PDA

View Full Version : B24??



christopher65
09-06-2004, 06:01 AM
Will this bomber make it in as AI??

http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/16x16_smiley-sad.gif

http://img78.photobucket.com/albums/v282/christopher65/rare%20planes/PortraitofaQueen.jpg

christopher65
09-06-2004, 06:01 AM
Will this bomber make it in as AI??

http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/16x16_smiley-sad.gif

http://img78.photobucket.com/albums/v282/christopher65/rare%20planes/PortraitofaQueen.jpg

olaleier
09-06-2004, 06:47 AM
Yes, and likely flyable as well. (later on)

==================================
http://img2.photobucket.com/albums/v30/olaleier/cobrasig.jpg
==================================
Marvin in hyperlobby

Gunny124
09-06-2004, 09:06 AM
Would be more interested to see the Privateer.

christopher65
09-06-2004, 09:27 AM
sure-but we need the b24!!! will be good for the western front as well!! A much more vital plane to the overall war effort.
http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif

http://img78.photobucket.com/albums/v282/christopher65/rare%20planes/PortraitofaQueen.jpg

Snootles
09-06-2004, 12:09 PM
I would think it crucial to at least have the Libby as an AI on release. Very important to make it flyable later on, if not right away. Ubi does say the game has a greater emphasis on bombers. Whatever that means...

******************************
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v448/theskatingribbit/Kudoarticleedited4ver2.jpg

This mysterious article appeared about a week ago in the Washington Post. When questioned about it, the EiC declined to respond. One truth prevails.

VOL_Hans
09-06-2004, 04:21 PM
Seeing as the B-24 was produced in much greater numbers than the B-17, served on Western European, Med, and Pacific fronts, and a few more i'm sure, it would be VERY important to have that plane in the game.

Not to mention, B-24's also served as quite a pain in the stern to the U-boat threat all over the Atlantic.

http://www.altitude.us/missions/The%20Volunteers/hanssig.jpg

wuggle85
09-06-2004, 06:01 PM
if it wasent for the b24 then the brits would have been starved into surrender through lack of supplys

firehttp://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/784.gifstarter

Dagger_3
09-06-2004, 07:43 PM
I am hoping for a B-17 more than a 24'. Sure you can hold more bombs in a 24', buy vets' thend to say that you could put more lead into a 17' http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/smileys-gun2.gif. I also just wanna see how the B-17 handels and the such, but I'll settel for a B-24 anyway. http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/16x16_smiley-tongue.gif


"Son, your never harrased by enemy fighters; your ATTACKED by them" - Dagger_3

aminx
09-06-2004, 08:06 PM
when are we going to see the plane?
aminx

http://img25.photobucket.com/albums/v76/aminx/113.jpg

Snootles
09-06-2004, 09:38 PM
I'll take the B-17 and the B-24 thank you. See also A-26 Invader, B-26 Marauder, B-29 Superfortress and B-32 Dominator (for extended campaign sans atomics).

It's already absolute certainty that A-20 Havoc and B-25 Mitchell will be flyable.

******************************
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v448/theskatingribbit/Kudoarticleedited4ver2.jpg

This mysterious article appeared about a week ago in the Washington Post. When questioned about it, the EiC declined to respond. One truth prevails.