PDA

View Full Version : "Can you say X-4?"



stathem
05-17-2006, 04:22 AM
Nobody else checked the RRG site since E3 then?

RRG (http://rrgstudios.com/EN_01_01_News.shtml)

stathem
05-17-2006, 04:22 AM
Nobody else checked the RRG site since E3 then?

RRG (http://rrgstudios.com/EN_01_01_News.shtml)

Capt.LoneRanger
05-17-2006, 04:26 AM
Obviously not http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-indifferent.gif

Thanks for the heads up! http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/25.gif

russ.nl
05-17-2006, 04:39 AM
Maybe this?
http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/arm/arm29.htm

http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/1325/x4.jpg

JG53Frankyboy
05-17-2006, 05:03 AM
i would more enjoy a Fw190F-9/Panzerblitz II......... or with what other the LW would attack soviet tanks in that "what if" 45/46 scenario http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

ok, i would also take a Fw190F-9 with SG 113 €žF¶rstersonde€œ armament http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif
just fly over a tank and............ bumm http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

TAW_Oilburner
05-17-2006, 05:15 AM
or this?

http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/modern_flight/mf60.htm

Toten_Waffe
05-17-2006, 05:26 AM
It says that the Northrop X-4 never carried any weapons.....but as the 46 addon is a what if fantasy scenario it may be armed. When i read "X-4" I thought it might be the Northrop as im not sure how well the game engine can handle guided weapons of any sort like the mistel for instance.

russ.nl
05-17-2006, 05:42 AM
I think it's not the Northrop X-4 because it is from 1948 and was not made or designed for ww2.
The rocket is. If there would have been a one year longer war the rocket would surtenly have been used in great numbers.

But I don't know ether if the game engine can handle it.

Toten_Waffe
05-17-2006, 05:49 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by russ.nl:
I think it's not the Northrop X-4 because it is from 1948 and was not made or designed for ww2. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

good point http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/35.gif

russ.nl
05-17-2006, 05:53 AM
It's all still speculating http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/10.gif

Megile_
05-17-2006, 06:21 AM
Oleg playing MSFS http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif

stathem
05-17-2006, 06:24 AM
Could it work the same as the Mistel? In fact, how does the Mistel work, I ain't never used it.

That was interesting in the link - to paraphrase "it was an acoustic proximity warhead tuned to the sound of the B-17's engines"

So it's only useful for attacking B-17s - which would seem to have no place in the VVS46 scenario, the western allies having mysteriously dissappeared. Or would it be assumed that they could be tuned to other engines noises - IL10's presumably.

In fact, what would be the reason for the LW and the VVS to be still fighting in 1946? Have the decadent capitalists treacherously given up the fight? (whilst still selling the Soviets jet engines)

Bremspropeller
05-17-2006, 06:51 AM
X-4



Wasn't too difficult http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-surprised.gif