UBI has failed us, But we still have some hope. | Forums

[Dcopymope]

*inappropriate comments removed*

I don't mean to instigate. But.... LMAO!!!

It is late where I am and apparently I am also delirious. Thanks for making my evening with that one.
Made the water fly out my mouth. Lol. Gotta love the forums man.

*EDIT*
I suggest when you guys are finally done with Ubisoft, cancel your uplay accounts (uplay shows what you have purchased) enmass along with your forum account.
They can track this, thus, the whole action speaks louder than words will probably help your cause.

Otherwise, it's just words in a forum. Gotta use actions fellas.

I've been putting my words into action since Vegas 2, Graw 1 and Double Agent, the last three Tom Clancy games I bought years ago. I haven't even played a Tom Clancy game since, as all the subsequent titles after Graw 1 and Double Agent were absolute turds. I don't buy into any companies crap even though I may be a fan of the games. Just so you get my drift of what I was saying in my previous post about them selling the Tom Clancy brand, I haven't bought a Halo game since Halo 3, because I don't put up with rehashed crap. I'm looking forward to Halo 4 now that Bungie is out of the picture, to see what this new company can do with it. For lots of long time fans, Patriots is Ubi Softs last chance to show us they got their heads screwed back on straight, if not, then most of them will be gone turning this forum into nothing more than a gathering place for stupid people that fall for Ubi Soft's hype.

[Raven Kellie]

I've off the forum for a while.. I see that nothing as changed:
People jumping on fast conclusion as well as no news for the game. And, of course, lack of respect/constructive comments

It is seriously sad. But still I understand the disappointment and lack of feeds can get frustrating. Fans get emotive.
Mods, can't Ubi throws us a bone here?

[sameer_monier]

I've been putting my words into action since Vegas 2, Graw 1 and Double Agent, the last three Tom Clancy games I bought years ago. I haven't even played a Tom Clancy game since, as all the subsequent titles after Graw 1 and Double Agent were absolute turds. I don't buy into any companies crap even though I may be a fan of the games. Just so you get my drift of what I was saying in my previous post about them selling the Tom Clancy brand, I haven't bought a Halo game since Halo 3, because I don't put up with rehashed crap. I'm looking forward to Halo 4 now that Bungie is out of the picture, to see what this new company can do with it.

I respect that.

For lots of long time fans, Patriots is Ubi Softs last chance to show us they got their heads screwed back on straight,

why is this their last chance ?!, you hated Vegas, GRAW & DA, then you got SCC, GRFS which you hated too I guess, how can you expect it to be different this time ?!, not to mention Ubi is still happy with what they are doing.

if not, then most of them will be gone turning this forum into nothing more than a gathering place for stupid people that fall for Ubi Soft's hype.

now that is immature of you, just cause people like GRAW, GRFS, Vegas, DA, and SCC doesn't make them any less hardcore than you or any other fan, and it certainly doesn't make them stupid, alot of fans liked Vegas, I have a friend who is a big R6 fan, and he loved Vegas, does that makes him stupid ?!, nope, does that makes his opinion not important ?!, hell no.

you got to understand, you want just the old school game, while others want a balance between old school and new school, neither of you should force his opinion on the other.

[sonoblink]

I've always had the highest of respect for Ubisoft and there Clancy Dev teams untill late.
When Ubi announced they had changed there minds and were going ahead with GRFS for pc i thought hell yea nice 1 Ubi knowing RB6 was futher away and at least we as a clan could play something new from our Fav gaming series.
Firstly competitive mode "Where is the Clan Tag " You have to hit user stats ? It has always been beside your username
I preordered 2 copys got them and one worked on my pc but the other we had very low frames so i thought ok np i'll build a new pc for my son.
Just making a point i've done everything i can trying to stay committed to this brand and enjoy what should be a great game!
Now over 7 weeks later and the game still does not work properly connection issues the main problem.
What unearth is Ubi playing at,what sort of Dev team is working on this game is there no management system ?
I don't think they can even read,this was suppose to be the patch fix.
The next Title Update will be available on August 13^th and features the following:

• CompatibilitySTILL THERE, performance YES, stability YES, graphics improvementsYES and more - taking your feedback directly into account;
• Improved FPS on all configurations;
• Fixes for several stability issues during map loading;STILL THERE;
• God-Rays no longer disappear STILL THERE;
• Fixed some localization issuesSTILL THERE;
• Fixed some issues causing the display of hint icons from X360 controller when disconnected.STILL THERE; ]

Why is there no release notes well its obvious ^^


Look at least keep the fans up to date with whats going on,we are trying hard to stay with you guys the lest Ubi can do is the same!

[Dcopymope]

why is this their last chance ?!, you hated Vegas, GRAW & DA, then you got SCC, GRFS which you hated too I guess, how can you expect it to be different this time ?!, not to mention Ubi is still happy with what they are doing.

You should know me enough by now that I'm not that foolish to continue buying into their crap. I never said I bought Conviction or Future Soldier. I played the demo to Conviction, but as for Future Soldier, I was going to rent it, but really, I didn't even have to play it to know how disrespectful the game was going to be to the Ghost Recon franchise and I wasn't going to disrespect myself by paying for it in any way. Any honest fan can see how crappy that game was going to be. Graw 1 was pushing it, Future Soldier took the insult to another level.

now that is immature of you, just cause people like GRAW, GRFS, Vegas, DA, and SCC doesn't make them any less hardcore than you or any other fan, and it certainly doesn't make them stupid, alot of fans liked Vegas, I have a friend who is a big R6 fan, and he loved Vegas, does that makes him stupid ?!, nope, does that makes his opinion not important ?!, hell no.

you got to understand, you want just the old school game, while others want a balance between old school and new school, neither of you should force his opinion on the other.

Your right, I'll call them foolish instead of stupid then, if that sounds better for you. A mix of old and "new" school (the correct term being casualization) is what the original lead devs promised, but as we can see they all vacated or were removed, obviously for this very reason. The reason why is simple, because the very policy of Ubi Soft is one dimensional. If Ubi Soft has any say in the developmental of Patriots, then by the time they are done with it, it in all likely hood won't have any resemblance to anything called Rainbow Six. The only fanbase they care for is the Call of Duty/Halo crowd, and it shows in Future Soldier. When it comes to Future Solder, I'm not just talking a mere dumbing down of certain aspects of the gameplay like Vegas and Graw 1, I'm talking a complete b@tchering of the gameplay, a complete removal of literally everything that made Ghost Recon what it used to be. That is the level of disrespect Ubi Soft has for the Tom Clancy brand. It was almost the same with Conviction, don't be surprised if the next Splinter Cell turns out completely unrecognizable as well. You deserve everything you get if you keep paying for it.

[sameer_monier]

You should know me enough by now that I'm not that foolish to continue buying into their crap. I never said I bought Conviction or Future Soldier. I played the demo to Conviction, but as for Future Soldier, I was going to rent it, but really, I didn't even have to play it to know how disrespectful the game was going to be to the Ghost Recon franchise and I wasn't going to disrespect myself by paying for it in any way. Any honest fan can see how crappy that game was going to be. Graw 1 was pushing it, Future Soldier took the insult to another level.

that's my point, why do you think R6P is Ubi's last chance ?!, their new take on Clancy titles doesn't suit your taste, why do you think Patriot will be any different, or that the hardcore fans are waiting for it to leave !!!

Your right, I'll call them foolish instead of stupid then, if that sounds better for you. A mix of old and "new" school (the correct term being casualization) is what the original lead devs promised, but as we can see they all vacated or were removed, obviously for this very reason. The reason why is simple, because the very policy of Ubi Soft is one dimensional. If Ubi Soft has any say in the developmental of Patriots, then by the time they are done with it, it in all likely hood won't have any resemblance to anything called Rainbow Six. The only fanbase they care for is the Call of Duty/Halo crowd, and it shows in Future Soldier. When it comes to Future Solder, I'm not just talking a mere dumbing down of certain aspects of the gameplay like Vegas and Graw 1, I'm talking a complete b@tchering of the gameplay, a complete removal of literally everything that made Ghost Recon what it used to be. That is the level of disrespect I'm talking about. It was almost the same with Conviction, don't be surprised if the next Splinter Cell turns out completely unrecognizable as well. You deserve everything you get if you keep paying for it.

foolish is still as bad, for example I love SC, it is my fav. game, I love CT, but I actually love SCC as well, does that makes me a fool or stupid cause I didn't hate it like the hardcore fans ?!, especially since I know alot of hardcore fans who actually loved SCC as well, we enjoyed it, we know their are flaws, but still enjoyed it, that doesn't make you any smarter than us.

you say what you like about GRFS, SCC, and R6V, but the truth remain that other people still see them as great games, true to their name, different yeah, but still can carry their name, maybe you don't agree, but does that makes your opinion a FACT ?!, not at all, it is just an OPINION, no one forced you to support the changes you don't like, but others like these changes and will support it, they see their fav. game as a good game still, you can't force what you think into them

If you don't like it, fine, don't buy it, and keep pointing what you want in the forum, if you want to give it up all, it is your choice as well, but don't go people who like the change or the new take fool, stupid, or not hardcore, cause that is a delusion man.

[Dcopymope]

foolish is still as bad, for example I love SC, it is my fav. game, I love CT, but I actually love SCC as well, does that makes me a fool or stupid cause I didn't hate it like the hardcore fans ?!, especially since I know alot of hardcore fans who actually loved SCC as well, we enjoyed it, we know their are flaws, but still enjoyed it, that doesn't make you any smarter than us.

you say what you like about GRFS, SCC, and R6V, but the truth remain that other people still see them as great games, true to their name, different yeah, but still can carry their name, maybe you don't agree, but does that makes your opinion a FACT ?!, not at all, it is just an OPINION, no one forced you to support the changes you don't like, but others like these changes and will support it, they see their fav. game as a good game still, you can't force what you think into them.

Actually, yes it does make it a fact, and you just verified it for me. Future Solder, Vegas and Conviction are true to THEIR names, but they are not true to the following names: Ghost Recon, Rainbow Six and Splinter Cell. Had they not used the aforementioned names, I wouldn't have a problem with them, which is my entire point. I wouldn't have had a problem with Brothers in Arms Furious 4 had they just called it Furious 4. You get my drift (not that I really care that you do)?

[sameer_monier]

Actually, yes it does make it a fact, and you just verified it for me. Future Solder, Vegas and Conviction are true to THEIR names, but they are not true to the following names: Ghost Recon, Rainbow Six and Splinter Cell. Had they not used the aforementioned names, I wouldn't have a problem with them, which is my entire point. I wouldn't have had a problem with Brothers in Arms Furious 4 had they just called it Furious 4. You get my drift (not that I really care that you do)?

Actually when I said their names I meant Ghost Recon, Rainbow Six & Splinter Cell.

I don't think you are getting what I am saying, whatever you are saying is your opinion, it will never be a FACT, and with such attitude no wonder Ubi is totally ignoring all your points even if some of them are valid, while the other mature and respectful members are getting more attention than you.

well I don't think I can discuss anything with you, after all you think your opinion is a fact, which it isn't, so whatever man, don't buy the game, do what makes you sleep at night (not that I care if you buy the game or not)

[BLACK732]

Maybe there is some hope in R6P,R6 vegas 2 was my favorite clancy game of all time and as i saw so far,patriots will be in a great condition for those who like the action.
if you ask me,GRFS was good but i never played it.if ubisoft want to make a great game,they need to change their map ideas because almost every game in the planet had the same map types,desert,jungle,favela,small town....ect.
what we need is an urban action,where we can see people screaming,running and all that stuff.
R6 vegas 2 was good because almost every level was urban,right?so if R6P had urban maps like NY or something the game will be great,believe it or not.
GLAD TO SEE YOU MATES.