PDA

View Full Version : # of players............



Real720
03-25-2006, 07:49 PM

darkstealth233
03-26-2006, 05:28 AM
I think 16 is enough. This is Rainbow, not Battlefield 2.

Odinious
03-26-2006, 08:04 AM
I think 16 is enough. This is Rainbow, not Battlefield 2.

Absolutely. It is hard enough to get eight people to follow orders, let alone 16, or god forbid, 32. Especially playing on Team Survival mode.

Real720
03-26-2006, 08:18 AM
This game should include at least 24 players, because it can then suppport 6 teams consisting of 4 squadmates each.

darkstealth233
03-26-2006, 03:16 PM
Originally posted by Real720:
This game should include at least 24 players, because it can then suppport 6 teams consisting of 4 squadmates each.

Well then there should be a gametype for that, and in that gametype there should be aloud more than 16 players but not for stuff like team survival.

Real720
03-26-2006, 03:41 PM
Originally posted by darkstealth233:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Real720:
This game should include at least 24 players, because it can then suppport 6 teams consisting of 4 squadmates each.

Well then there should be a gametype for that, and in that gametype there should be aloud more than 16 players but not for stuff like team survival. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Why not?

del130528032037
03-27-2006, 09:08 AM
Yo Real 720! Why the faudulant poll system, buddy? Don't you think that you should have put a No that's not a good idea option in? Ya, manipulate everything to suite your desires.

No that's not a good idea. You already get that in halo. This is a bad idea, and would cause the game to be a run and shoot game.

True fans don't want a run and shoot game. They want a tactics, use of skill and intelligence game which kinda throws you out of the loop. don't it?

chaoswithin666
03-27-2006, 09:16 AM
Originally posted by MightyLordRay:
Yo Real 720! Why the faudulant poll system, buddy? Don't you think that you should have put a No that's not a good idea option in? Ya, manipulate everything to suite your desires.

No that's not a good idea. You already get that in halo. This is a bad idea, and would cause the game to be a run and shoot game.

True fans don't want a run and shoot game. They want a tactics, use of skill and intelligence game which kinda throws you out of the loop. don't it?

The I do not concur....option means no you do not think there should be more than 16 allowed players at one time.

GSG_9_Rage
03-27-2006, 09:20 AM
i added that option to the poll, myself, after he posted that reply http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

del130528032037
03-27-2006, 11:10 AM
(Just a heads up people)
If you see a poll and it's missing an option, don't select the next best option that suites

your opinion. Skip the poll, and contact an admin to clear that problem up.

Real720
03-27-2006, 02:38 PM
Originally posted by MightyLordRay:
Yo Real 720! Why the faudulant poll system, buddy? Don't you think that you should have put a No that's not a good idea option in? Ya, manipulate everything to suite your desires.

No that's not a good idea. You already get that in halo. This is a bad idea, and would cause the game to be a run and shoot game.

True fans don't want a run and shoot game. They want a tactics, use of skill and intelligence game which kinda throws you out of the loop. don't it?

I wasn't manipulating the thread you idiot! Think about it, why the f*** would I include ONLY 2 polls!? What I meant to say for the other poll was that some people don't care about having 24 players! Use your brain!!! 1 answer HAS to be the contradiction! And also, how the **** does having 24 players have ANYTHING to do with tactics!?!?

And for the record, I hate halo! It's unrealistic and has so many cheap......stuff....

Edit: Since when did halo have 24 players?

del130528032037
03-28-2006, 07:37 AM
What I meant by that was in Halo you can have more than sixteen players. Oh, and what else do you call what you did to your poll system?

How can you say all of that when you were plainly trying to manipulate us. Don't be so nieve. You know? If you didn't call me an

idiot, and get all mad all the time, you wouldn't look like an idiot yourself. Post another boisterous reply, and I'm going to report you.

Real720
03-28-2006, 02:26 PM
Let me get this straight. I thought that the second choice was good enough, but I do admit that I should've included the poll, not concur. I didn't want to manipulate the thread in any way. Besides, the other users can write out something other than, not concur.

P.S. Sorry for calling you an idiot, Ray.

del130528032037
03-28-2006, 02:38 PM
It's alright man. Your not the only one that calls me an idiot. It just so happens that rednecks get looked down upon quite a bit. lol