3rd person view | Forums

[Execrate]

R6V1 and 2 had TP Cover old news lol

[D Skul lUnicron]

But Rainbow had 3rd person in the first game & Rogue Spear, 3rd person was in Rainbow Six right from when it was released, So how did 3rd person ruin Rainbow again?

[Dcopymope]

But Rainbow had 3rd person in the first game & Rogue Spear, 3rd person was in Rainbow Six right from when it was released, So how did 3rd person ruin Rainbow again?

Its irrelevant whether or not the older Rainbow Six games had a third person view because that's not what ruined the experience in the Vegas games, it was the cover system that ruined it that allowed you to magically see around corners without actually looking. This half-assed cover along with the wolverine health system are the two gameplay mechanics that were almost the sole contributors to the complete ruination of the experience.

[D Skul lUnicron]

Its irrelevant whether or not the older Rainbow Six games had a third person view because that's not what ruined the experience in the Vegas games, it was the cover system that ruined it that allowed you to magically see around corners without actually looking. This half-assed cover along with the wolverine health system are the two gameplay mechanics that were almost the sole contributors to the complete ruination of the experience.

But You could do that in rogue spear too, havn't you heard of 3rd person camping???

[Om4zd]

I think leaning and peeking should be in instead of the 3rd person cover. Maybe the cover system from Far Cry 3 could work?

[SCE_Soultear]

I honestly can't understand how people can enjoy first-person games. I enjoy how third-person gives me a greater awareness of my surroundings.

I can understand how. You want to have more area to see, an adjustable FOV is all you need. Or a press button feature so as you are running straight you can view to your left or right. Done.

[SCE_Soultear]

. I imagine this feature would also be extremely well received by the multiplayer crowd (of which I'm not really a part). I hope this feature remains and that it even makes it into the next GR.

So you don't play MP, but you want a shoddy 3D view so you can see your nice costume and have the rest of us suffer that buy these games to play online?

That's awesome, thanks for your feedback. This will go straight to the top devs while the real fanbase idea's get shoveled down the toilet. I remember when Vegas and vegas 2 was shoved together in one forum ( Both PC and console) and after that didn't work, they separated the 2 again and lost over half the posts for Vegas PC. There were some good idea's in there before it was destroyed. I see nothing in Patriot ever made it to the company UBI for feedback.

I just saw a video, to late game will be in 3rd person. Another flop for PC, console players only need a game that lasts an 8 month life cycle then they move on. Ubisofts cash Cow.

I do believe PC and Console are coming to an even playing field here in the next year. UBI development and future investments have to look again at this audience because it's getting big again, with android OS devices entering the market it is endless. PC is big to. They have to get over the piracy excuse and move on and quit making crappy glitch games. I get pissed with this comment (PC Pirates) when I go and buy UBI's last Tom Clancy games especially the last one (Ghost Recon Future soldier) and it's a complete crapola and bad, people tend not to buy them anymore after getting burned a few times by the same company.

I have been around for awhile. The fanbase said no to 3rd person view years ago. So what did they do, make another game 3rd person view.
-No 3rd person,
-dedicated servers with a good Rcon,
-and a map editor.

This has been said over a 1000 times and I can say with a 100% accuracy this will not happen. It will be another cheap port with hardly no support. Heck this is not even a guess anymore it will be fact. Get your flame suits on because once the game is released expect bad behavior once again on the forums because nothing will have made it to the game that the fans have asked for.

This time though it will be well deserved. It's been only a decade that the fans wanted a real Rainbow 6 game.

[doogsy91]

So you don't play MP, but you want a shoddy 3D view so you can see your nice costume and have the rest of us suffer that buy these games to play online?

That's awesome, thanks for your feedback. This will go straight to the top devs while the real fanbase idea's get shoveled down the toilet.

Dear ****head

Yes, I want you to suffer. I want third person so I can see my new tac boots but above all, to piss off proper fans like yourself.

Now quoting myself from the ADS thread:

I too like a cover system (in theory) and the left trigger system. I don't like being locked into cover like in GR but I like being locked into ADS if you know what I mean. It's just a shame that a good cover system has never been done. Conviction's was great for its application but god view in a competitive shooter is just stupid.

When I said I liked third person, I was not referring specifically to Rainbow Six. I like third person games (SC, GR, AC etc). If you read the conversation in context, you'll find we were talking about a variety of games.

Now, as evidenced by the above quote, my position is that the Vegas system was flawed due to its god view which was what made the system particularly detrimental to the adversarial component. In my opinion, a third person cover system could work well, I've just not seen it done before.

Happy?

[SCE_Soultear]

Dear ****head

Yes, I want you to suffer. I want third person so I can see my new tac boots but above all, to piss off proper fans like yourself.

Now quoting myself from the ADS thread:

When I said I liked third person, I was not referring specifically to Rainbow Six. I like third person games (SC, GR, AC etc). If you read the conversation in context, you'll find we were talking about a variety of games.

Now, as evidenced by the above quote, my position is that the Vegas system was flawed due to its god view which was what made the system particularly detrimental to the adversarial component. In my opinion, a third person cover system could work well, I've just not seen it done before.

Happy?

Listen hear **** lover, I have been waiting for 10 years for a true R6 game. And no, 3rd person view doesn't work well in online TC games. To many glitches comes with it. Its not even a true 3rd person view, it's more of a gears of war type of view/ cover. Cover works well in Splinter Cell but not Ghost Recon or Rainbow 6.

[doogsy91]

Listen hear **** lover,

Ouch...

I have been waiting for 10 years for a true R6 game.

Entitled much?? I don't give a **** how long you've been playing Rainbow for, my opinion is just as valid as yours. Get the **** off your high horse and stop insulting peoples' intelligence simply for having an opinion that differs from your own.

And no, 3rd person view doesn't work well in online TC games.

...Exactly what I was saying before.

Cover works well in Splinter Cell but not Ghost Recon or Rainbow 6.

And that's your opinion... That's fine.