PDA

View Full Version : 109k or g-10 what is your favorite and why?



jessi1
06-02-2005, 08:41 AM
Hey all was wondering what is your choice the k-4 or the g-10 and why you prefer the model, and hayateace no need for you to respond cause we all know you get your butt handed to you no matter the 109 variant. Also what is your convergence for mgs only and do you think they may fix the elevator response in the new patch when it come out on the ??.

jessi1
06-02-2005, 08:41 AM
Hey all was wondering what is your choice the k-4 or the g-10 and why you prefer the model, and hayateace no need for you to respond cause we all know you get your butt handed to you no matter the 109 variant. Also what is your convergence for mgs only and do you think they may fix the elevator response in the new patch when it come out on the ??.

WOLFMondo
06-02-2005, 09:23 AM
Not a big 109 fan but I do like flying the F's. They just fly nicely, have nice characteristics and there mean little dogfighters.

JG53Frankyboy
06-02-2005, 09:45 AM
i would take the K4.
only brutal power helps in my flying style of 109s - i only fight vertical and there the K4 is very good.
and there is nothing to fix with its elevator - just rimm for manouver, like the real pilots alos did.

perhaps, if the MG151/20 will get a little bit more hitting power , the Bf109G6/AS (actually a G14/AS, the real G6/AS had no MW50 ) will be the chioce.

VW-IceFire
06-02-2005, 10:26 AM
I suck at the 109 but if given the choice between the K-4 and the G-10...I'd take the G-10. Its better balanced between power and manueverability. The K-4 used to be a favoured ride till I found the FW190.

I'm annoyed that most servers neglect the G-10.

JG52Uther
06-02-2005, 10:29 AM
G10,but my favourite late war would be the G6/AS.Early war you cant beat the E4 for coolness http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

Atomic_Marten
06-02-2005, 10:42 AM
I prefer G10. Of course, I will switch to K4 without second thought if oposition requires so. If better performance is needed.

I mostly choose my favourite fighter by it look. There are some other criteria, but that one is most important for me. Well, that is good example of difference between game and RL situation.http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

I would lie to you if I say 'well you know I'm objective -- my G10 is better than K4 because of that and that'. It is not but I like the look of G10. Plain G6 (non-Erla-hood version) is my favourite all time Bf109 because I find it to be visually the most attractive variant.
Unfortunately in the game G6 seems to be "at par" or maybe even inferior to some oposite fighters. Relatively maybe more than any other Bf109 variant in the game.

Convergence for Bf109 nose MG's? Currently 377m.

About elevator response, I do not know if that needs to be fixed. I mean most of the fighters in game suffer badly from elevator lock up at high speed (P-38 is among most affected).

JG53Frankyboy
06-02-2005, 10:52 AM
without gondolas ............ try 1000m , no joke http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

Atomic_Marten
06-02-2005, 11:04 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by JG53Frankyboy:
without gondolas ............ try 1000m , no joke http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Why not even with gondollas? There is certain number of regular guys that have their FW190 convergence on 1000m for outer wing guns.
If the wing weapon is powerful enough (20mm-30mm), it can be set on very high conv. as well as 1000.

However like many guys have stated, for nose weapons conv. plays much lesser role than for wing mounted weapons.
Some say that it is good for MK108/MG151/15 to set on higher conv. because of flatter trajectory, but I suppose that is the matter of habit.

PBNA-Boosher
06-02-2005, 02:25 PM
G-10, it's closer in look to the G-14/AS that my friend Gottfried flew.

XyZspineZyX
06-02-2005, 03:54 PM
G10 all the way, I turn at par with spits, has gobs of power

BBB_Hyperion
06-02-2005, 09:05 PM
K , cause it is still the best .)

TAGERT.
06-02-2005, 11:00 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by jessi1:
Hey all was wondering what is your choice the k-4 or the g-10 and why you prefer the model, and hayateace no need for you to respond cause we all know you get your butt handed to you no matter the 109 variant. Also what is your convergence for mgs only and do you think they may fix the elevator response in the new patch when it come out on the ??. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>I like the K and the way it does a flat turn in less than 30sec at 6000m

mole_boy
06-03-2005, 12:00 AM
I like the K-4 because you have superior performance over just about anyone @ high alt whereas with the G-10 you are similar in perfomance to most late war fighters.

JG52_Helgstrand
06-03-2005, 12:22 AM
Out of the G-10 and K-4, I'd take a G-6/AS http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

BBB_Hyperion
06-03-2005, 01:05 AM
G6/AS is for low alt Turners that never get over 4 km the whole flight. So your day is ruined once you meet a p47 or p51 at medium alt with a half way decent pilot. You will be outspeeded and dive limits kick in faster than in k4. Turning doesnt help much then.

K4 is better suited for all kinds of engagements with the ability to turn tables and withdraw in most cases.