PDA

View Full Version : (ONLINE?)Ubisoft, Please make online pvp or co-op avaliable



soccerkid82792
11-13-2007, 05:35 PM
By the reviews im guessing there is no online feature where you can fight with or against another person. I really want to play the game...so im thinking about just renting it, but i would really like it to have a lasting appeal to it. so all those of you who agree and have ideas, please post. :-)

chickmgnt222
11-13-2007, 05:39 PM
Well, I don't think the game mechanics could really work for either co-op or pvp. *shrugs*

Although, freerunning races would be neat http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

Faylinks
11-13-2007, 05:40 PM
Eh its ubisofts downfall to have a real success full game

its just another bioshock, rent it, beat it, return it. nothing more to it.

i would have greatly enjoyed a steath/combat capture the flag game in the cites and such

i think if they really wanted to, they could make the game mechanics work with multiplayer, and if they are that incapable of that, what about online co op?

Or a 2 player online co op or something

in a large scale, single player games do not do as well as multiplayer games, ubisofts stupidity in not making a multiplayer aspect of the game will make many just rent it, and fewer buy it.

Rogue4152
11-13-2007, 05:54 PM
if it was coop they have to make it much harder. like say the target will be escorted by 10 guards and 10 bowman. and will have a horse by him. so the players would need to work together

but since theres no multiplayer in Ac1, just hope for some in ac2

chickmgnt222
11-13-2007, 05:55 PM
Originally posted by Faylinks:
in a large scale, single player games do not do as well as multiplayer games, ubisofts stupidity in not making a multiplayer aspect of the game will make many just rent it, and fewer buy it.

They could keep it going with modabillity. Look at The Elder Scrolls series.

Faylinks
11-13-2007, 06:08 PM
Originally posted by chickmgnt222:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Faylinks:
in a large scale, single player games do not do as well as multiplayer games, ubisofts stupidity in not making a multiplayer aspect of the game will make many just rent it, and fewer buy it.

They could keep it going with modabillity. Look at The Elder Scrolls series. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

i have no idea how much a game gets if it takes of in mutiplayer, so many people getting xbox live for 1 game

why not have the best of both words, great mutiplayer + great single player?

halo 3 is totaly mutiplayer, the storyline/storyline gameplay is horrid, but the multiplayer is one of the best yet. think how well a great game with both mutiplayer and single player would do.

FacedJared
11-13-2007, 06:35 PM
*cough* CoD 4

fruni
11-13-2007, 07:49 PM
halo storyline was awesome? campain in three was fun to beet with all the skulls on but effin TOUGH

NECESARY_EVIL
11-13-2007, 07:56 PM
Actually ubi, just go ahead and ignore this discussion

StealthyFisher
11-13-2007, 07:59 PM
Originally posted by NECESARY_EVIL:
Actually ubi, just go ahead and ignore this discussion

Dude i agree with you http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/agreepost.gif

unnamedninja
11-13-2007, 08:08 PM
I cant really see how on earth assassin's would benefit from multiplayer. RPGs yes, FPS yes, racing/sports sims yes, story driven adventure game, no!

Capture the flag in assassins, what next? camel racing? Seriously thumbs down, some games are just meant to be enjoyed solo.

elvenmonkey13
11-13-2007, 08:09 PM
Camel racing would be awesome!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/winky.gif

ImpulsePainter
11-13-2007, 08:32 PM
Originally posted by Faylinks:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by chickmgnt222:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Faylinks:
in a large scale, single player games do not do as well as multiplayer games, ubisofts stupidity in not making a multiplayer aspect of the game will make many just rent it, and fewer buy it.

They could keep it going with modabillity. Look at The Elder Scrolls series. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

i have no idea how much a game gets if it takes of in mutiplayer, so many people getting xbox live for 1 game

why not have the best of both words, great mutiplayer + great single player?

halo 3 is totaly mutiplayer, the storyline/storyline gameplay is horrid, but the multiplayer is one of the best yet. think how well a great game with both mutiplayer and single player would do. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Are you kidding?!? The Multiplayer on Halo 3 is the most atrocious of all the series. The melee system is broken, the maps promote camping like non other, the list goes on and on, and they could fix all of them in DLC, but they haven't yet, and they're losing so many players. The campaign on the other hand was one of the best, it had great story, gameplay, online co-op, and it worked great.

The multi-player on AC wouldn't work in DLC mainly because it'd just transform it into a Mortal Kombat where you can run away and sneak back up on your opponent. As for the free running races, it'd be pretty cool. I can understand them dedicating the 2nd one to a more multi-player friendly environment, but this is setting the bar and the story for it.

soccerkid82792
11-14-2007, 04:48 PM
i would really like to see some kind of multiplayer addition through playstation network, even if it requires paying 5-6 bucks...though i dought they will...im just praying they have multiplayer in acii

knife_X
11-14-2007, 05:10 PM
Coop is not that far fetched... just add another guy in a white robe and send him along. Kinda like they did Crackdown!

soccerkid82792
11-14-2007, 08:43 PM
ya

Sterski
11-17-2007, 05:54 PM
FREERUNNING RACES THROUGH JERUSELUM



awsome

Ace426
11-17-2007, 05:56 PM
I could see a online cat and mouse thing 1 guy is the assassian 1 guy is target others are guards assassian kills target it become cat and mouse

luke100
11-17-2007, 05:59 PM
the online lobby was the cities
you can start your own lobby
have team capture the flag like 3 teams on in each city first team to get all 3 wins

Stillzero
11-17-2007, 06:06 PM
Originally posted by Faylinks:
Eh its ubisofts downfall to have a real success full game

its just another bioshock, rent it, beat it, return it. nothing more to it.

i would have greatly enjoyed a steath/combat capture the flag game in the cites and such

i think if they really wanted to, they could make the game mechanics work with multiplayer, and if they are that incapable of that, what about online co op?

Or a 2 player online co op or something

in a large scale, single player games do not do as well as multiplayer games, ubisofts stupidity in not making a multiplayer aspect of the game will make many just rent it, and fewer buy it.

Get your head out of your arse.
Making a multiplayer for a game where you have to tag everything in the map that sticks out more then 3 inches takes WAY too much processing power to host it on a server.
People who whine and moan about Assassins Creed not having a Multiplayer need to start realising that we're not dealing with a simplistic game like Halo 3 here but with a much much more complicated engine wich you can't simply run smoothly on a online server.

The game is made for singleplayer and i'm thanking god of the fact that they focussed only on the singleplayer because most games that try to eat of both sides tend to really suck in one or the other (i.e The Darkness) Halo 3 might pull this off nicely if you rule out the fact that it's an average shooter with a criminally short singleplayer, but that's about it.

So stop whining, if you want to player mediocre "casual gamer" games that's more like an indecisive tranvestive prostituete then go get the hell out of here and register on another forum.