PDA

View Full Version : Better Trivia Question



FlakMagnent
01-12-2005, 08:21 PM
Besides the rear and foward propellers, what other feature did the Do335 have that was diffrent from the other fighters?

ColoradoBBQ
01-12-2005, 09:37 PM
It had explosive bolts to blast off the rear fuselage when in trouble?

Athosd
01-12-2005, 09:46 PM
Much better http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

It also had a rocket assisted ejection seat IIRC.

ElAurens
01-12-2005, 09:51 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by FlakMagnent:
Besides the rear and foward propellers, what other feature did the Do335 have that was diffrent from the other fighters? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

It was as ugly as a mud fence in the rain?

FlakMagnent
01-12-2005, 10:10 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by ColoradoBBQ:
It had explosive bolts to blast off the rear fuselage when in trouble? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

you are right!! Athosd is also correct. Ill make another question soon

FlakMagnent
01-12-2005, 10:15 PM
Here is the next question. Which Ecperimental German Bomber used four Junker Jumos but also had two BMW 003 turbo jet engines for a supplemental boost under each wing??

JaggedRaven
01-12-2005, 10:31 PM
It was the four engined version of the arado...I don't remember the numberical designation other than it was three digits (AR-234 or something)Would have made one heck of a production bomber if it had gone to that stage...love the all plexiglass nose too...great FOV.

chris455
01-12-2005, 10:32 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by ElAurens:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by FlakMagnent:
Besides the rear and foward propellers, what other feature did the Do335 have that was diffrent from the other fighters? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

It was as ugly as a mud fence in the rain? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

HA!! http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/88.gif

FlakMagnent
01-12-2005, 10:41 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by JaggedRaven:
It was the four engined version of the arado...I don't remember the numberical designation other than it was three digits (AR-234 or something)Would have made one heck of a production bomber if it had gone to that stage...love the all plexiglass nose too...great FOV. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

nope, sorry. wrong manufacture.. What you are talking about i believe, has four BMW 003's and was referred too as the "Blitz" Bomber. Good guess tho.. that was gonna be one of my other questions.. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/25.gif

berg417448
01-12-2005, 10:45 PM
I was thinking Ju-287 ..I know there were plans for a 6 engine version...but then again...I think it had Walter rocket assist instead of Jumos...so I'm probably wrong.

FlakMagnent
01-12-2005, 11:23 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by berg417448:
I was thinking Ju-287 ..I know there were plans for a 6 engine version...but then again...I think it had Walter rocket assist instead of Jumos...so I'm probably wrong. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

yep wrong, sorry. close though. still wrong builders... It only had turbo jets while the one in question has 4 props and 2 assist turbo jets

berg417448
01-12-2005, 11:36 PM
Oh...I misread it. Me-264?

DuxCorvan
01-13-2005, 02:12 AM
Some He 177 variant... it always had trouble with its paired engines (two props, four engines), so they decided to put them alone, each one with its prop... maybe they also put the two jets. (?)