PDA

View Full Version : He-111 incoerences



XyZspineZyX
07-13-2003, 10:03 PM
Hi for all, will be resolved this incoerences with update?

Tx and Byes



http://www.iespana.es/Fliegerkorp1/imagenes_aviones/He111_incoerences_1.gif



PD: Sorry for the large image

XyZspineZyX
07-13-2003, 10:03 PM
Hi for all, will be resolved this incoerences with update?

Tx and Byes



http://www.iespana.es/Fliegerkorp1/imagenes_aviones/He111_incoerences_1.gif



PD: Sorry for the large image

XyZspineZyX
07-13-2003, 11:25 PM
Probably not, these changes would requiere to change the whole 3D model.

1 Judge not, that ye be not judged.
2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye
shall be judged: and with what
measure ye mete, it shall be
measured to you again.

http://members.chello.se/ven/ham-pin.gif

XyZspineZyX
07-18-2003, 02:14 AM
id like to see that fixed, and oleg spend more time on the bombers, like the diff He-111 models and the Ju-88

Leutnant Schlageter

KG 54 "Totenlopf Operations Offizer

XyZspineZyX
07-18-2003, 02:44 AM
No not the blueprints again noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
sorry, I'm just traumatized from the FW thread.
I believe it should be changed, although it's small stuff, and after the FW pit endless discution, Oleg will never listen to minor glitches again /i/smilies/16x16_smiley-sad.gif

XyZspineZyX
07-18-2003, 07:08 AM
Hi:

1. About the retractable top gunner windshiled (the caterpilar style), it was done, but aparently didn't make it to the final version, I am unsure why. There seems to be some anomalies between my final model and the present one. Will talk again to Oleg about it.

2. Only some H-6 had dual Mgs on the gondola (as depicted on your drawings. Since they were manned by the same person and could be quite hard to integrate in the SIM, I left it out. There is really no need for it really (in the game, one hardly uses the nose one).

3. The H-3 was modelled (with the ventral MG/FF) but didn't make to the game (yet). Other versions are planned (like H-11), but I have little time at present and not enough good refferences (internal). I doubt Oleg can spend any time on them.

4. No corrections on external will be done. Too much trouble for little gain. This may change in the future of more variants are added.

5. Although the top gun canopy could be slided fowards, there was not a 360 degrees firing angle. MAybe there should be a bit more downwards, but the rest as it is in FB is good. (you could have more angle, but no aiming with it. There is hardly any room for the gunner to move around with it and aim)

6. The H-6 didn't have a MG/FF in the gondola. Neither did the H-6 have a mg firing forward on the gondola. Although there were some changes on this depending on manufacture areas or field changes.

<img src=http://www.silence.plus.com/xanty/stuff/fb_falco.jpg>

XyZspineZyX
07-18-2003, 07:25 AM
Xanty that Cr.42 looks F****** BEAUTIFUL!!!!!!!!!!!!! are you modeling it??? and can you let me know how the dev. is going

HONK HONK HONK - TheGoose

XyZspineZyX
07-18-2003, 07:26 AM
@F1NaZZ1

If 1C:Maddox has made his jobs correct then this kind of postings dont exists.




Gruß

RogerHawk


http://520082849836-0000.bei.t-online.de/JG68_logo/GreenTigersLogoklein.gif (http://520082849836-0000.bei.t-online.de/index.htm)


<hr>
"Die großen L¶cher in den Fl¤chen sind nicht das Problem. Erst wenn die Dinger fehlen wird mir bei der Sache mulmig."

<hr>

http://www.JG68.de.vu

XyZspineZyX
07-18-2003, 10:33 AM
thegoose001 wrote:
- Xanty that Cr.42 looks F******
- BEAUTIFUL!!!!!!!!!!!!! are you modeling it??? and
- can you let me know how the dev. is going
-
- HONK HONK HONK - TheGoose

Yes, the Fiat Cr.42 is made (external) and it's cockpit on the works. Look in www.il2center.com/Forums (http://www.il2center.com/Forums) and some posts on these forums (use search). Maybe it will be included in a friday update (if any)

Preview
<img src=http://www.silence.plus.com/xanty/il2center/falco/c11.jpg>



<img src=http://www.silence.plus.com/xanty/stuff/fb_falco.jpg>