PDA

View Full Version : Duds - The Poll



Yellonet
06-27-2004, 07:01 AM

Yellonet
06-27-2004, 07:01 AM

Bobsqueek
06-27-2004, 08:36 AM
Duds could be part of "realistic gunnery" option in the difficulty section

CWoS FB forum. More Cheese, Less Whine. (http://www.acompletewasteofspace.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=25)

Yellonet
06-27-2004, 11:07 AM
Bump!


- Yellonet

Latico
06-27-2004, 06:23 PM
MK13 torps would have to be modeled so that they would "dud" early in the war. AFter the bugs were worked out they were pretty reliable.

And US subs used the MK13 too. I read that it was the Sub guys that fixed most of the problems, even though the order ahd gone out not to tinker with them.

Insubordination can be a good thing sometimes. http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

Baco-ECV56
06-28-2004, 05:00 PM
Onlly DudÔ┬┤s should be a low percentage And a mesaage should pop when a Torpedo impacted but was a Dud...

icrash
06-28-2004, 08:56 PM
I want milk duds http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/16x16_smiley-very-happy.gif Seriously though, should go under realistic gunnery. The Avengers are gonna catch enough grief as it is.

http://img38.photobucket.com/albums/v117/icrash/txraidersig.bmp

ElAurens
06-29-2004, 05:35 AM
I'd rather se the time spent to implement this go to say, not having every P51 loose it's wings in high G maneuvers. They all did not, unlike the current Axis biased implementation in 2.01.

_____________________________

http://www.blitzpigs.com/forum/images/avatars/Curtiss_logo.gif

BlitzPig_EL

t0n.
06-29-2004, 03:22 PM
If reliability is going to be modelled, then it should be modelled across the board shouldn't it?

I'd be okay with that, as the reliability and servicability issues that plagued the IJN/IJAF played a critical role in the outcome of the conflict.

http://img78.photobucket.com/albums/v292/t0n2004/t0ns0108.jpg

icrash
06-29-2004, 07:14 PM
[QUOTE]Originally posted by t0n.:
If reliability is going to be modelled, then it should be modelled across the board shouldn't it?

I'd be okay with that, as the reliability and servicability issues that plagued the IJN/IJAF played a critical role in the outcome of the conflict.[QUOTE]

I think it should be across the board. Neither side should be singled out for equipment problems. The Japanese had probs with their torps I'm sure so that should be figured in too (even if failure rate wasn't as high). I guess the options would be: (1) Only US torps have issues that gradually diminish through out the war. In this case let the whiners start because the Japanese don't have issues that did effect equipment but the U.S. does. (2) Everybody gets equipment problems to whatever degree they existed so thing even out more or less. Modeling this could get ugly I'm sure. (3) Put the "duds" in realistic gunnery and only those who want realistic guns but not the duds whine. (4) Set up dud torps with an on/off like the other settings. Just my opinion, pardon all ramblings.
http://img38.photobucket.com/albums/v117/icrash/txraidersig.bmp

[This message was edited by icrash on Tue June 29 2004 at 06:28 PM.]