PDA

View Full Version : How do you expect the new "adjusted" .50 cal Brownings to perform?



04-12-2004, 07:43 PM

04-12-2004, 07:43 PM

SeaFireLIV
04-12-2004, 07:47 PM
I will cry if they kill Tiger tanks. No doubt the whines will probably continue. I just hope it will be `realistic` whatever that may be.

SeaFireLIV...

http://img12.photobucket.com/albums/v31/SeaFireLIV/spitfpetite.jpg

noshens
04-12-2004, 07:47 PM
How about they are not going to be fixed option?

04-12-2004, 08:03 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by SeaFireLIV:
I will cry if they kill Tiger tanks. No doubt the whines will probably continue. I just hope it will be `realistic` whatever that may be.

SeaFireLIV...

http://img12.photobucket.com/albums/v31/SeaFireLIV/spitfpetite.jpg
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

The Tiger Tank option is just for fun... it's a reference to an old flaming thread from long ago.

Maple_Tiger
04-12-2004, 08:09 PM
I voted that they will kill king tiger tanks, obviously. http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/blink.gif

Im only kidding lol.

http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/35.gif



Capt. 361stMapleTiger.
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid111/p4a4fe01f1585e87d078204671c682c4d/f90e96f0.jpg
Proud member of the FBAA and Nutty Philosohpy Club.

VW-IceFire
04-12-2004, 08:16 PM
Less dispersion...nobody wants a super gun...just as accurate as possible. Since its a primary weapon on so many aircraft and a secondary one on many more its probably good to have this one down.

http://home.cogeco.ca/~cczerneda/sigs/tmv-sig1.jpg
RCAF 412 Falcon Squadron - "Swift to Avenge"

VF-10_Snacky
04-13-2004, 01:28 AM
I actually would really like to have more visable tracers. I cant see them after about 100m.lol maybe I'm going blind.

"Son of a B**ch! That's gonna leave a mark."

tttiger
04-13-2004, 01:45 AM
What do I expect? I expect the model to be accurate. What else?

Dumb thread.

ttt

"I want the one that kills the best with the least amount of risk to me"

-- Chuck Yeager describing "The Best Airplane."

04-13-2004, 03:38 AM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by tttiger:
What do I expect? I expect the model to be accurate. What else?

Dumb thread.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Don't be a chump by blindly assuming that everything in this sim is accurate. If you really think that, I got a bridge to sell ya.

Besides, you're contradicting your opinion from another thread where you claimed not to care about errors.

This is the 2nd thread where tttiger has shown up with trollish replies. First, in a serious thread, and then this bizarre reply to a clearly humorous thread. Give it a break eh? http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

Bansai Potato
04-13-2004, 04:08 AM
Who needs .50 cals when i've got one squirt of 20mm and a whole 9 yards of .303 in my Spitfire http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif

Mind you the dispersion could be toned down a bit i suppose for when i'm takeing the P40 for a jolly

http://homepage.hispeed.ch/Ede_EAF92/EAF/24890632.92EastIndiaSquadronpersonnel.jpg

Snyde-Dastardly
04-13-2004, 06:34 AM
.303,,,yawn. A freakin BB gun compared to a .50. Give me 8 50s,extra ammo,plenty of speed, and a gal who will get me home!

From this day to the end of the world, we in it shall be remembered, we band of brothers http://img21.photobucket.com/albums/v62/Vic-Whiplash/GRDN.bmp

BS87
04-13-2004, 04:35 PM
I hope that the dispersion will be toned down so its not like a shotgun, but i also hope they dont not become unrealisticly laser-like.

Arm_slinger
04-13-2004, 04:43 PM
Make them accurate in terms of flight travel, aproppriate dispersion etc

Also the hitting power? They seem a little underpowered given a very quick burst could tear an aircraft to bits

242Sqn_Kye-
Pilot of 242 Squadron

Sim lover?, want something new? Then look at "Target for Tonight the definitive night bombing simulation ever, featuring the RAF's Bomber Command.

www.nightbomber.com/forums (http://www.nightbomber.com/forums)
Also the home of 242 Squadron "Baders Bastards"

lbhskier37
04-13-2004, 04:47 PM
well if they get reduced dispersion I think they might need a little less power, cause right now they are crazy deadly, I almost feel like I am cheating when I use them

http://lbhskier37.freeservers.com/pics/Killasig3.jpg (http://www.il2skins.com/?action=list&whereauthorid=lbhkilla&comefrom=display&ts=1049772896)
Official "uber190n00b"
"Only the spirit of attack, born in a brave heart, will bring success to any fighter aircraft, no matter how highly developed it may be." Adolf Galland

Weather_Man
04-13-2004, 05:10 PM
I'm guessing they'll be about the same.

TooCooL34
04-13-2004, 06:09 PM
What will be next after Tiger tank? Carrier? http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/images/smiley/53.gif

-----------------

=815=TooCooL34,=815=Squadron

-= 8 1 5 =- FB Dedi Server is coming soon. (with AEP Dedicated Server)
100Mb IDC line, P4 2.8G server.
Full real but limited icon, minimap path and spdbar.
You can expect something, since I run the server myself. http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif

GK.
04-13-2004, 06:14 PM
i pop bf engines with 1 trigger pull of 4 fifties. they arent that bad. i just wish the american planes had more ammo

TAGERT.
04-13-2004, 06:27 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by cosmokart:
So here's a little poll just for fun.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>I expect that they will be different than what they are currently.

http://www.geocities.com/grantsenn/kickme.jpg
TAGERT

BS87
04-13-2004, 08:36 PM
i suspect that no matter how they change, people will whine about them http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/infopop/emoticons/icon_razz.gif