PDA

View Full Version : Which aircraft do you want most?



darkhorizon11
04-05-2005, 06:58 PM

Cpt_Jack
04-05-2005, 07:52 PM
None of the above. These polls are like watching the Grammys, or a presidential election - a very limited number of choices to vote for, and I am not interested in any of them.

fordfan25
04-05-2005, 07:57 PM
ill take # 6 the f4u-4 http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

or maby #7 the avenger.

darkhorizon11
04-05-2005, 10:48 PM
Its only planes on Olegs probables list not wet dreams.

fordfan25
04-05-2005, 10:55 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Cpt_Jack:
None of the above. These polls are like watching the Grammys, or a presidential election - a very limited number of choices to vote for, and I am not interested in any of them. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

as a PF guy and in a PF fighter forum i have to agree with jack. none of the above. but i am happy for all the other guys.

woofiedog
04-05-2005, 11:52 PM
http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/25.gif

http://ipmslondon.tripod.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/c2007.jpg

http://www.nasm.si.edu/exhibitions/gal205/macchi.jpg

EnGaurde
04-06-2005, 12:12 AM
i want the one that has a map of tassie on it.

*sigh*

Badsight.
04-06-2005, 12:22 AM
"What aircraft are you looking forward to flying the most over the skies of Europe?"

http://img19.exs.cx/img19/6228/fig1.jpg

i hope we get it in the new BoB game , needs to be a priority

HotelBushranger
04-06-2005, 01:35 AM
Lol being japanese and all?

For me its the P-40N, they were the most produced of the Kittyhawk series, and saw combat nearly everywhere, including the Med

Alexi_Alx_Anova
04-06-2005, 01:43 AM
Personally I would really, really like to have a flyable C-47. I know it has no guns, but as a simulation, flying a C-47 through a war zone in coop with fighter cover would be grand!

http://www.airventure.org/2004/gallery/images2/c47.jpg

darkhorizon11
04-06-2005, 08:41 AM
@Woofie

I personally went for the Do335 however I'll be looking forward to the Italian birds. I've seen that exhibit in the Smithsonian I believe they have a Spitfire and a 109 also.

SKULLS_Exec01
04-06-2005, 08:53 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by fordfan25:
ill take # 6 the f4u-4 http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

or maby #7 the avenger. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Yep, I have to second that!!!
Its a PTO game - I want PTO planes and maps - PERIOD!

fherathras
04-06-2005, 09:07 AM
[/QUOTE]

Yep, I have to second that!!!
Its a PTO game - I want PTO planes and maps - PERIOD![/QUOTE]



http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/cry.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/88.gif

MichaelMar
04-06-2005, 09:10 AM
A new Italian plane!

flatlander5
04-06-2005, 09:44 AM
Lysander
Swordfish
Vickers Wellingtons
Mosquitos
Halifax
Defiant

the list goes on....

horseback
04-06-2005, 09:53 AM
I'd settle for a Hellcat with a clean windshield or a Lightning with an authentic stall and elevator response...

cheers

horseback

WOLFMondo
04-06-2005, 10:21 AM
Tempest V! Its not just a Pacific game, its also addtional content for the IL2:Fb/AEP in case some of you have not noticed or don't care to buy the entire serieshttp://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif. Besides, the Tempest V was mentioned as a plane to come into the series before Pacific Fighters was even announcedhttp://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif. The AI version is even mentioned on the AEP instruction documenthttp://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

Horseback, the stall qualities of all planes are questionable because of the global FM, not just the lightning. Maybe this new BoB FM will completely alter stalls for all planes so instead of 1 wing dropping all the time planes stall in the manner that they do IRL. At least this is what im hoping anyway.

Rebel_Yell_21
04-06-2005, 10:21 AM
Sig pic is my choice....

Diablo310th
04-06-2005, 10:22 AM
#8 P-47 N

hernanyork
04-06-2005, 10:27 AM
MARTIN 139........THATS ALL

p1ngu666
04-06-2005, 10:39 AM
ach, cant decide http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-sad.gif

[Gypsy]
04-06-2005, 12:27 PM
P40N
P47N
Avenger
Devastator

woofiedog
04-06-2005, 01:33 PM
darkhorizon11... Going and spending sometime at the Smithsonian is something I've got to do.
But the addition of the Italian Birds to IL-2... I hope is in the near future.

womenfly
04-06-2005, 01:45 PM
<span class="ev_code_PINK">..... I would be happy if they would just fix the TRIM!</span> http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/51.gif

WOLFMondo
04-06-2005, 02:05 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by p1ngu666:
ach, cant decide http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-sad.gif <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Yeah you can, got 1 engine, 4 cannon, does close to 400mph on the deck...http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

ReligiousZealot
04-06-2005, 02:21 PM
Let's see...if I remember correctly, the list is as follows:

For the PTO:
Flyable Fighter(s):
<UL TYPE=SQUARE>
<LI>Kawanishi N1K1-J Shiden "George"
<LI>Vought F4U-4 Corsair

Flyable Torpedo Bomber(s):
<LI>Douglas TBD Devastator
<LI>Nakajima B5N2 Type 97 "Kate"
<LI>Grumman TBM-1C Avenger
<LI>Nakajima B6N2 Tenzan "Jill"
<LI>Fairy Firefly

Flyable Dive Bomber(s):
<LI>Curtiss SB2C-1C Helldiver
<LI>Yokosuka D4Y1 Suisei "Judy"
<LI>Fairy Barracuda

Flyable Medium Bomber(s):
<LI>Martin B-26 Marauder
<LI>Mitsubishi G4M "Betty"

Flyable Seaplane(s):
<LI>Vought OS2U Kingfisher
<LI>Consolidated PBY/N Catalina
<LI>Kawanishi H8K "Emily"

At least AI Only:
<LI>Northrop P-61 Black Widow
<LI>Douglas A-26 Invader
<LI>Kawanishi H6K "Mavis"
<LI>Martin PBM Mariner
<LI>Mitsubishi G3M "Nell"
<LI>Mitsubishi Ki-27 "Sally"
[/list]

I'll make another post with the other theaters included, but this is what I've thought about that I, and many others, would like to see added to PF.

P-38_Lightning
04-06-2005, 03:30 PM
All of the above

Mostly: Dornier Do 3353 Pfeil
Junkers Ju 88
Hawker Tempest V

AFSG_Jedi
04-06-2005, 05:22 PM
The Aircraft that I would like most is the aircraft that I CAN'T have. What I can have is what I will get so I don't want it. I will always want what I can't have more than anything. & I want it now! http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/cry.gif

ReligiousZealot
04-06-2005, 05:55 PM
What we need to do is create some sort of doc or thread with a complete organized listing of the planes everyone wants to see, then submit it to Oleg just so he has an idea of what types of aircraft people want to be able to fly...I guess just drop me a line at haggart85@hotmail.com with what plane(s) you want to see added and I'll work it into a finalized list I'll eventually post on this forum. Make sure the subject header is clear or I'll never recieve it because my spam filter will junk it.

DarthBane_
04-06-2005, 06:15 PM
He177 for some serious dive bombings.

darkhorizon11
04-07-2005, 12:37 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by ReligiousZealot:
What we need to do is create some sort of doc or thread with a complete organized listing of the planes everyone wants to see, then submit it to Oleg just so he has an idea of what types of aircraft people want to be able to fly...I guess just drop me a line at haggart85@hotmail.com with what plane(s) you want to see added and I'll work it into a finalized list I'll eventually post on this forum. Make sure the subject header is clear or I'll never recieve it because my spam filter will junk it. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>


Its been done. There was a massive poll of over 100 improvements and how much each was wanted for BoB over IL2. It was sent into Oleg.

The real problem is just time. 1c isn't a very big team. Most of the planes in the game now are 3D party. He does listen to us if you go the Ready Room forum he posts in their almost weekly.

GerritJ9
04-07-2005, 02:14 AM
I voted Macchi 202-205, but would prefer:

Fighters (flyable):
Ki.27
B-339C/D/E

Other (AI):
Lockheed Hudson
Dornier Do 24K
Glenn Martin B-10 (139 or 166 versions)
Mitsubishi G3M
Ki.21.

For the European theatre, more Italian aeroplanes are needed, hence my vote for the 202-205. There are sufficient representatives of other countries.

Treetop64
04-07-2005, 07:59 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by DarthBane_:
He177 for some serious dive bombings. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

That would be cool to have the 177 flyable, or even in the game at all. Funny you would contemplate dive-bombing in it, though! http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif


What a weird plane; Germany's only attempt to field a heavy strategic bomber had two engines driving one prop on each wing. That might help with the aerodynamics a bit, but that configuration seems like it would be a friggin' maintenence nightmare for the techs on the ground, and for the pilot's piece-of-mind while in flight.

lronSight
04-07-2005, 08:28 PM
P38M http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_razz.gif

Treetop64
04-07-2005, 08:46 PM
What plane do I want the most? A Mooney M20M TLS "Bravo". Barring having sufficient personal funds to actually accuire and maintain one of these beasts, I'll settle for the addition of the Do-335 in PF for use in the ETO.

TX-EcoDragon
04-07-2005, 09:44 PM
Hmm. . . you know. . . I would most like to see an Edge 540 or Panzl 330. . .

TheRealAttalus
04-07-2005, 09:49 PM
Only 1 aircraft...B17

F4UDash4
04-08-2005, 05:35 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Treetop64:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by DarthBane_:
He177 for some serious dive bombings. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

That _would_ be cool to have the 177 flyable, or even in the game at all. Funny you would contemplate dive-bombing in it, though! <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Funnier yet is the fact that the Germans actually contemplated the same thing.

Andrew OConnor
04-08-2005, 05:42 AM
The 'Squirt', an allied waterborne fighter, looking like an ultra compressed Short Sunderland os what I want to see. Only ten or so were built - the war ended too early, but it was very sucessful, only problem was because of its solid bottom, if any logs were floating, you got holed.

masaker2005
04-08-2005, 06:07 AM
I personaly want:B-17,B-29,Ju-88, B5N2, C-47, Swordfish and Tempest.

kalaluth
04-08-2005, 07:36 AM
A flyable P-36 (A1 prefered but I should be glad with A3) or MS-406.

lew1991
04-10-2005, 05:14 AM
Gloster meteor would be fun especially against me-262 (seem to be pretty evenly matched!) and maybe a flyable B-29 complete with A-bomb(As in atomic bomb not "a bomb")it would be good for sinking carriers! http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/784.gif

Lewis

Feathered_IV
04-10-2005, 06:09 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> A flyable P-36 (A1 prefered but I should be glad with A3) or MS-406. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

I kind of feel sorry for the French players. They have nothing that they can fly over their home ground http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/51.gif.

lew1991
04-22-2005, 11:58 AM
Lancasters they rock. they can carry 2X as much bombs as a B-17 and are more shootdownable maybe in the distant future a bouncing bomb damb-buster aswell but it probably would be complicated modelling and using of the barrel-bombs

peteward
04-22-2005, 12:22 PM
It would be nice to have a flyable Blenheim Mk IV.But I suppose a Mosquito will do for now.
http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif

jeroen_R90S
04-22-2005, 01:19 PM
Pe-2!

And Ju 88 as a second thought.

Jeroen

HotelBushranger
05-09-2005, 05:26 AM
Hind http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/heart.gif Lancaster next, then B-24, Swordfish, SM 79, Macchi's, G. 55's, Beaufighter Mk VI's, and definitely the Po-2!!!


It would be nice to have a flyable Blenheim Mk IV.But I suppose a Mosquito will do for now.

http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-sad.gif Blenheim is the ugliest British bomber in existence!!!

CKY_86
05-09-2005, 05:48 AM
Originally posted by lew1991:
Lancasters they rock. they can carry 2X as much bombs as a B-17 and are more shootdownable maybe in the distant future a bouncing bomb damb-buster aswell but it probably would be complicated modelling and using of the barrel-bombs

i dont think it would be that hard to model it, weve allready got skip bombing & it would just have to be extended a bit more.

as for the plane i want the most, check my sig http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-wink.gif

HotelBushranger
05-09-2005, 05:54 AM
i dont think it would be that hard to model it, weve allready got skip bombing & it would just have to be extended a bit more.

My thoughts exactly

Feathered_IV
05-09-2005, 06:52 AM
My vote goes to the A5M1 and A5M4 Claudes. Beautiful things.....

Lupo_Argentato
05-09-2005, 08:44 AM
Macchi!!!
http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/25.gif

Skyraider3D
05-09-2005, 12:44 PM
This one http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif
http://home.wanadoo.nl/r.j.o/skyraider/ju88_1.htm
http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/1241.gif
O, what was that? http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-tongue.gif


Do 335 would be more than awesome too!!!

JadehawkII
05-09-2005, 12:55 PM
I voted for the Do-335. But would also love to see the Tempest too. But then most airplane I want is the F8U-1 Bearcat. They were there in Theater just as the war ended. So I can't see why we cant have this. I can wish though http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif

harryrriedl
05-09-2005, 01:00 PM
I WANT A P0 2 but i voted for ju88 because any twin with mutipul postions are good news for the sim

GOOD BYE From the VHAP

Skyraider3D
05-09-2005, 01:12 PM
I agree with you for a full 100%! The Po-2 was the most-built aircraft of all time (nearly 40,000) and played a vital role in WW2 for the Soviet Union, yet it's AI only!
It would be quite interesting to see how it would handle in a multiplay arena. In real life, they were a downright pain to shoot down as they were terribly slow and utterly manouevrable!


PS. Apologies for the spam, but I have just started a cutaway 3D model of the Po-2:
http://home.wanadoo.nl/r.j.o/skyraider/u-2vs_1wip.htm
Still a long way to go!! http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

Atomic_Marten
05-09-2005, 02:44 PM
Potez 631, Pe-2, Tempest!!, He100, He112, Ju87A, Bf110C, Hs129, Fokker D.XXI, Hawk 75, M.S.406, Dewoitine D.520, Do17!!, MC.205, Bf109G4 and several others.

ElAurens
05-09-2005, 04:33 PM
I have wanted to fly the MC 202 since the beginning of IL2. I still want to.

Yog_Shoggoth
05-09-2005, 07:22 PM
CLAUDE
CLAUDE
CLAUDE
CLAUDE
CLAUDE
CLAUDE
CLAUDE
CLAUDE

MoPai
05-10-2005, 12:04 AM
been looking forward to the Do-335 since EAW

Boxer_1
05-10-2005, 01:48 PM
I voted for the Do but I want them all http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif.

CzechTexan
05-11-2005, 08:05 AM
Still hoping for the flyable U-2VS and Pe-2, both flown by the Soviet female bomber regiments.

LuckyBoy1
05-11-2005, 09:36 AM
I'd be happy with any flyable four engine bomber added.

J_Weaver
05-12-2005, 09:10 AM
I'm really looking foward to the JU-88 and Mossie. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_cool.gif

The F7F and F8F would be really cool! But thats justa pipe dream. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/cry.gif

IL2-chuter
05-13-2005, 01:52 AM
Flyable. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif

Heartland
05-13-2005, 01:59 AM
I would REALLY like some more flyable two-engine planes, first and foremost the Pe-2 and Mosquito. The Ju-88 would be good too.

jeanba2
05-13-2005, 02:03 AM
For PF : flyable Kate and / or B6N
For FB (eastern front) : Flyable Pe-2
Others : flyable Tempest

SpartanHoplite
05-13-2005, 07:26 AM
Mc 202/Mc 205.

I don't yet have a decent plane to fly while wearing my designer sunglasses.

SH

lebobouba
05-13-2005, 04:49 PM
Flyable:

TBD Devastator
SB2C Helldiver
A20C Havoc
B25D/J with 12.7mm MG battery in the nose
P38F/G
A36/P51A Apache/MustangI
P36/Hawk 75
Pe2
Ms 406
Ju88
Hs 129
D4Y Judy
N1K1/2 George
J2M Jack
Tempest
Mosquito
Italian Planes

AI if possible:

Wellington
Hudson
Beaufort
Ki-21 Sally
Ki-51 Sonia
Ki-48 Lily
G3M Nell
P1Y Frances
B7A Grace

NorrisMcWhirter
05-13-2005, 08:31 PM
Yeah, more twin engined. And lagg3 fixed.

No more of these yawn-fest late war UFOs; the PT is boring enough as it is. Anything later than 1943 (apart from Dornier) should be binned.


Ta,
Norris

HotelBushranger
05-14-2005, 06:27 AM
Yeah ^, there needs to be more concentration earlier planes

Michael1985_614
08-06-2005, 05:35 AM
REMEMBER THE ITALIAN FIGHTERS PLANES :
After FIAT G50 and Fiat CR42 there are:

MACCHI MC 200 "Saetta"
Year 1939, engine Fiat A.74 RC38 Radial 14 cylinders, air cooled 840HP. Top speed 512 km/h at 5000 meters, armament 2-machine-guns.
MC200 (http://xoomer.virgilio.it/adiitalia/trackil2FB/mc200.jpg)
URL dscription: Macchi Mc. 200 MM.5835, with the pilot: "Raffaello Novelli"

MACCHI MC 202 "Folgore"
Year 1941, engine: Daimler Benz DB 601/A1 12 cylinders V liquid cooled, 1175HP, Top speed: 600km/h at 5500 meters, armament: 2-machine-guns.
mc202 (http://xoomer.virgilio.it/adiitalia/trackil2FB/mc202.jpg)
Image dscription: Macchi Mc.202 with the desert coloration.
MC202-1 (http://xoomer.virgilio.it/adiitalia/trackil2FB/mc202-1.jpg)
Image dscription: Macchi Mc 202 at the airport of €œCampoformido€ in the'42

REGGIANE RE2000 €œFalco€
Year 1939, engine Piaggio P.XI RC 40, radial 14 cylinders, air cooled 1000HP. Top speed 530 km/h at 5000 meters, armament: 2-machine-guns.
RE2000 (http://xoomer.virgilio.it/adiitalia/trackil2FB/re2000.jpg)

re2000-1 (http://www.vvs-regia-avions.com/Regia1/Re2000(catapultato)s.jpg)
Image dscription [Re2000 over the catapult of armored ship €œlittorio class€]

REGGIANE RE2001 €œAriete€
Year 1941, engine: Daimler Benz DB 601/A1 12 cylinders, liquid cooled, 1175HP,
Top speed: 563km/h at 5400 meters, armament: 4-machine-guns.
re2001 (http://xoomer.virgilio.it/adiitalia/trackil2FB/ReggianeRe2001.jpg)

REGGIANE RE2002 €œFalco2€
Year 1943, engine: Piaggio P.XIX RC 45 Radial 14 cylinders, air cooled 1175HP Top speed: 530km/h at 5500 meters, armament: 4-machine-guns, and 660kg of bombs.
re2002 (http://xoomer.virgilio.it/adiitalia/trackil2FB/re2002.jpg)

FIAT G55 €œCentauro€
Year 1943 engine: Daimler Benz DB 605/A 12 cylinders, liquid cooled, 1475HP
Top speed: 620km/h at 7400 meters, armament: 2-machine-guns and 3 guns to 20mm.
g55 (http://www.italie1935-45.chez.tiscali.fr/pg55/image003.jpg)

MACCHI MC205 €œVeltro€
Year 1943 engine: Daimler Benz DB 605/A 12 cylinders, liquid cooled, 1475HP
Top speed: 650km/h at 7400 meters, armament: 2-machine-guns and 2 guns to 20mm.
mc205 (http://www.regiamarina.net/arsenals/planes_it/macchi/images/mc205a.jpg)

REGGIANE RE2005 €œSagittario€(TOP Italian plane-- better than spitfire)
Year 1943, engine: Daimler Benz DB 605/A 12 cylinders, liquid cooled, 1475HP
Top speed: 678km/h at 2000 meters, armament: 2-machine-guns and 3 guns 20mm, Max altitude: 12000 meters.
re2005 (http://xoomer.virgilio.it/adiitalia/trackil2FB/RE2005.jpg)

Neville_Duke
08-06-2005, 08:20 AM
http://ourworld.cs.com/giaccone%20daniele/Mc202_75.jpg http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/11.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/11.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/25.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/53.gif

Neville_Duke
08-06-2005, 08:22 AM
http://ourworld.cs.com/giaccone%20daniele/Sm79_75.jpg http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_eek.gif http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_eek.gif http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_eek.gif http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_eek.gif http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_eek.gif

Neville_Duke
08-06-2005, 08:24 AM
http://ourworld.cs.com/giaccone%20daniele/G55-PM9807.jpg http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/53.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/53.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/53.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/53.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/53.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/53.gif

msalama
08-06-2005, 08:29 AM
1) Lancaster
2) Mosquito
3) Ju-88
4) Pe-2
5) C-47 / Li-2 / L2D

Neville_Duke
08-06-2005, 08:34 AM
http://ourworld.cs.com/giaccone%20daniele/typhoon1024.bmp http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/53.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/53.gif http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/53.gif

Nimits
08-06-2005, 05:38 PM
None of the above for me.

O'm still waiting for the flyable Avenger and Kate.

Monty_Thrud
08-06-2005, 06:31 PM
Spitfire Mk XIV
Tempest~ flyable
Mosquito~ flyable

RAF needs these~~~deserves these~~~and would very much like these~~~please

Atomic_Marten
08-06-2005, 06:32 PM
Originally posted by Nimits:
None of the above for me.

O'm still waiting for the flyable Avenger and Kate.

http://free-vk.t-com.hr/domagoj/smileys/dito.gif

Neville_Duke
08-06-2005, 06:47 PM
http://ourworld.cs.com/giaccone%20daniele/TakingOffFrontView.jpg http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_razz.gif http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

Slickun
08-06-2005, 08:54 PM
82" map (25 lbs boost) P-51D flying on 145 octane fuel from Iwo making fighter sweeps over Japan.

MINTZ2
08-06-2005, 09:50 PM
Yep number 6,7 and 8, plus a fixed flight model for US planes.

Christos_swc
08-07-2005, 03:24 AM
Bf 109 for me.
I like the fact that at any stage in the war even when outdated it still had some sort of advantage over it's opponent you could use to syrvive, speed, climb, dive, turn, whatever, depending on the oponent.
The 190 in comparison was king when first out but later on couldn't compete in either the vertical or horizontal fighting.
The Dora was late coming out so 109 it is for me.
I like some US planes too, especially the P-47, I dislike the P-51 and I consider the Spit an adversary not a possible choice http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

HotelBushranger
08-07-2005, 04:18 AM
Hawk 75A-3 is the current hot choice for me. It'd be nice to have another plane usable for the Finnish, French, Dutch, Chinese, Thai, Argentinians (http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/35.gif) etc.

arancia
08-07-2005, 06:37 AM
It would be time to put Macchi planes in the game...at last!

Yoghi
08-07-2005, 06:43 AM
I vote for the Macchi!!!!! http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

Kocur_
08-07-2005, 07:04 AM
9: D-13 http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif

Seriously: Macchi's.


CzechTexan!

">>P-63C KingCobra "Gift From Kolkhoze Workers in the name of Lenin Vitebsk Province<< "

Great jokehttp://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/88.gif

CUJO_1970
08-07-2005, 02:31 PM
FIAT G-55

MACCHI MC-205

REGGIANE RE-2005

huggy87
08-07-2005, 03:05 PM
Spitfire Mk I
Devestator
Bearcat
Mosquito
Avenger flyable
Tempest flyable
Meteor
Ki-45
Ki-44
Hs-129 flyable
George flyable
Judy
Jill

56th BMAC
08-08-2005, 02:27 PM
I'll put in my vote for a P-47N http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/11.gif

Tuba2004
08-08-2005, 07:36 PM
[QUOTE]Originally posted by WOLFMondo:
Tempest V! Its not just a Pacific game, its also addtional content for the IL2:Fb/AEP in case some of you have not noticed or don't care to buy the entire serieshttp://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif.QUOTE]

Well, YES! I did notice And Yes I do have ALL the other parts of the series (IL2 through PF).However, thanks for the backhand!
As Fordfan45 said "... none of the above. but I am happy for all the other guys."
My question back is: With the extensive developed simulation that FB and AEP provides with its large selection of planes, etc.
Do You realize how it sounds to the PTO group, that are trying to just get a Complete Basic simulated area, when all you seem to be interested in is getting even more planes for the already fairly well populated FB/AEP arena?
And Yes, before you make another snide comment, I do fly the FB/AEP part of the series and enjoy it. Do you try to set up and fly naval battles like Midway? Lacking for a few things isn't it?

Rataslaw
08-16-2005, 01:48 AM
Well, WOLFMondo`s respond was probably directed to
fherathras :
[/QUOTE]

Yep, I have to second that!!!
Its a PTO game - I want PTO planes and maps - PERIOD![/QUOTE]
http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/10.gif

I fly mostly European skies but i really enjoy every plane no matter where it`s flying.
Voted for Mosquito, but thnx for every new plane http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/11.gif, do not depends on the its origin operation theatre.......i truly welcome everything new! http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/25.gif
ONLY NO NEWS ARE BAD NEWS IN THIS CASE!!!

PapaG39
08-16-2005, 08:12 AM
I don't even want half of the aircraft that we do have...I don't want any more aircraft.!!!
I just want the da*mn FMB fixed so that we have small cargo supply boats that go "BIG BOOM" and burn & smoke like for real. I want more ground targets that flame up, go "BOOM" & stay burning for a while... I would like aircraft that are destroyed on the ground to flame, burn & smoke..not just turn black & lay on one side...that is lame as he*ll in my opinion.

Treetop64
08-16-2005, 02:10 PM
Originally posted by PapaG39:
I don't even want half of the aircraft that we do have...I don't want any more aircraft.!!!
I just want the da*mn FMB fixed so that we have small cargo supply boats that go "BIG BOOM" and burn & smoke like for real. I want more ground targets that flame up, go "BOOM" & stay burning for a while... I would like aircraft that are destroyed on the ground to flame, burn & smoke..not just turn black & lay on one side...that is lame as he*ll in my opinion.

You know, I have to admit that I agree with you there, buddy...

As for which plane, well, I want my own trouble-free, issue-free, perfectly good-running Mooney M20M TLS "Bravo". I also want to have sex with Halle Berry, but that's not going to happen either...

Skyraider3D
08-16-2005, 02:44 PM
He's got a point alright. The original-IL-2-vintage special effects are rather dull...

I would be happy already with accurate stall behaviour on the Fw 190 and P-38 http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

Akwar
08-16-2005, 08:47 PM
Totally worthless thread. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif

SeperateCheck
08-16-2005, 08:50 PM
Hi,

the aircraft i want is this:

http://1000aircraftphotos.com/APS/1917L.jpg

or A-1 Skyraider. Personally I think the A-1 was one of the finest propeller driven aircraft ever made. shrug.

Badsight.
08-17-2005, 01:12 AM
hah ! , nice pic - i too want the F5U in FB . i think it would rule in DF

& yes the Skyraider would be awesome too , best G/A prop ever , probably , it at least could carry more than the IL-10 & was probably even stronger

Skyraider3D
08-17-2005, 01:35 AM
Badsight, the Skyraider could carry more than a B-17! Also it could outturn Mustangs and Corsairs.

In 1954 Skyraiders shot down two Chinese La-7s and in the Vietnam War two MiG-17s were shot down by Skyraiders.

My fave plane as you may be able to tell http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_cool.gif

Unfortunately it doesn't really fit into this game http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_frown.gif Common Oleg, do a Korean War sim! http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

Badsight.
08-17-2005, 02:42 AM
ive read the account from different sources , one stated -7s , the other said -9s . personally i doubt they were La-7s , China got La-9s from russia & thats besides the untreated wooden Lavochkins rotted fast in unvavourable conditions -------- like 6 months

for the humungous Skyraider to score a kill on La-9s had to either be a jump kill or totally unbelieveably bad Chinese pilots , happened out at sea too

ive seen pics of the Skyraider , ut they dont do the planes size justice , they are HUGE !

dwarf a Thunderbolt eaisly

EDIT : btw Skyraider , ive been seeing your CGI stuff on the interweb for a couple of years now , i surf CGtalk as well as your military modeling website . dude - when are you going to do a Shinden !

come on , you know you want too !

Skyraider3D
08-17-2005, 06:26 AM
In case of the La vs. Skyraider battle, two patrolling Skyraiders were bounced by two Chinese La's (whatever variety http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif I agree La-9 is more likely) and called in help. A few more Skyraiders and a Corsair joined the battle and both La's were wasted. Even though the balance in terms of numbers was out, it still shows the Skyraider could hold its own against the La, otherwise they'd be shot down before help arrived. I guess they simply outturned them http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif


Shinden - it's a great aircraft and I'd love to model it, but simply no time. All work I do these days is for books, veterans, aircraft owners, etc... I currently have over half a dozen Mustang 'jobs' on the go!
Next will be the Corsair (almost all models) and Fw 190 A-8, one of my personal favourites.

darkhorizon11
08-17-2005, 04:50 PM
Geez the P-38 whining on both sides is bad enough, so I won't dare ask for another one of those.

Imagine if us Allied guys had:

Gloester Meteor
P-51H
P-47N Razorback

They'd need to dedicate an entire forum of "not fair" whines!

MLudner
08-17-2005, 05:18 PM
My own laundry list (I voted Mosquito, BTW):
He-219 (F)
P-47M/N (F)
Stirling
Lancaster
Typhoon (F)
Do-217 and other flying pencils.
B-26 / Boston
Earlier marks of the A-20 (F)
Earleir marks of the Bf-110 (F)
The P-61 (F) [Though, likely, that won't happen]
And a lead zeppelin.

huggy87
08-17-2005, 05:43 PM
Nice try everyone, but this is the correct answer:


Originally posted by huggy87:
Spitfire Mk I
Devestator
Bearcat
Mosquito
Avenger flyable
Tempest flyable
Meteor
Ki-45
Ki-44
Hs-129 flyable
George flyable
Judy
Jill

JerryFodder
08-18-2005, 04:37 AM
Originally posted by SKULLS_Exec01:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by fordfan25:
ill take # 6 the f4u-4 http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

or maby #7 the avenger.

Yep, I have to second that!!!
Its a PTO game - I want PTO planes and maps - PERIOD! </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

It's almost as though you think that the British were not in the PTO. The Mozzy certainly was.

I guess to you if it isn't american then it shouldn't be included???

ashley2005
08-18-2005, 09:55 AM
ah yes ..as i suspected most people want the british fighters ...BRING ON BOB BABY!!!!

Warbird-
08-18-2005, 04:58 PM
What I don´t get is why, in the best flight combat simulator ever made, we don't have a flyable four engine heavy bomber.

I just don't understand it. Obviously I know nothing about game producing, but logic says it would take less time for the game creators to research and model, let's say, a B-29 or a Lancaster than to waste time studying the minimal diffences between so many Spits and P-Whatever versions we have in the game.

bogusheadbox
08-19-2005, 03:25 AM
you know i tried to avoid this post. But after long deliberation.

I would like to see two of the following.

1. A true 4 engine bomber.
Some of us like to fly and not just wizz bang around in a fighter.

2. As the IL2 series has prgressed through its life. So has the depth in engine managment and damage madelling. So i would like to see more complex engine management to make this more sim like.

Now flying a 4 engine bomber with more complex engine and aircraft management. Every mission would be a true experience.

csThor
08-19-2005, 03:54 AM
A twin-engined bomber requires roughly 4-5 times the amount of time/manpower than a single engined fighter (and much more than a variant of an already present fighter). Double that figure for a 4-engined Heavy and add that to the fact, that we have no real maps for the heavies where they can take off, fly, bomb, fly back and land again with realistic distances. Ackstarring on a dogfight server doesn't count http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

JerryFodder
08-19-2005, 05:38 AM
Originally posted by csThor:
A twin-engined bomber requires roughly 4-5 times the amount of time/manpower than a single engined fighter (and much more than a variant of an already present fighter). Double that figure for a 4-engined Heavy and add that to the fact, that we have no real maps for the heavies where they can take off, fly, bomb, fly back and land again with realistic
distances. Ackstarring on a dogfight server doesn't count http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

You're just saying that because Germany only had the FW200 and that wasn't used extensively. The big bombers won the war, and would help winloads of online missions quickly too.

Regardless of this, they were very much a part of the history and i'd love to see them all eventually - starting with the Lancaster http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

Skyraider3D
08-19-2005, 06:45 AM
How about actual accurate flight performance on the Fw 190 D-9 and Ta 152 H... meaning a boost which lasts for half an hour without overheating. Cause that's how it worked on the real thing. Without boost, these planes had rather poor performance compared to Yaks, La's, Spits and Mustangs... But with boost... marvellous http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif
I am pretty sure the ta 152 was the best fighter of the war. Doesn't show in IL-2 though... still a good hack http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

bogusheadbox
08-19-2005, 07:37 AM
Orrrrrr


How about propper 4 engined bombers ???

EJGrOst_Caspar
08-19-2005, 10:41 AM
How about the TB-3? http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/35.gif
No flyable 4 engine bomber, huh? I doubt, you'd try that one.

Anyway I will be happy with all that ones that will come soon (hopefully).

And in the end I will only miss the Ki-44.

depalmer
08-19-2005, 08:02 PM
Agree with HotelBushranger the P40N (Most produced version of the P40) and hopefully we get the finished MC 200 (Take a look over at netwings it is a work of art)

Nimits
08-19-2005, 09:52 PM
Originally posted by JerryFodder:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by SKULLS_Exec01:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by fordfan25:
ill take # 6 the f4u-4 http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

or maby #7 the avenger.

Yep, I have to second that!!!
Its a PTO game - I want PTO planes and maps - PERIOD! </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

It's almost as though you think that the British were not in the PTO. The Mozzy certainly was.

I guess to you if it isn't american then it shouldn't be included??? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Knock off knocking the US planes and the guys who want. Sheesh, this sim already has more British, USSR, and Nazi planes than any sim made to date, it would be nice finish the PTO plane set, both USN and IJN. The RAF's fighters were minor players in the PTO, the USN TBFs and IJN B6Ns were there for almost every major action. We don't have any CBI maps for the RAF to play against the Japanese on, and the ETO maps are barely adaquate. What may be the final patch for a PTO sims looks like it may not have any PTO planes (at least flyable, and the Mosquito, as cool as it is, is not a PTO plane).

Jagdklinger
08-22-2005, 03:36 AM
Realistic:
Just making the Tempest flyable would be nice... the P40N wouldn't be that hard to add, surely, as would a Spit IX with better boost. And a P47N wouldn't require that many changes either.
And Macchis have that 'cool' factor...

Rant:
BUT the aircraft that is most missed is the Typhoon - it's a travesty that the Ta152 or even the TEMPEST or FW190D gets modelled (don't get me started on the Go229 and similiar) and the far more common Typhoon never rates a mention.

And people want to put the Do335 in the game? They look awesome, but, (correct me if I was wrong) isn't that, like, one of those uber-Luftwaffe prototypes with, I bet, all of 3 seeing action (if that). Aren't people happy with the Bf109Z?.....

Lancasters/B29s etc sound cool - but would 4-engined bombers would be used enough to warrant the effort devoted to put them in game?

Despite being a blue pilot, I think the Brits have been the most severely shortchanged... (if thats what you can call griping about free patches - thanks Oleg!)

...oh, and did I mention the Mosquito?

bogusheadbox
08-22-2005, 04:51 AM
Originally posted by EJGrOst_Caspar:
How about the TB-3? http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/35.gif
No flyable 4 engine bomber, huh? I doubt, you'd try that one.

Anyway I will be happy with all that ones that will come soon (hopefully).

And in the end I will only miss the Ki-44.

The TB3 you say. Ummmm no. I like flying multi engine aircraft. But call me an elitist. Everytime i see this plane... I shudder.

How about a propper 4 engine bomber.

WOLFMondo
08-22-2005, 05:36 AM
After much soul searching and deep meditative thought on a a mountain....I still want the Tempest V most of all.

A Lancaster would be cool too, especially if it came with Tallboy, Grandslam and Upkeep. Imaging vulching with any one of those weapons!

JerryFodder
08-22-2005, 09:55 AM
Originally posted by Jagdklinger:
Despite being a blue pilot, I think the Brits have been the most severely shortchanged...

The voice of reason. There's the USN griping about lack of the very last version of the F4U amongst other things when the RAF/Fleet Air Arm are missing Typhoon, Tempest, Lancaster, Halifax, Wellington, Swordfish & Fulmar, Manchester, Mosquito, Barracuda, Albemarle, B-24 Skua, Whirlwind and i'm sure there are a few more too.

I'm hoping that BoB will give us some long awaited maps and an improvement on the AC range too.

Don't get me wrong, i'm not complaining at the series at all, rather some of the customer requests !

Majormajor-01
08-22-2005, 05:24 PM
Originally posted by DarthBane_:
He177 for some serious dive bombings.

And how about the serious engine fires and transmission failures that went with them......Good looking bird but I'd rather fly ugly than go down in style http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

Majormajor-01
Jamming Pentagon computers for over 60 years http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif