PDA

View Full Version : WHY THE Flyable SPB in the Expansion Pac. ?



XyZspineZyX
12-06-2003, 09:43 AM
Are you Kidding me ! Out of all the Great Bombers of ww2 you waste time on this !

XyZspineZyX
12-06-2003, 09:43 AM
Are you Kidding me ! Out of all the Great Bombers of ww2 you waste time on this !

XyZspineZyX
12-06-2003, 09:45 AM
Considering we already HAD an TB-3,it wouldn't take much effort to convert it to a SPB. Only external difference I've seen are different engine nacelles and I-16 racks.

<center>47|FC <img src="http://rangerring.com/wwii/p-47.jpg"<

XyZspineZyX
12-06-2003, 09:53 AM
necrobaron wrote:
- Considering we already HAD an TB-3,it wouldn't take
- much effort to convert it to a SPB.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I can understand this thinking if it was a free patch But not when it's a "PAID" add on !

XyZspineZyX
12-06-2003, 10:03 AM
Another baby diaper needs changing.

XyZspineZyX
12-07-2003, 07:38 AM
AGREED LEXX

XyZspineZyX
12-07-2003, 09:40 AM
So who's on nappy duty at the mo?
I hereby nominate Badsight...hehehe
/i/smilies/16x16_man-very-happy.gif /i/smilies/16x16_man-very-happy.gif

WUAF_Badsight wrote:
- AGREED LEXX



--------------------
"'There are no atheists in foxholes' isn't an argument against atheists, its an argument against foxholes" -- John Morrow.

Sean "Goodwood" Nash, Owner/Operator:
http://ww2flight.org/ww2ban.JPGhttp://www.ww2flight.org</A>

Get My Custom Skins Here:
http://www.il2skins.com/?action=list&authoridfilter=Goodwood&ts=1061538651&comefrom=credits

XyZspineZyX
12-07-2003, 02:34 PM
O-NO wrote:
- Are you Kidding me ! Out of all the Great Bombers
- of ww2 you waste time on this !


Oh... the ignorance... it burns, OH GOD IT BURNS!!!

XyZspineZyX
12-07-2003, 04:07 PM
O-NO wrote:
- Are you Kidding me ! Out of all the Great Bombers
- of ww2 you waste time on this !
-
-

YEAH THANX OLEG !! /i/smilies/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif

lil_labbit
<center> http://members.home.nl/lil.labbit/lilseesya.jpg
Night is better than Day</center>

XyZspineZyX
12-07-2003, 04:47 PM
And he comes into my thread and bad mouths me and calls me the idiot?

pffffffffft


I for one am perfectly happy with any new and different aircraft we can have. And the possibility of launching during a mission from the wing of some fata$$ bomber is very interesting.

True, it would be nice to have more flyable bombers. But thats not entirely up to Oleg and crew. Those big bombers take a long time to complete, and I'm guessing that they weren't ready in time for this add-on. But there is still time, so we'll have to see.

But good of you to start complaining now, 3 months before the add-on is expected. /i/smilies/16x16_smiley-tongue.gif

<html>
<body>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.ghostskies.com">http://www.rmutt.netfirms.com/crash2.gif
</body>
</html>

XyZspineZyX
12-07-2003, 04:48 PM
O-NO wrote:
- necrobaron wrote:
-- Considering we already HAD an TB-3,it wouldn't take
-- much effort to convert it to a SPB.
- <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
- >>>>>
-
- I can understand this thinking if it was a free
- patch But not when it's a "PAID" add on !
-
-
-
-

Then don't buy it.

Regards,

SkyChimp

http://members.cox.net/rowlandparks/chimpy_2.jpg

XyZspineZyX
12-07-2003, 11:51 PM
SkyChimp wrote:
-
-
- Then don't buy it.
-
-


Sound advice. My advice is to take it! /i/smilies/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif

<center>http://homepage.ntlworld.com/paul.bryant3/ETSigHolland.gif

A7N8XDeluxe2.0, Athlon XP2600, 512MB 'some brand' DDR400, Radeon 9600pro on 500Mhz, Soundstorm, logitech crap.</center>

XyZspineZyX
12-08-2003, 12:34 AM
What we have here is Failure to communicate....
At this point in the scheme Oleg and company [weasel word coming] for the most part is not providing ANY new planes.

The new planes are the creations and pet projects of numerous dedicated 3D modeling "Fans" of the game. 1C: is integrating the flight characteristics and packaging them together along with some bonus material and selling this next disk as an add-on. I'm assuming here but I don't think the add-on will require you to upgrade to play online with others, except for some of the missions

What does this means for you and this thread.. The "choices are governed by, and at the generosity of, the 3-rd party modelers and what you GET is what THEY want to see/fly.

Don't go overboard on your criticism and be glad that
A- 3rd party modelers are doing ANYTHING
B- Oleg and 1C: is spending their time integrating ANY of the 3rd party models into HIS game


In the words of Theodore Roosevelt "I want to see you shoot the way you shout."
Or
I'd like to see the posts where you COMPLIMENT Oleg for all the things you like with the same vehemence of the posts where you COMPLAIN to Oleg for all the things you don't like


"It is well that war is so terrible, lest we grow too fond of it."
-- Robert E. Lee

Virtual Movie Forum at http://www.blacksheepwebdesign.net/VirtualWarCinema/


http://jrjacobs.mystarband.net/images/squad%20logo.jpg

ZG77_Nagual
12-08-2003, 12:50 AM
What's missing from this thread is the answer to the original question - the answer is

BECAUSE IT's COOL

One of the things this simm is about is cool planes maybe alot of us didn't know much about.

http://pws.chartermi.net/~cmorey/pics/whiner.jpg

XyZspineZyX
12-10-2003, 02:25 AM
Don't forget the turret in the extreme tail as well http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif