Your opinions on the horses in the world of Assassin's Creed | Forums

[Slayer_WTF]

I love it how everyone says in some games "better animation"..

Guys, the Animations of the Horses have been Unchanged since the first Assassins Creed

I played AC1 and Brotherhood, and I can assure you that some things are different. For example, they move more .. fat ***.

[Assassin_M]

I played AC1 and Brotherhood, and I can assure you that some things are different. For example, they move more .. fat ***.

Its not "different" its just that they added more Animations..
but the ones returning were the same, and guess what ?? I played All Assassins Creeds xD

[Slayer_WTF]

I remember that the animation of the gallop in AC1 was much slower and longer, while AC3 seems normal.

[Assassin_M]

I remember that the animation of the gallop in AC1 was much slower and longer, while AC3 seems normal.

In AC III it looks like Brotherhood`s in some horses, while AC I had the old gallop for all Horses. same with AC II.

[SixKeys]

Not outside of the Leonardo Machine Gun mission it wasn't, that was the ONLY time we could Gallop in ACB, regardless of the platform version. Galloping was not available during free-roam in Rome, on any platform.

There was one other mission where you could gallop, the Romulus lair where you have to chase down the corrupt leader in some freakish "Eyes Wide Shut" underground party.

The horses looked slightly thinner in AC1 compared to AC2 and ACB, but the visual look never bothered me at all. I do think there was one thing that made the horses better in AC1 and that was the fact that the camera didn't automatically align itself to the side when you started galloping. The player should be allowed to decide for themselves where to place the camera while riding the horse.

[SaintPerkele]

Galloping was not available during free-roam in Rome, on any platform.

Not true. If your PC's graphic card was good enough, you were indeed able to gallop whenever you wanted to.

The only thing that really bothered me in ACB compared to the previous games were the horses' tails and manes. They looked so much better in AC1 and 2, no idea what they did to them.

[SixKeys]

Not true. If your PC's graphic card was good enough, you were indeed able to gallop whenever you wanted to.

That is simply not true. A game mechanic has nothing to do with your graphics card. The gallop was replaced with the "stand" and pole flip maneuver except in a couple of specific, linear missions.

[SaintPerkele]

That is simply not true. A game mechanic has nothing to do with your graphics card. The gallop was replaced with the "stand" and pole flip maneuver except in a couple of specific, linear missions.

Sorry, typo, I meant SSD not graphics card.
And it WAS possible, believe me:

[Locopells]

Not outside of the Leonardo Machine Gun mission it wasn't, that was the ONLY time we could Gallop in ACB, regardless of the platform version. Galloping was not available during free-roam in Rome, on any platform.

Also that very last mission when getting from the battlefield to the castle where CB was.

[MetalCreed]

I really love horses, but when I played RDR in 2010, my whole view of horses changed. I wanted horses that moved like they did in Red Dead Redemption.

Also the horses are too huge and the mechanics suck. Also needs more variety in appearance, and maybe also need a stamina bar.

Also why don't we get to ever free roam with wagons?