PDA

View Full Version : opinions please...bf-109f-2



XyZspineZyX
10-12-2003, 06:42 PM
I have been playing a few offline campaigns...I am not flying online anymore until the bf-109s get fixed...Do you think its model is accurate? I have read it was the most maneuverable 109 and I find I can fight better with the emil or gustav. Im not talking armament but flight performance.

thanks

http://www.cbrnp.com/profiles/insignia/italy/incocca-tende-scaglia.jpg
Saluti!
<center>http://www.bloggerheads.com/mash_quiz/images/mash_henry_blake.jpg (http://www.bloggerheads.com/mash_quiz/)</center>

XyZspineZyX
10-12-2003, 06:42 PM
I have been playing a few offline campaigns...I am not flying online anymore until the bf-109s get fixed...Do you think its model is accurate? I have read it was the most maneuverable 109 and I find I can fight better with the emil or gustav. Im not talking armament but flight performance.

thanks

http://www.cbrnp.com/profiles/insignia/italy/incocca-tende-scaglia.jpg
Saluti!
<center>http://www.bloggerheads.com/mash_quiz/images/mash_henry_blake.jpg (http://www.bloggerheads.com/mash_quiz/)</center>

XyZspineZyX
10-12-2003, 06:51 PM
Yup. I think the F-models elevators are liitle bit too weak compared to G2 or Es. It may be that the G2 turn rate is somewhat overmodelled. Dunno about Emils.

http://www.comicsutra.com/cs/tv2000/son_of_beach/notch.jpg



"Ride the Big One"
- Notch Johnson

XyZspineZyX
10-12-2003, 06:54 PM
hi,

On the contrary I like them alot!But it,s the same with taste. Everybody has a slightly other.Not to forget your kilss,I fly it every day for 2 years now.It,s paying off.But a lot of hard work.I agree with the armament.It,s poor, but it was like that! Good luck!

XyZspineZyX
10-12-2003, 07:28 PM
I have always read that some LW aces prefered the F models over the Gs becuase it curn turn better, but the guns were weaker.

I sense the reverse in FB, I feel that the F model doesnt handle as well as the early Gs, but thats just my opinion

<center>http://www.blitzpigs.com/john/BP-johann-9-4-03.gif <center>

Buzz_25th
10-12-2003, 08:01 PM
Tha F2 is a little weak in armament. The F4 is a sweetheart though.

As for being accurate. It's hard to tell anymore what accurate is. Let's wait for the next patch to see how it plays out. I'm always hopeful that all planes will be accurate someday.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
25th_Buzz
<center>
http://www.elknet.pl/acestory/foto1/drew2.jpg

XyZspineZyX
10-12-2003, 08:29 PM
mike_espo wrote:
- I have been playing a few offline campaigns...I am
- not flying online anymore until the bf-109s get
- fixed...Do you think its model is accurate? I have
- read it was the most maneuverable 109 and I find I
- can fight better with the emil or gustav. Im not
- talking armament but flight performance.
-
- thanks
-

The F2 climbs better, is faster, and, I think, as maneuverable as the E.

Compared with the G2, on the other hand, I think it lacks power, and the Gustav has better guns.

On the whole, I would chose the G2 over the F2, even if you can get more fun with the latter if you fly it as a sport plane.

But the F is clearly superior to the E, and, as a dogfighter, I don't think the G6 is as good as the Franz, except for armament.

Rew_
10-12-2003, 09:48 PM
I believe the F series can be an incredibly manuverable aircraft and is the most agile of the 109s. They are also the weakest in terms of firepower though. The G versions are where the 109 starts getting heavier and the big firepower and engines are introduced.