PDA

View Full Version : Luft '46



Skullin
10-08-2004, 04:21 PM
not sure if this link has been posted before or not, but pretty cool site here...

http://luft46.com/

http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/11.gif

lil_labbit
10-08-2004, 04:23 PM
http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/53.gif only a zillion times...

So what's your favourite ?
I like the AmericaBomber http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif
http://meltingpot.fortunecity.com/seymour/32/sangerny.html

Cajun76
10-08-2004, 05:50 PM
Look through the Axis plane list, you'll even see a couple. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-wink.gif

We need a couple of advanced Allied planes too. Some of them even saw real combat action, like the P-47N and P-47M. The only one I know of is the YP-80 that's in the game for the Allies now. Of course, the Axis ones are "operational" versions like the Go-229 and Me-109Z. http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif The YP-80 is classified as "expiremental", even though it flew some missions. It cracks me up when some loud mouthed know-it-all whines about Oleg's Allied a/c "bias".

Cool site though, but many of those designs would never get off the napkin they were sketched on. Desperation breeds inovation. http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-wink.gif

WUAF_Badsight
10-08-2004, 07:21 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Cajun76:
It cracks me up when some loud mouthed know-it-all whines about Oleg's Allied a/c "bias". <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

oh jeez . . . . .

Maddox Games staff didnt make the Bi-1 or Go-229 or YP-80 , but the did give the FM to those allied A/C you see being talked about http://img32.exs.cx/img32/1489/tug.gif

TAGERT.
10-08-2004, 09:32 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by WUAF_Badsight:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Cajun76:
It cracks me up when some loud mouthed know-it-all whines about Oleg's Allied a/c "bias". <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

oh jeez . . . . .

Maddox Games staff didnt make the Bi-1 or Go-229 or YP-80 , but the did give the FM to those allied A/C you see being talked about http://img32.exs.cx/img32/1489/tug.gif <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>You missed his point.. Pretty simple.. There is no ALLIED BIAS! If there was they wouldnt have takin Gibbages P80 3D art and down graded it to a YP80.. Where the YP80 didnt have dive breaks.. Even though Gibbages orginal 3D art had them in there.. Now before you give me all your *reasons* to justify that move.. First give me your *reasons* to justify the 109Z.. In that it should be a hoot to see the hipcrocy between the two lists.. So in summary there is no ALLIED BIAS.. But there may be some ANTI-ALLIED BIAS! http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

PraetorHonoris
10-08-2004, 10:25 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by TAGERT.:
Pretty simple.. There is no ALLIED BIAS! <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

What Mr. Maddox said about US-Planes:
"We give the best effience of elevator on High speed for P-51" -30.06.2004, "Cheating Stops right here"
"In some ways P-38 in our sim flyes better than should in real" - 04.10.2004 "purely pathetic, should..."
"P-47 now do better rollrate than should on low speeds" - 04.10.2004 "purely pathetic, should..."

and about whiners:
"Percentage of the US whinnes is way greater than German whinnes...." - 01.07.2004, €žCheating Stops right here€œ

WUAF_Badsight
10-08-2004, 10:53 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by TAGERT.:
So in summary there is no ALLIED BIAS... <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

yet another person who has not flowen in the VEF

you actually believe that Tagert ?

TAGERT.
10-08-2004, 10:58 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by WUAF_Badsight:
yet another person who has not flowen in the VEF

you actually believe that Tagert ? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>What is not to belive? No more and no less than the rest IMHO

WUAF_Badsight
10-08-2004, 11:00 PM
well your opinion is really wack

the only fighter in FB that doesnt have a better-than-RL climb time is . . . . wait for it . . . . the FW-190 ! ! ! ! !

& thats just a start

LStarosta
10-08-2004, 11:09 PM
http://snl.jt.org/arc/char/ChOt-Nadeen.jpg

Simma DOWN nah!

TAGERT.
10-08-2004, 11:09 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by WUAF_Badsight:
well your opinion is really wack <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>That is just your opinion of my opinion.. to which your welcome, but I disagree with

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by WUAF_Badsight:
the only fighter in FB that doesnt have a better-than-RL climb time is . . . . wait for it . . . . the FW-190 ! ! ! ! !

& thats just a start <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Got Track? Are we not limiting this topic to climb rates?

WUAF_Badsight
10-09-2004, 02:48 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by TAGERT.:
Got Track? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
go test : )

MEGILE
10-09-2004, 06:04 AM
All words, no substance..

Love it! http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/35.gif

I have no idea why this thread degraded into the argument, it seems some people like to waste their time on fruitless discussions...

however to the original poster, ty for the website.. very interesting indeed http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif