling me to stop whining about? : )

Geez buddy, you flip flop enough I'd vote for ya if you wanted to be Prime Minister of Canada...any day of the week.

raisen
04-17-2005, 04:35 PM
<snip/>No its true I love American planes and I'll admit we are spoiled. But if it makes you feel better we may be NEVER seeing US aircraft again.</snip>

...And that too would be a great shame Darkhorizon... Lawyers.... truly living proof of the lack of existance of a god.... http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

We could do with some more bombers generally I believe...

In what is supposed to be a pacific naval aviation sim, we could definately do with some more japanese aircraft in which to aviate, in a japanese fashion... IMHO

Raisen

darkhorizon11
04-17-2005, 04:55 PM
If this poll gets over 150 total votes or so I'll send the results to Oleg.

Tuba2004
04-17-2005, 08:06 PM
http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/heart.gif
150 votes? Well I certainly want to add my five votes for the AVENGER!!!!
http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/10.gifsurp::
Jim

JaggedRaven
04-17-2005, 09:58 PM
*sigh* As always...the B-17. Then again it would be refreshing to see the B-24 flyable for the first time in any game...too bad bombers require so much work to finish. Ooooh...and umm...the B-26 yeah, that would be great...and the short sunderland for the brits...and the emily for the Japanese...and the lancaster and the hamilton and the halifax....and the condor for the germans...and any other heavy or medium bomber ever produced for any side during World War Two...that would be great thanks! http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_razz.gif But seriously...make them. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

Silencer_42
04-17-2005, 10:26 PM
I would like one HEAVY bomber for each of the majour countries fighting. The russian one we have now is a joke to fly MP as your almost a sitting duck. (You are actually moving, slowly.)

I'm expecting/demanding http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif BOB to have the B-17 so my message isn't for PF. Please make sure BOB has a FLYABLE heavy (4 engine) bomber for at least both allies and axis.

Bearcat99
04-18-2005, 10:15 PM
Id have to go with an Avenger too.

Indianer.
04-19-2005, 01:52 AM
B17 http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

EnGaurde
04-19-2005, 02:24 AM
more Japanese anything.

Amen.

csThor
04-19-2005, 03:21 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Silencer_42:
I'm expecting/demanding http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif BOB to have the B-17 so my message isn't for PF. Please make sure BOB has a FLYABLE heavy (4 engine) bomber for at least both allies and axis. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

You are aware that "BoB" means the timeframe from July - November 1940 (if we're generous, that is) - a time when no real heavy bomber apart of TB-3 was in service in any mentionable numbers? Later - if Maddox Games chooses to model theaters where such planes operated in any numbers - it might be viable to add them, but definitely not for BoB.

BigMotor
04-19-2005, 09:02 AM
Avenger, please?

9th_Spitin
04-19-2005, 09:22 AM
http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/boeing2.jpg

No explanation needed.

F19_Olli72
04-19-2005, 10:24 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by p1ngu666:
and no offense, but im getting fed up of every other person asking or demanding american planes, theres a fairly good selection now.
japanease have 5 plane types. italiens two, brits two plus some halfish ones.
everyone lacks a carrier torp plane http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-tongue.gif

ill now get flamed i bet http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

No flames from me, cos i agree. Just look at the poles, they only got one. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-sad.gif Wonder why no modeller has been tempted to do the polish birds?, they're very http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_cool.gif

F19_Olli72
04-19-2005, 10:30 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by csThor:
You are aware that "BoB" means the timeframe from July - November 1940 (if we're generous, that is) - a time when _no_ real heavy bomber apart of TB-3 was in service in any mentionable numbers? Later - if Maddox Games chooses to model theaters where such planes operated in any numbers - it might be viable to add them, but definitely not for BoB. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Maybe not that 'heavy' (but not many were 1940) but at least its 4-engined: FW 200 Condor, operational from 8 april 1940 http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_cool.gif

p1ngu666
04-19-2005, 03:06 PM
http://premium1.uploadit.org/pingu666///lanc2.jpg

http://premium1.uploadit.org/pingu666///lanc7.jpg

oleg wants todo lanc in BOB http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif
best bomber of ww2 pretty much (b29 abit late, buggy)
taking nearly twice the bombload of a b17 to the same target. taking pretty much any bomb anyone could think up to target.
4 merlins
handles like a sportscar compaired to b17 http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-surprised.gif

DIRTY-MAC
04-19-2005, 06:46 PM
http://www.1000cp.org/***a***a/gallery/image/cw21b_14_11.jpg

LEXX_Luthor
04-19-2005, 08:19 PM
Flyable Ki~27

aipilotmarkone
04-19-2005, 08:35 PM
Ki-27 and A5M at least ai.

DIRTY-MAC, nice plane. CW-21B? Was a cockpit made?

csThor
04-19-2005, 11:53 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by F19_Olli72:
Maybe not that 'heavy' (but not many were 1940) but at least its 4-engined: FW 200 Condor, operational from 8 april 1940 http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_cool.gif <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

The Fw 200 was no heavy bomber but a passenger plane (mis)used as transport and long-range sea recon plane. Personally I see little use for this type in the BoB-timeframe.

EnGaurde
04-20-2005, 12:36 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> oleg wants todo lanc in BOB
best bomber of ww2 pretty much (b29 abit late, buggy)
taking nearly twice the bombload of a b17 to the same target. taking pretty much any bomb anyone could think up to target.
4 merlins
handles like a sportscar compaired to b17
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

i read somewhere of a particularly nasty problem with the Lancaster.

feathering of props.... the usual procedure was to select an engine, and press a prop feathering button or soemthing similar.

problem was, at a certain point in the button press or a combination of the selector and the button (i cant quite recall), the button would feather all four engines.

this would be somewhat disasterous for an engine failure on take off....

unexplained crashes led to an *ahem* aussie engineer discovering just wtf was going on. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/25.gif

found it, bout half way down the page: gremlins... (http://home.st.net.au/~dunn/gremlins.htm)

Qbeesh800
04-20-2005, 12:46 AM
I still hope that there'll be a little souvenir from Oleg: A-V-E-N-G-E-R.



Hope, mother of fools...

DIRTY-MAC
04-20-2005, 06:59 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by aipilotmarkone:
Ki-27 and A5M at least ai.

DIRTY-MAC, nice plane. CW-21B? Was a cockpit made? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

You bet it has!
model by Gibbage, LeadSpitter the external texture, and Jeronimo for the cockpit!
see it here:
http://www.netwings.org/dcforum/DCForumID43/1307.html

darkhorizon11
04-20-2005, 11:19 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by csThor:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by F19_Olli72:
Maybe not that 'heavy' (but not many were 1940) but at least its 4-engined: FW 200 Condor, operational from 8 april 1940 http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_cool.gif <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

The Fw 200 was no heavy bomber but a passenger plane (mis)used as transport and long-range sea recon plane. Personally I see little use for this type in the BoB-timeframe. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

If BoB ever extends to the North Atlantic it would be quite critical to have a flyable FW-200. The FW was pivotal in the anti-ship role and was definetly responsible for many of the steamers sent to the bottom in the early part of the war.

Given it was no B-17 but it was still critical.

Even Churchill called it out as the scourge of the seas!

csThor
04-20-2005, 11:26 AM
Quite true, but until Maddox Games gives us this playground (Atlantic) and a suitable environment to really play such missions any investment of time and manpower into a Fw200 looks like waste of ressources to me.

masaker2005
04-20-2005, 11:45 AM
What abaout FLYABLE B-17, B-24,Wellington, B5N2, Ju-88, Pe-8, Pe-2,C-47, Lancaster, Ju52 and Tempset. That I want! http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

Krakkers
04-21-2005, 08:58 AM
Well untill it appears on the poll list I will post it here

AVENGER!

Atomic_Marten
04-21-2005, 09:37 AM
Voted B6N on list.

Out of all planes that I wish for PF, on the top of priorites are B6N and Avenger.

For God sake people be sane; <span class="ev_code_YELLOW">what Tempest what Ju88.. etc.? We need TORPEDO bombers here.. </span>http://acompletewasteofspace.com/forum/images/smiles/wtf.gif
http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/51.gif

For Euro theater ok (then we may consider Tempest Ju88 Mosquito etc.), but in PF.. torpedo birds are the one http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif.

darkhorizon11
04-21-2005, 11:54 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Krakkers:
Well untill it appears on the poll list I will post it here

AVENGER! <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Since the copyright issues I don't think we'll be seeing any American planes. Don't get me wrong I'd love an Avenger but since probably won't happen I didn't want to give anyone false hopes...

Sorry Marten, I did two polls earlier. One for the Pacific and one for Europe. This is a combination of both polls, I should have specified in the title.

Atomic_Marten
04-21-2005, 02:49 PM
No problem, then I'll left out everything I wrote, and just say that I have voted for B6N.

Also, I believe that in the upcoming patch we will got some of that named in your poll..
______________________________
Ki-100-I Ko (flyable. ready)
G4M1 (flyable. ready)
MC-200 (waiting from third party to put in engine and program)
MC-202 (almost done in 3D engine)
MC-205 (waiting...)
Re-2000 (waiting...)
Re-2001 (waiting...)
Cr-32 (possibly AI)
Mosquito B.Mk.IV (currently AI)
Mosquito FB.Mk.VI (flyable)
Do-335 (working with the own external model)
Fokker D-XXI (AI)
Tempest Mk.V (AI, waiting for a cockpit)
Spitfire Mk.XIV (waiting for a cockpit)
Avia B-534 (AI)
CW-21 (need to be finsihed).
Fiat G-55 (waiting for a cockpit input)
J2M3 (ready cockpit)
B6N2 (ready external model in 3D engine, third party working over cockpits)
Pe-2 (currently on a CD only for Russian market. I'm sorry for this)
Ju-88A-4 (cockpit and the plane. Sorry need more rework. We started it finally ourselves)
______________________________________-

Soo... http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

darkhorizon11
04-21-2005, 10:15 PM
Yeah those are all looking really sweet although I'd be real surprised if we get them all.

The Yugoslavian IK-3 was sent to Oleg awhile back (before the deadline) and interestingly enough it didn't make the list.

There was also the Letov S.38? I believe is the name of the aircraft that was sent two weeks late. The modeler Gibbage said he wasn't sure if it would make it I mean, if your Oleg its tough to just completely turn down a free plane. But you gotta draw the line.

For the record I the plane I want most is the Do-335. The fastest piston engine fighter that "saw" action. At least as a recon plane.
I'm a big fan of the Luft 46 scenario which many here hate, the planes that are a must have for me that we'll never see are the Ar-234, Gloster Meteor, Shinden, oh and the Japanese version of the 262, a bit smaller with a rounded trailing edge on the tail. Its quite cute looking.

Alas... a man can dream.

Nimits
04-22-2005, 07:08 AM
We need flyable TBF Avenger and B5N Kate, and AI (at least) TBD Devestator, SB2C Helldiver, D4Y Judy, and B6N Jill.

telsono
04-22-2005, 11:03 AM
I would certainly like to see a Wellington with a full cocpit. This would be a true British medium bomber. Wimpy's did so many tasks on various fronts that they would be a good addition to the game. Weren't some Wimpy's used as torpedo bombers?

Atomic_Marten
04-22-2005, 11:26 AM
I have seen the pics of Yugoslavian IK-3 fighter, the cockpit is I believe done.. considering the pic -- I think I saw those on SimHQ forum (if I didn't mistaken three of those type were participated in the defence of Yugoslavia 1941 along with Yugoslavian Hurricanes Mk.I, Do17s Bf109E3s etc.).

IK-3 is looking awesome IMO, too bad we won't see it in PF (maybe, but.. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif).

Andy44
04-22-2005, 03:12 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Nimits:
We need flyable TBF Avenger and B5N Kate, and AI (at least) TBD Devestator, SB2C Helldiver, D4Y Judy, and B6N Jill. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes! All of them! Pacific war simulation without that birds? It's like Battle of Britain game without Hurricane and Heinkel 111!