PDA

View Full Version : Bf-110G-2 vs C-4 or F-1



okb001
10-25-2007, 05:12 PM
Hello,

Since the C-4 variant is not player flyable (http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-wink.gif), I'm wondering if flying a G-2 at the start of Barbarossa (in place of the C-4 or F-1) will be that sacrilegious and unfair to the AI pilots? According to Wikipedia, the G series is an improved version of the F series which seems to have been pushed in service in June 1941.

Thanks in advance for any comments.

Cheers,

okb001
10-25-2007, 05:12 PM
Hello,

Since the C-4 variant is not player flyable (http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/16x16_smiley-wink.gif), I'm wondering if flying a G-2 at the start of Barbarossa (in place of the C-4 or F-1) will be that sacrilegious and unfair to the AI pilots? According to Wikipedia, the G series is an improved version of the F series which seems to have been pushed in service in June 1941.

Thanks in advance for any comments.

Cheers,

Divine-Wind
10-25-2007, 05:26 PM
The AI pilots can't black out, can't feel air resistance, are immune to overheats, and can see you through the clouds with their thermal sights.


Go for the G-2!

okb001
10-25-2007, 06:09 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Divine-Wind:
The AI pilots can't black out, can't feel air resistance, are immune to overheats, and can see you through the clouds with their thermal sights.

Go for the G-2! </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/88.gif

Kernow
10-26-2007, 09:13 AM
Yea go for it and give the AI a good kicking. It'll still be a bit of a challenge, but Barbarossa should give your 110 a chance to do well, which doesn't happen too often.

I've flown a few missions in the 110 in a Crimea 42 campaign. Bombers and Il-2s can quickly be downed, it's a decent ground-attack platform and, if you stick together for mutual support, you can just about hold your own against any enemy single-seaters.

Kurfurst__
10-26-2007, 09:19 AM
The 110G series did not enter production until December 1942.. it`s basically an 1943 bird so a bit anachronistic for 1941.

That being said, I don`t think the overall performance would be much different between the 110F and G models, so in the end, it`s kinda fair.

okb001
10-26-2007, 09:31 AM
It's definitely a bit of a stretch, but in the hands of a bad pilot like myself it won't be too unfair to the AIs http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

I did try the C-4 model (http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/blush.gif) and found it to be somewhat less stiff and quicker to respond than the G-2 ... that sort of surprised me, since I was expecting the reverse. Was I wrong?

general_kalle
10-26-2007, 12:25 PM
me110-C4 not flyable?... http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

JG53Frankyboy
10-26-2007, 12:38 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by okb001:
It's definitely a bit of a stretch, but in the hands of a bad pilot like myself it won't be too unfair to the AIs http://forums.ubi.com/groupee_common/emoticons/icon_wink.gif

I did try the C-4 model (http://forums.ubi.com/images/smilies/blush.gif) and found it to be somewhat less stiff and quicker to respond than the G-2 ... that sort of surprised me, since I was expecting the reverse. Was I wrong? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

it was like in the 109series.
the early ones were better to fly.
the later ones had better combat ability.

okb001
10-26-2007, 01:33 PM
That's a good point JG53Frankyboy, thanks.