PDA

View Full Version : Oleg please were are the new Flyable bombers?



XyZspineZyX
11-10-2003, 11:19 PM
S! Oleg.

Forgive me for asking ?
Buht were are the new flyable bombers , Night-fighters , Recon , Waterplane`s and ahter type of aircrafts ?
We do get so many new flyable fighters in this game and yet we still have only a He-111 , Ju-87 , TB3 and IL2 serie as bombers/Ground-atack for this great game.
The eastern front is not ready yet if this is a sim from 1941 till the end of the war.
Is it not time to give us players that love to fly ahter type of aircrafts than a Fighter.
Please dont forget us Bomber/multi-engine aircrafts lover.
So please help us and stop the fighters for a moment to give us a flyable bomber , recon , waterplane and transport.
Thank u sir.

Greatings I/KG26_Oranje.

XyZspineZyX
11-10-2003, 11:19 PM
S! Oleg.

Forgive me for asking ?
Buht were are the new flyable bombers , Night-fighters , Recon , Waterplane`s and ahter type of aircrafts ?
We do get so many new flyable fighters in this game and yet we still have only a He-111 , Ju-87 , TB3 and IL2 serie as bombers/Ground-atack for this great game.
The eastern front is not ready yet if this is a sim from 1941 till the end of the war.
Is it not time to give us players that love to fly ahter type of aircrafts than a Fighter.
Please dont forget us Bomber/multi-engine aircrafts lover.
So please help us and stop the fighters for a moment to give us a flyable bomber , recon , waterplane and transport.
Thank u sir.

Greatings I/KG26_Oranje.

XyZspineZyX
11-11-2003, 07:43 AM
couldn't agree more... I did hear the SM. 79 Spaviero will make it in, it's a start.

bump

XyZspineZyX
11-12-2003, 12:45 AM
Lots of new planes in the Addon coming in January.

Multi-engined stuff too...good possibility for stuff like the A-20, Ju-88, Beaufighter, the Whirlwind(?), etc.

http://home.cogeco.ca/~cczerneda/sigs/temp_sig.jpg
"Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few." - Winston Churchill

XyZspineZyX
11-12-2003, 12:54 AM
jan feb mar who knows

<center>http://www.geocities.com/leadspittersig/LS1.txt
Good dogfighters bring ammo home, Great ones don't. (c) Leadspitter
<a HREF="http://www.il2skins.com/?action=list&authoridfilter=:Leadspitter:&comefrom=top5&ts=1068087655"> LeadSpitters Skins
</center>

XyZspineZyX
11-12-2003, 01:10 AM
April, May ...

http://www.endlager.net/fis/pix/banners/fis_banner_09.gif

XyZspineZyX
11-12-2003, 02:58 AM
I couldn't agree more with you. Though even multi-engined fighters will be good too.
I would prefer a german bomber like the Ju-88, Do-17, or a Bf-110, but I've to admit that a "proper" bomber or multi-engined fighter for the russians would be great too (DB-3 or Pe-2?)
-Knokke

XyZspineZyX
11-12-2003, 12:54 PM
Thnx for u support,

i hope it notice Oleg that there is some intrest in ahter aircrafts to and not only Fighters.
dont get me rong buht IL2 is starting to be more and more to be a big Dogficht game were there is not manny room for bombers etz etz (only as target lol )
Some players like to do it wiht big bombs on alt , or need a spare engine. lol.
So dont forget that groop of players hehehehehe.

greatings and thnx for the support.
I/KG26_Oranje

XyZspineZyX
11-12-2003, 01:03 PM
I support you too. I need my destroyers /i/smilies/16x16_smiley-sad.gif Bf110 and Ju88C6 /i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif

2 things we need in FB:
The 110 and the desert!!!
http://exn.ca/news/images/1999/04/23/19990423-Me110coloursideMAIN.jpg

XyZspineZyX
11-12-2003, 02:23 PM
Big bump /i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif

Top of the list, before anything else, the Me-110 and the Pe-2.

Then the Ju-88 and any other single engined types. Would be nice to get some of the 88 variants which weren't 'normal' bombers (eg night-fighter & ground-attack versions), but that would be a bonus.

Must be plenty of sources for the C-47 cockpit... great if that could be made flyable... /i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif

Kernow
249 IAP

XyZspineZyX
11-13-2003, 08:03 AM
Probably to many AI changes need to be made yet to make it all viable. No point in getting to many bombers in there if the sim isn't ready for them. Some specialized attack routines are and defensive formations are sorely needed.

XyZspineZyX
11-13-2003, 08:35 AM
you are absolutly right !

spezialy ju88 series /i/smilies/16x16_smiley-tongue.gif
cant wait for that baby to drop the big bombs (if they realy come)

call me junkers whyner /i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif

but they are the best aircraft for me!

mfg/greetings
Wikinger, Kampfgeschwader 76
N√¬§hern uns dem Ziel, noch etwa 5 Minuten !

http://kg76.clanzone.at/pics/banner/banner_klein.gif (http://kg76.clanzone.at/)


http://www.buddy-spike.com/bs-com.jpg (http://www.buddy-spike.com)

XyZspineZyX
11-15-2003, 02:37 AM
yeh rgr that i love to see the Ju88 flyable to in all its forms.
Waht is a online airforce wihtout flyable bombers?
correct only propshooters hehehehehe.

http://www.edelphic.com/Cappyland/Cappyland/images/kg26%20shield.jpg

S! I/KG26_Oranje

Mad_Hatter009
11-15-2003, 01:47 PM
I agree,

Flying a deep mission in a big bomber would be alot of fun. But Redman does make a good point. What good is a flight of B-17s if they can't fly the box. No mission is worth losing half your group. Well, good things come to those who wait - on both points.

Bump.

"Wars are not won by killing the enemy one at a time at 20,000 feet. They are won by killing them by the dozens on the ground." -Unknown Attack Pilot

XyZspineZyX
11-15-2003, 02:35 PM
The more Bombers we get the better !

Our bombersquad is already bored !

We need the JU88, the PE2 for the reds and of course maybe the B-25


DON't FOrget the 110 !!

http://www.hell-hounds.de/sigs/gotcha.jpg

XyZspineZyX
11-20-2003, 08:43 PM
Yep same here , we are bored to.
Please oleg forget the fighters for a moment and give us bombers etc etc.
Waht is the Normandie map and ahter maps good for than , only dogfihts?
Or early war coops?
A game is not compleed wihtout all its instruments.

This is a great sim if u love to fly in fighters , buht for the ahter players?
Its poor.
Dont let us down oleg u have a great basic wiht il2.

I/KG26_Oranje

XyZspineZyX
11-20-2003, 09:53 PM
We'll be flying the B-25's with in the 380th BG. /i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif
cant wait for the A-20, B-24 /i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif

<CENTER>
http://invisionfree.com:54/40/30/upload/p1022.jpg

<FONT COLOR="White">Ghost Skies Matches Starting soon!
<CENTER><FONT COLOR="blue">
Please visit the 310th FS & 380th BG Online @:
<CENTER><FONT COLOR="orange" http://members.tripod.com/tophatssquadron/
<CENTER><FONT COLOR="RED">
A proud member Squadron of Ghost Skies Forgotten Battles Tournament League.
<CENTER><FONT COLOR="orange"> 310th VF/BS Public forum:
<CENTER><FONT COLOR="YELLOW"> http://invisionfree.com/forums/310th_VFBG/
<CENTER><CENTER><FONT COLOR="YELLOW"> Get my USAAF 8th AF Squadron Insignia Files @ IL-2Skins ('http://www.il2skins.com/?action=display&skinid=4206')
<FONT COLOR="purple">Slainte Mhath- Good Health to you!

XyZspineZyX
11-20-2003, 10:01 PM
Agree here also. I'm a fan of single and multi engine tactical ground attack aircraft. Low level ground attack missions are my favorite.

Mtn.

XyZspineZyX
11-20-2003, 11:23 PM
every f/s has fighters..but most step away when it comes to bombers, bring em on, I love the heavy's

And FFS someone put the PE-2 in the game, why this was left out is still a head scracher.

"Culpam Poena Premit Comes"

"Culpam Poena Premit Comes"

XyZspineZyX
11-21-2003, 12:11 AM
LANCASTER

I heard it was the only aircraft which put the Bomb in Bomber.........

XyZspineZyX
11-21-2003, 02:26 PM
The B-29 Flying Fortress, any word on when we may be able to fly it. Another nice touch would be the capability to load the "Fat Man" and "Little Boy". This may not go over well in online play, but great fun for creating different historical scenarios in Europe.



The United States Air Force....
When you absolutely, positively, have to have it blown up over night.

492FS 48th FW Lakenheath England
http://www.raflakenheath.homestead.com/files/F_15TaxingTakeoff.jpg

XyZspineZyX
11-21-2003, 03:13 PM
lanc needed tbh/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif


whineingu /i/smilies/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif /i/smilies/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif /i/smilies/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif

XyZspineZyX
11-21-2003, 04:35 PM
Ju-88 and Pe-2/3 and Tu-2 are a must to complete the Eastern Front portion of this game!

You smug-faced crowds with kindling eye
Who cheer when soldier lads march by,
Sneak home and pray you'll never know
The hell where youth and laughter go.
-Sigfreid Sassoon- Suicide in the Trenches

XyZspineZyX
11-21-2003, 04:45 PM
The reason for not having more bombers is that they are simply many times more difficult to make compared to fighters.


Their cockpit models can be five to six times more complex than fighter models. They often have specialised radio and bombing systems that require much more research than average fighter with only radio for speaking and reflector or iron sight for aiming weapons.


Maddox Games are hard pressed already and more flyable bombers MUST come from 3rd party contributors. So stop asking for freebies and start helping modellers of planes like Lancaster and A-20. Or if you can model very well, contact Oleg and ask for references for a bomber like Pe-2 which is not being worked at the moment.



-jippo

XyZspineZyX
11-21-2003, 04:48 PM
Do you think I did sit and made it for a week?

Multicrew planes take much more time in development. We have not it and can't make only new planes and more bombers. We give it to third party.

I don't promice in January add-on more multicrew bombers, except that is planned and usd from already ready cocmpits for TB-3.

But we make ourselves flyable B-25. But that may take a time more than we we have before the release of January ecpansion pack.

Same with third party models. A-20, Ju-88, etc... They are still far from complition of the work in 3D.

Oleg Maddox
1C:Maddox Games

XyZspineZyX
11-21-2003, 04:55 PM
Thanks for your reply Oleg.

You smug-faced crowds with kindling eye
Who cheer when soldier lads march by,
Sneak home and pray you'll never know
The hell where youth and laughter go.
-Sigfreid Sassoon- Suicide in the Trenches


You smug-faced crowds with kindling eye
Who cheer when soldier lads march by,
Sneak home and pray you'll never know
The hell where youth and laughter go.
-Sigfreid Sassoon- Suicide in the Trenches


You smug-faced crowds with kindling eye
Who cheer when soldier lads march by,
Sneak home and pray you'll never know
The hell where youth and laughter go.
-Sigfreid Sassoon- Suicide in the Trenches

XyZspineZyX
11-21-2003, 05:19 PM
Thnx oleg for the responce.

i know it ask for a lot of time to bild and make it flyable,
a bomber is simple more complex to bild.
And i start this posting to motivate the 3e party bilders for more flyable bombers/trans/water aircrafts.
And i was hoping u , Oleg give a direction to the 3e party bilders to bild tham and not only fighters.
For exemple , i remaimber that the B-25 bomber was started in the day`s before IL2/FB was out.
I have seen the first screen shots in april 2002 wiht the he177 and many more bombers transport etc etc.
i know its hard to get it correct buht i have the feeling that the forget thats there is a lot of multi engine fans waiting for tham.
More than u reed in the forums , and still waiting for tham.
In my groop of friends there is for 80% bomber fans and play online only wiht bombers buht we lost the motivation to play becose we dont have many option to play wiht.
Buht i got ure ation for this matter and thats very importend.
I hope u do somthing wiht it and dont forget it.
We love u Oleg and hope u stay working on the great sims u produce and make il2 compleet wiht more multiengine aircrafts.
IL2 is not ready yet.

Thnx Oleg
I/KG26_Oranje

ZG77_Nagual
11-21-2003, 05:33 PM
The He111 is allready way more than amazing!

S!

http://pws.chartermi.net/~cmorey/pics/whiner.jpg

XyZspineZyX
11-21-2003, 07:18 PM
I totally agree, I would like planes like Pe2, IL10 or Ju88, but the problem is that people wants to fly fighters and there is not commercial interest in developing heavy bombers. May be 3rnd party...

Humans rarely live long enough to see the consequences of their mistakes

XyZspineZyX
11-21-2003, 08:03 PM
Oleg_Maddox wrote:
- Do you think I did sit and made it for a week?
-
- Multicrew planes take much more time in development.
- We have not it and can't make only new planes and
- more bombers. We give it to third party.
-
- I don't promice in January add-on more multicrew
- bombers, except that is planned and usd from already
- ready cocmpits for TB-3.
-
- But we make ourselves flyable B-25. But that may
- take a time more than we we have before the release
- of January ecpansion pack.
-
- Same with third party models. A-20, Ju-88, etc...
- They are still far from complition of the work in
- 3D.
-
- Oleg Maddox
- 1C:Maddox Games
-


Maddox Games is making the B-25 flyable?! That's incredible news! Thank you sir.

Really couldn't ask for anything more than a flyable Ju-88 and B-25. Perfect for the FB enviroment.


--AKD

http://www.flyingpug.com/pugline2.jpg

XyZspineZyX
11-21-2003, 09:50 PM
I so hope that they have time to compleate the B-25. /i/smilies/16x16_smiley-indifferent.gif
Just won't seem right to have us squadron flying around the pacific map bombeing japanese instalations in German Junkpiles.

Thanks for the B-25's oleg. your our hero. /i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.gif


<CENTER>
http://invisionfree.com:54/40/30/upload/p1022.jpg

<FONT COLOR="White">Ghost Skies Matches Starting soon!
<CENTER><FONT COLOR="blue">
Please visit the 310th FS & 380th BG Online @:
<CENTER><FONT COLOR="orange" http://members.tripod.com/tophatssquadron/
<CENTER><FONT COLOR="RED">
A proud member Squadron of Ghost Skies Forgotten Battles Tournament League.
<CENTER><FONT COLOR="orange"> 310th VF/BS Public forum:
<CENTER><FONT COLOR="YELLOW"> http://invisionfree.com/forums/310th_VFBG/
<CENTER><CENTER><FONT COLOR="YELLOW"> Get my USAAF 8th AF Squadron Insignia Files @ IL-2Skins ('http://www.il2skins.com/?action=display&skinid=4206')
<FONT COLOR="purple">Slainte Mhath- Good Health to you!

XyZspineZyX
11-22-2003, 11:08 AM
IL-10 ?

please ?