PDA

View Full Version : Assymetric thrust - He-111



XyZspineZyX
07-03-2003, 02:04 PM
This topic has been raised a few times, but I never really found any consistent/satisfactory answer from the development team, so, please excuse me, but here it goes again...:

- Single engine operation on the He-111, with or without feathering the failled engine prop, require almost none, if any at all, opposite rudder. Even if the "good" engine is maxed, there is just a slight hint of assymetric thrust effects. I strongly believe this is way out of sync with reality, and I think it should get considered on a future patch.

- I repeat the same regarding the Sovietic T-3.

- Ah! And although I am not sure if it is realistic or not, the engine-out performance of the Me-262 is trully... decaying ;-) I can't get the thing going with just one turbine up & running. ????


Comments, Oleg reply, really apprecieted!

XyZspineZyX
07-03-2003, 02:04 PM
This topic has been raised a few times, but I never really found any consistent/satisfactory answer from the development team, so, please excuse me, but here it goes again...:

- Single engine operation on the He-111, with or without feathering the failled engine prop, require almost none, if any at all, opposite rudder. Even if the "good" engine is maxed, there is just a slight hint of assymetric thrust effects. I strongly believe this is way out of sync with reality, and I think it should get considered on a future patch.

- I repeat the same regarding the Sovietic T-3.

- Ah! And although I am not sure if it is realistic or not, the engine-out performance of the Me-262 is trully... decaying ;-) I can't get the thing going with just one turbine up & running. ????


Comments, Oleg reply, really apprecieted!

XyZspineZyX
07-03-2003, 04:23 PM
DRAGGGGGGG is the key my friend, of course there is assymetric trust, its not only the prop that gives drag but the whole plane, of course there is assymetric trust, the plane will find a way that has the elast drag, so it may fly a bit out of course.. and turbn a little too.


damn its hard to explain in english


<center>http://rumandmonkey.com/widgets/tests/criminal/pinochet.jpg
Which Evil Criminal are You? (http://rumandmonkey.com/widgets/tests/criminal/)</center>

<center><a
╒══════╣By Rik╠══Φ═══╕
♣╦ ╠╣@ ╙g¨πd h↑▲▲é└╒ ♣
╘═════════════Φ═══╛</a></center>

XyZspineZyX
07-03-2003, 05:15 PM
Regardless of what language you use, icomm is absolutely right! Just try this: Start one engine on the Heinkel and taxi around. It's just as easy to do as if both engines are going. That's just not right. As for the 262, I can't comment, other than to say that single engine performance seems a bit weak, but I have no idea what it was really like in RL.

XyZspineZyX
07-03-2003, 07:20 PM
you should be able to land a 262 on one engine... the current drag modelling is apparently to do with a limitation of the game engine... let us hope that it is not so limited after the next patch

XyZspineZyX
07-08-2003, 02:28 PM
Bump!

UBI Team! What do you say????

XyZspineZyX
07-09-2003, 11:30 AM
Bump again.... Oleg is back... maybe he reads it now...!!!

XyZspineZyX
07-09-2003, 05:23 PM
The topic about the 262 engine-out performance was raised several times. It's really annoying. I know the problem has to do with game engine limitations, nevertheless I hope it will be fixed. (together with the AI 262's who dont't abort takeoff procedure with only one engine running. In the campaign I have lot's of losses because of this. It's kind of funny when the 262's drive through the countryside until they explode somewhere in a forest or a city...)

http://www.bmlv.gv.at/images/flagge.gif


http://www.metalforum-austria.net/vbb/attachment.php?s=&postid=15243