PDA

View Full Version : ***SPOILERS*** Subject 16 could be Desmond's son?



Mr_Stunner
12-29-2010, 05:37 PM
What if subject 16 is in reality Desmond's son.
This would make sense assuming that Desmond really goes to Eden find Eve.
Imagina that the world really ends December 2012, and somehow Desmond manage to survive, The ones who came before are ressurected by the satellite, and they create a new Eden, then Desmond goes to Eden find Eve, and that's him calling her on the video, because the voice is heard and they turn rapidly and suspiciously, so that means there's a 3rd person behind them.
Now subject 16 being Desmond's son would relieve it in the animus and recorded it and made the thruth glyphs for giving clues to Desmond, that's why he laughs when Desmond calls him Subject 16 and talks about his son.
The only thing that doesn't make sense is why Subject 16 was in Abstergo before Desmond, maybe he was only the data it showed and Abstergo uncovers something more...

chizzy12
12-29-2010, 05:58 PM
desmond is like 30.....

THE-GRIZZLEY
12-29-2010, 06:10 PM
It's possible (barely, but possible.)

I think it makes more sense if they're brothers..

beatledude210
12-29-2010, 06:53 PM
I first thought that Vidic and Lucy talked about 16 as if he was in the animus right before Desmond. But anyway, good theory

Mr_Stunner
12-30-2010, 06:46 AM
And Vidic and Lucy talked about it indeed. But maybe something more happened and they are hiding it from Desmond, maybe subject 16 used a POE to travel in time and get back before Desmond to hack the system in time for Desmond to see it...

They being brothers wouldn't give 16 acess to Desmond memories in Eden...

AMuppetMatt
12-30-2010, 07:15 AM
I actually think Desmond IS 16.
For those of you who don't know me on this forum, I greatly enjoy clutching at straws, and this is my greatest clutch yet http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

Their voices are similar and when (Spoilers about the glyph things in ACB coming up... look away NOW)
___________________________
you talk to 16 with the Truth, there's a bit of dialogue that goes something like:
Desmond: "Subject 16?"
16: "Subject 17."
To me the tone was one of regretful correction, not of introductions.

)___________________ Spoilers end


Also, the way Lucy talks about 16 and the way she says "He's dead" to me suggests that the mind of 16 is dead, so it could be Desmond. It would also explain why in Ac1 there is very, VERY little of a backstory to Desmond.

Just a though... consider my clutching over http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

Mr_Stunner
12-30-2010, 08:05 AM
Originally posted by AMuppetMatt:
I actually think Desmond IS 16.
For those of you who don't know me on this forum, I greatly enjoy clutching at straws, and this is my greatest clutch yet http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

Their voices are similar and when (Spoilers about the glyph things in ACB coming up... look away NOW)
___________________________
you talk to 16 with the Truth, there's a bit of dialogue that goes something like:
Desmond: "Subject 16?"
16: "Subject 17."
To me the tone was one of regretful correction, not of introductions.

)___________________ Spoilers end


Also, the way Lucy talks about 16 and the way she says "He's dead" to me suggests that the mind of 16 is dead, so it could be Desmond. It would also explain why in Ac1 there is very, VERY little of a backstory to Desmond.

Just a though... consider my clutching over http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

Would make sense aswell, maybe subject 16 gets into shock because of the bleeding effect and forget all of his memories...
But I still think he is Desmond's son, that would explain the truth video from ACII

Xanatos2007
12-30-2010, 08:09 AM
Desmond is 25, and Sixteen sounds about the same age. 'Nuff said.

Inorganic9_2
12-30-2010, 08:12 AM
^ this

AMuppetMatt
12-30-2010, 08:16 AM
Why, because they share Adam and Eve as a common ancestor? I'm not convinced, by all means prove me wrong http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif, but I think that that's more unlikely than 16 being Desmond (And even I think that's fairly unlikely http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif )

I mean assuming that Adam and Eve and all their descendants had two children and following the Bible that the Earth is 6000 years old, with the average person living 50 years before having children, they would have a heck of a lot of common ancestors to share that memory of Desmond's. But prove me wrong http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

Mr_Stunner
12-30-2010, 08:19 AM
If you read all that I worte I said that maybe subject 16 used a POE to time travel... That would make sense, and since the POE have a lot of mystic powers time travel wouldn't be misplaced...
But that Adam and Eve memory from the truth could be after the events in 2012, subject 16 says Desmond must find Eve, maybe the world really ends and Desmond manage to survive, the ones who came before create a new ADam and Eve and Desmond goes find her, that's the video from the truth, Desmond finding Eve and calling Eve. Then maybe subject 16 is Desmond's and Eve son

AMuppetMatt
12-30-2010, 08:27 AM
In game the Templars are currently in control of one of the Piece's of Eden capable of time travel. It's unlikely there's more than one.

- I can't remember, but I think they talked in an Email in AC1 about destroying it due to the possible creation of paradoxes. It would be highly irresponsible for the Assassins to use this POE, let alone unlikely for them to capture it if in game the Templar's were thinking about destroying it in September.

- It would be highly irresponsible for the Assassins to keep the POE once their purpose has been fulfilled in saving people. My guess is that they are too powerful and they need to be destroyed. Especially something that causes time travel and causes paradoxes.

- If subject 16 is Desmond's son, he would have to travel back in time, get captured by Abstergo and then go insane (possibly) kill himself, spread blood over the walls and get (trapped?) inside the animus (or at least a fragment of him inside the animus). Would you go back in time to do that? Seems pretty pointless to me.

DarkicoN14
12-30-2010, 08:33 AM
Originally posted by AMuppetMatt:
I actually think Desmond IS 16.
For those of you who don't know me on this forum, I greatly enjoy clutching at straws, and this is my greatest clutch yet http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

Their voices are similar and when (Spoilers about the glyph things in ACB coming up... look away NOW)
___________________________
you talk to 16 with the Truth, there's a bit of dialogue that goes something like:
Desmond: "Subject 16?"
16: "Subject 17."
To me the tone was one of regretful correction, not of introductions.

)___________________ Spoilers end


Also, the way Lucy talks about 16 and the way she says "He's dead" to me suggests that the mind of 16 is dead, so it could be Desmond. It would also explain why in Ac1 there is very, VERY little of a backstory to Desmond.

Just a though... consider my clutching over http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

No 16 and desmond are not the same, they only have the same voices because nolan north does the voice for 16 and desmond

Gyro458
12-30-2010, 08:37 AM
Umm.. in AC2 when Lucy searched for the closest genetic match between Des and 16 in was Ezio. If they were brothers, their closest match would be their father and if 16 was Des' son, their closest genetic match would be Des.

So there

AMuppetMatt
12-30-2010, 08:41 AM
Originally posted by Gyro458:
Umm.. in AC2 when Lucy searched for the closest genetic match between Des and 16 in was Ezio. If they were brothers, their closest match would be their father and if 16 was Des' son, their closest genetic match would be Des.

So there

Well played. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

Although my response to that would be are you sure they were looking for a closest match... cause I don't remember that being the phrasing. Also, they needed the Vault, and Ezio was the only ancestor to see the vault, so that might be why they chose Ezio. That said, if the word "closest" was used in any of the first 10 minutes of AC2 then I will quite happily accept that my far fetched theory is... well far fetched.

Neo_Age
12-30-2010, 08:43 AM
Originally posted by AMuppetMatt:
I actually think Desmond IS 16.
For those of you who don't know me on this forum, I greatly enjoy clutching at straws, and this is my greatest clutch yet http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

Their voices are similar and when (Spoilers about the glyph things in ACB coming up... look away NOW)
___________________________
you talk to 16 with the Truth, there's a bit of dialogue that goes something like:
Desmond: "Subject 16?"
16: "Subject 17."
To me the tone was one of regretful correction, not of introductions.

)___________________ Spoilers end


Also, the way Lucy talks about 16 and the way she says "He's dead" to me suggests that the mind of 16 is dead, so it could be Desmond. It would also explain why in Ac1 there is very, VERY little of a backstory to Desmond.

Just a though... consider my clutching over http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

Subject 16 and Desmonds convo:

Considering subject 16 knows what Desmond is going through (and that the worst is yet to come for him) it isnt surprising that his tone is rather somber. I mean listen to the way two people talk to each other in regards to a situation in which one has already lived through something bad and the other is about too. Its like "yeah man, the crap your about to go through is pretty heavy...."

16's death status:

I think its the exact opposite of what you said, based on some of 16's comments towards the end. I think his body is dead (based on the amount of blood in Desmonds room and in the lab in AC1, he would have had to have lost several pints, assuming he did it all in one go) but he somehow managed to either upload or copy his mind into the animus. The interactivity that the 16 "ghost" showed was too advanced to be a recording, not to mention towards the end he mentions that he will always be with Desmond and that he is "so tired and needs to recharge". To me this strongly suggests 16's mind, at least, is very much active.

Desmonds background: The focus of the games hasnt been on Desmond to be honest. He is at best a story driving device at the moment so it doesnt make much sence to have his life story handed too use in the first game. Heck we know very little about Altiar when you think about it. Its Ezio that the games have really gone in depth with, with quite litterally starting at his birth.

I think AC:B however was the turning point in regards to Desmonds background and that the fourth game will focus more heavily on his background.

AMuppetMatt
12-30-2010, 08:49 AM
Originally posted by Neo_Age:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by AMuppetMatt:
I actually think Desmond IS 16.
For those of you who don't know me on this forum, I greatly enjoy clutching at straws, and this is my greatest clutch yet http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

Their voices are similar and when (Spoilers about the glyph things in ACB coming up... look away NOW)
___________________________
you talk to 16 with the Truth, there's a bit of dialogue that goes something like:
Desmond: "Subject 16?"
16: "Subject 17."
To me the tone was one of regretful correction, not of introductions.

)___________________ Spoilers end


Also, the way Lucy talks about 16 and the way she says "He's dead" to me suggests that the mind of 16 is dead, so it could be Desmond. It would also explain why in Ac1 there is very, VERY little of a backstory to Desmond.

Just a though... consider my clutching over http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

Subject 16 and Desmonds convo:

Considering subject 16 knows what Desmond is going through (and that the worst is yet to come for him) it isnt surprising that his tone is rather somber. I mean listen to the way two people talk to each other in regards to a situation in which one has already lived through something bad and the other is about too. Its like "yeah man, the crap your about to go through is pretty heavy...."

16's death status:

I think its the exact opposite of what you said, based on some of 16's comments towards the end. I think his body is dead (based on the amount of blood in Desmonds room and in the lab in AC1, he would have had to have lost several pints, assuming he did it all in one go) but he somehow managed to either upload or copy his mind into the animus. The interactivity that the 16 "ghost" showed was too advanced to be a recording, not to mention towards the end he mentions that he will always be with Desmond and that he is "so tired and needs to recharge". To me this strongly suggests 16's mind, at least, is very much active.

Desmonds background: The focus of the games hasnt been on Desmond to be honest. He is at best a story driving device at the moment so it doesnt make much sence to have his life story handed too use in the first game. Heck we know very little about Altiar when you think about it. Its Ezio that the games have really gone in depth with, with quite litterally starting at his birth.

I think AC:B however was the turning point in regards to Desmonds background and that the fourth game will focus more heavily on his background. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Notice the order that the animus "uploads" 16s anatomy.
"Compiling sub-systems"
"Infrastructure"
"Tendons"
"Heart"

To me this suggests that it really is a consciousness in the animus, it's not a literal heart, it's his emotional heart... if we were to link it to me theory we could say it is a copy of 16s (or in my case Desmond's) consciousness and thoughts before he lost it all and it is held unbroken within the animus... where it's safe.

Or we can link it back to your theory and do very little tweaking to make it work.

Either way, in this instance both theories work well http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

EDIT: Apparently the Xbox achievement reads in morse code "I am alive"... backs up my theory doesn't it http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QurE-EzN8vY
And if you go to 4:00 and listen to the conversation... I'm still gonna be insistent and say the way 16 laughs and says "subject 17" sounds like a correction to me

Mr_Stunner
12-30-2010, 09:01 AM
One of the Mottos of the Assassin's is sacrifice yourself for a greater good. So it would make sense subject 16 travels back in time to sacrifice himself in order to save the mankind, or in this case to purify the mankind.

Xanatos2007
12-30-2010, 09:08 AM
Maybe, but I find this theory about as easy to swallow as an aircraft carrier that's on fire.

AMuppetMatt
12-30-2010, 09:18 AM
Sorry mate, I just can't see it being so. There's just too much risk of having a paradox created in my opinion, the Assassins wouldn't risk it.

EzioOverBorgia
12-30-2010, 11:31 AM
ok to start off--subject 16 isnt desmonds son-but when u finish subject 16's puzzle the acheivement is encoded with morse code-translating to "i am alive".. and the next game is gonna be about either 2 things--1)desmond has to go to eden to find eve to make a baby with her since they are both hybrids ( meaning the ones that came before mated with humans) the hybrids contain the abilty to use eagle vision so if eve and desmond have a child--then the 1st civilization is reborn since they are both hybrids but the reason lucy was stabbed (most likly not killed) was becuase the 1st civilzation relized that he had an affection towards her and wouldnt want to go to eden so they forced him to stab her to make him beilive shes dead so he makes a baby--2) i am still questioning about this part but if that doesnt happen then AC3 will take place during the french revolution because at the end of AC:B,shan says" the masonic eye and Phaygian cap only come togethere in 1 place,which is the french consition writen during the french revolution-but at the end of AC:B during the credits you hear people talking and they say put him back in the machine even though it caused a problem..idk how to answer that part

AMuppetMatt
12-30-2010, 11:35 AM
1. Please use paragraphs and punctuation... that hurt my eyes

2. I mentioned the morse code thing and the "I am alive" thing, so next time check to make sure it hasn't already been said http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

3. 99% of your post has nothing to do with Subject 16

4. He's put back in the animus because otherwise the gamer wouldn't be able to keep on playing and replay memories... something they wanted to change with this game.

5. Welcome to the forums http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

EzioOverBorgia
12-30-2010, 11:50 AM
1) I didnt see u mentioned that-my bad i apolagize

2) It relates to subject 16

3) I never thought about it like that

4) Thanks

5) Are you saying my theorys on the next game arn't true?

AMuppetMatt
12-30-2010, 01:57 PM
No problem http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif
I'm saying your theories are unlikely. France is a possibility, if not a probability. It's on my shortlist of top 3 places it could be. The rest seems pretty far-fetched, but not much more far-fetched than what some people have come out with (heck, it's not much more far-fetched than some of the stuff I've come out with http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif )

RzaRecta357
12-30-2010, 03:57 PM
Yeah, alot of us already think Daniel Cross is subject 16 after the ending of the second issue of the fall.


We'll find out for sure after the third and final issue but as of now it's looking pretty likely.

EzioOverBorgia
12-30-2010, 07:22 PM
-_-....i dont know how you ever came up with that..daniel cross a Candian film producer

and Amuppetmatt what might your theroy be

Mr_Stunner
12-30-2010, 07:44 PM
Originally posted by EzioOverBorgia:
-_-....i dont know how you ever came up with that..daniel cross a Candian film producer

and Amuppetmatt what might your theroy be

http://lolwut.com/layout/lolwut.jpg

ChrisRigle
12-30-2010, 07:54 PM
Well, I played through and finished AC:B, and went back today to unlock 'The Truth' After being completely aggravated when I finished the video, I resorted to jump on here to find out.. Well, What the hell that was all about, or atleast some clarification.

Knowing I wasn't going to find much, all I found were theories upon theories that only make me want more answers! Needless to say, I posted to thank all of you theorists in making me want a game more then a fat kid wants a twinkie!

On a serious note, the theories definitly made me think, and it's encouraging to know that others have found as much love in this series as I did. I can't wait for the answers, but I will be coming back for more theories to enrage my thought anyway!

CharDude
12-30-2010, 11:52 PM
I always had this idea that Subject 15's baby is Desmond's son. It was never explicitly revealed what happened to her, or the baby. Just a thought. If anyone has a theory or proof that this couldn't be true, please share it with me. All these theories really fascinate me.

Mr_Stunner
12-31-2010, 10:08 AM
Originally posted by CharDude2010:
I always had this idea that Subject 15's baby is Desmond's son. It was never explicitly revealed what happened to her, or the baby. Just a thought. If anyone has a theory or proof that this couldn't be true, please share it with me. All these theories really fascinate me.

That would even make less sense than subject 16 being desmond's son...

AMuppetMatt
12-31-2010, 10:16 AM
Ok, so on the ridiculousness scale, with 10 being the most ridiculous:

Subject 16 is Desmond: 9
Subject 16 is Desmond's son: 10
Subject 16 is Desmond's and 15's son: 14
Subject 16 is some random dude who hasn't really been mentioned: 2


I like those odds http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

Mr_Stunner
01-01-2011, 08:20 AM
Subject 16 being random just would kill his importance. Maybe he is Daniel Cross

AMuppetMatt
01-01-2011, 08:27 AM
Scuse me for being ignorant, but who is this Cross guy?
I've been off the forum for a month or two to avoid spoilers for Brotherhood, so I'm curious to know what I've been missing http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

Mr_Stunner
01-01-2011, 09:19 AM
Originally posted by AMuppetMatt:
Scuse me for being ignorant, but who is this Cross guy?
I've been off the forum for a month or two to avoid spoilers for Brotherhood, so I'm curious to know what I've been missing http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

He is the main protagonist of the comic book Assassin's Creed: The Fall

AMuppetMatt
01-01-2011, 09:33 AM
Just read up on him on the AC wiki. Seems likely that it might be him, especially seeing as the devs have said he will play a major role in Desmond's story.

Mr_Stunner
01-01-2011, 01:02 PM
I read the first Assassin's Creed e mails, and I think this one farfetch's the theory where subject 16 e Daniel Cross:

Email: "Tunguska Incident - Now believed to be the direct result of assault by Assassins. Research station destroyed as was artefact. Alternate wave generation devices have been located in storage, but we have insufficient data at the moment to initiate research. The risk of accident is too high.

Lineage Discovery and Acquisition Division should attempt to locate descendents of any attack survivors (either Assassin or Brotherhood) in order to continue research. Resurrecting this particular type of technology will aid us greatly with any holdouts following the Satellite's activation. We're putting together a team to push research in this area."

If Daniel Cross is Subject 16 indeed, Abstergo had already knew about the Tugunks incident, this e mails proves they don't know yet...

AMuppetMatt
01-01-2011, 01:16 PM
Either that or Ubi forgot about this Email, planned it to be Cross and will read this in a weeks time and have to re-write their entire plans for whatever AC is being released this year and then AC3 http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

Speaking of which, according to that ever reliable source of Wikipedia it looks like there WILL be a console release of AC in 2011... looks like we're set to play as Ezio one more time.

mastesergeant
01-01-2011, 01:25 PM
So, you're saying that Desmond had a kid when he was somewhere around 5 years old, speaking that he's 25?

AMuppetMatt
01-01-2011, 01:33 PM
Nah they're saying that his kid time traveled. Desmond has a kid at a normal age and when his kid grows up he goes back in time to be captured by Abstergo and then go insane...

Mr_Stunner
01-01-2011, 01:33 PM
Originally posted by mastesergeant:
So, you're saying that Desmond had a kid when he was somewhere around 5 years old, speaking that he's 25?

No,I sugested that subject 16 maybe used a POE to time travel

SAVMATIC
01-01-2011, 03:58 PM
lol, subject 16 is not a "random dude" hes one of the most interesting and important characters to the story...
Its a fact that he has imprinted his consciousness into the animus(you can verify this in the game guide), even though his physical body is dead.
Also I dont see how a game coming out in 2011 is somehow automatically more Ezio? Clearly the next time period is the French Revolution, as the two symbols at the end are MEANT to be interpreted as such, and again you can verify this in a game guide, along with LOTS of unofficial sources saying that where were headed next.

EzioOverBorgia
01-01-2011, 11:12 PM
Muppet...i doubt that we will play as Ezio again because of 2 things

1. Ezio is 50 years old

2. Ubisoft probably doesn't want to use the same main character for 3 times

hook53
01-02-2011, 01:24 AM
Your theories is false. Rebbeca and Shaun are both Templars while Lucy is an assassin. In an email Shaun reveals Rebbeca to be a Templar, and the only way he would know this, is if he was a Templar himself.
I also believe that Lucy is subject 16 in disguise. The two men talking at the end of the game are William from Lucy's email and Euritido from Desmond's email. They are talking about putting Lucy(subject 16) back into the animus because you are not playing as desmond in the present time like you think you are. You are seeing the past experiences of her as she sees them in the animus. She is forced to enter the animus because she is being held hostage by Templars shortly after they find the apple of eden

bokeef04
01-02-2011, 01:47 AM
Originally posted by SAVMATIC:
lol, subject 16 is not a "random dude" hes one of the most interesting and important characters to the story...
Its a fact that he has imprinted his consciousness into the animus(you can verify this in the game guide), even though his physical body is dead.
Also I dont see how a game coming out in 2011 is somehow automatically more Ezio? Clearly the next time period is the French Revolution, as the two symbols at the end are MEANT to be interpreted as such, and again you can verify this in a game guide, along with LOTS of unofficial sources saying that where were headed next.

just because they put those 2 symbols there pointing to 18th century France doesn't mean they will go there, it could be a deliberate means to make people think it will be in France so that when they reveal the next location it will be a shock and unexpected, correct me if I'm wrong but was their anything in AC1 pointing to Renaissance Italy being the next time period?

as the two symbols at the end are MEANT to be interpreted as such, and again you can verify this in a game guide
the game guide actually say's word for word "Is the apple pointing the way to 18th Century France?" not the apple is pointing the way to 18th Century France, it is a question not a statement, maybe there is another place the two come together that the Templars have hidden, or shaun doesn't know about, maybe they mean completely different things to TWCB, for all we know that signifies two regions/forces, maybe they were the first symbols used by the Assassin's and Templars

AMuppetMatt
01-02-2011, 05:06 AM
Originally posted by EzioOverBorgia:
Muppet...i doubt that we will play as Ezio again because of 2 things

1. Ezio is 50 years old

2. Ubisoft probably doesn't want to use the same main character for 3 times

1. They're releasing a console version of Assassins Creed in 2011, AC3 is confirmed for 2012

2. At the beginning of the game Desmond sees Ezio revisit the Villa but we don't find out why. He's much older when he does.

3. Ezio's voice actor is working on one more game for Ubisfoft.



Unless we're playing as Ezio's 5 year old son/daughter in the next game we're playing as Ezio again.

Mr_Stunner
01-02-2011, 04:29 PM
The actor may be working on Assassin's Creed for the 3DS

EzioOverBorgia
01-03-2011, 04:53 PM
Originally posted by hook53:
Your theories is false. Rebbeca and Shaun are both Templars while Lucy is an assassin. In an email Shaun reveals Rebbeca to be a Templar, and the only way he would know this, is if he was a Templar himself.
I also believe that Lucy is subject 16 in disguise. The two men talking at the end of the game are William from Lucy's email and Euritido from Desmond's email. They are talking about putting Lucy(subject 16) back into the animus because you are not playing as desmond in the present time like you think you are. You are seeing the past experiences of her as she sees them in the animus. She is forced to enter the animus because she is being held hostage by Templars shortly after they find the apple of eden

16 is a guy
idk about the email

EzioOverBorgia
01-03-2011, 04:55 PM
Originally posted by AMuppetMatt:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by EzioOverBorgia:
Muppet...i doubt that we will play as Ezio again because of 2 things

1. Ezio is 50 years old

2. Ubisoft probably doesn't want to use the same main character for 3 times

1. They're releasing a console version of Assassins Creed in 2011, AC3 is confirmed for 2012

2. At the beginning of the game Desmond sees Ezio revisit the Villa but we don't find out why. He's much older when he does.

3. Ezio's voice actor is working on one more game for Ubisfoft.



Unless we're playing as Ezio's 5 year old son/daughter in the next game we're playing as Ezio again. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
so he can write the code on the wall for the vault containing the apple?

EzioOverBorgia
01-04-2011, 08:39 PM
Originally posted by hook53:
Your theories is false. Rebbeca and Shaun are both Templars while Lucy is an assassin. In an email Shaun reveals Rebbeca to be a Templar, and the only way he would know this, is if he was a Templar himself.
I also believe that Lucy is subject 16 in disguise. The two men talking at the end of the game are William from Lucy's email and Euritido from Desmond's email. They are talking about putting Lucy(subject 16) back into the animus because you are not playing as desmond in the present time like you think you are. You are seeing the past experiences of her as she sees them in the animus. She is forced to enter the animus because she is being held hostage by Templars shortly after they find the apple of eden
Shaun said that as a joke since Rebbecca ratted him out on eating Lucy's yogurts