PDA

View Full Version : Oleg what do you think about ....



XyZspineZyX
10-27-2003, 10:30 AM
Hi!
Oleg I have a question to you. What do you think about climb rate all planes in patch 1.11 compare it to database from FB? You think is these correct? Or climb rate will be correct in future addon? I didn't see any info about these.

One person make a several comparision about climb rate in FB. Here a link:

http://oldsite.simhq.com/simhq3/sims/boards/bbs/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=98;t=004181


I play in I2 from about 2 years. These is beatiful game and surly the best sim of WW2. Now I'm playing in FB and worry about it FM after 1.11 patch. I'm flying diffrent planes not olny one side (red or blue). I think that patch 1.1B was better in FM/DM of same aspect (climb rate, weapons damage model).

XyZspineZyX
10-27-2003, 10:30 AM
Hi!
Oleg I have a question to you. What do you think about climb rate all planes in patch 1.11 compare it to database from FB? You think is these correct? Or climb rate will be correct in future addon? I didn't see any info about these.

One person make a several comparision about climb rate in FB. Here a link:

http://oldsite.simhq.com/simhq3/sims/boards/bbs/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=98;t=004181


I play in I2 from about 2 years. These is beatiful game and surly the best sim of WW2. Now I'm playing in FB and worry about it FM after 1.11 patch. I'm flying diffrent planes not olny one side (red or blue). I think that patch 1.1B was better in FM/DM of same aspect (climb rate, weapons damage model).

XyZspineZyX
10-27-2003, 10:36 AM
No major differences in 1.2. Just small.

Oleg Maddox
1C:Maddox Games

XyZspineZyX
10-27-2003, 10:41 AM
Thank for your replay.

It is very pity that no changes in FM expecially climb rate http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_frown.gif

Oleg these is because yor team have planty of work or climb rate in 1.11 is correct?

XyZspineZyX
10-27-2003, 01:30 PM
"Oleg these is because yor team have planty of work or climb rate in 1.11 is correct?"

He must think it is correct, wouldn't you say? http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif



S!
609IAP_Recon

Forgotten Skies Virtual War
Forum: http://fogwar.luftwaffe.net/forums/index.php
Website: http://www.forgottenskies.com
Visit 609IAP at http://takeoff.to/609IAP

http://www.leeboats.com/609/sig/609_recon3.jpg

Agnus Dei, Qui Tollis peccata mundi, Miserere nobis. Dona nobis pacem

XyZspineZyX
10-28-2003, 05:24 PM
So it's no hope here http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_frown.gif



"The truth is out there"

ZG77_Nagual
10-28-2003, 07:16 PM
I've been digging on this issue a little - particularly about the p39 - and I have to say the more info I see the more I lean toward thinking the simm is not far off and that small changes are all thats needed. Lately I've been making a point of flying against p39s - mostly in a 190a5 vs p39n1s (to be honest - the type is not much of a problem on '44 servers in the a9, dora etc.)It is very tough to beat a well flown p39 in the 190 unless you have and keep a good alt advantage. But it can be done - and my reading is convincing me most of the 39's bad rap comes from bad tactics against an enemy with superior position, training and numbers in an aircraft designed for those tactics

http://pws.chartermi.net/~cmorey/pics/whiner.jpg