Yep. As much as I loved AC2, it did a poor job representing the assassins as a guild. I mean, there are loads of assassins, but Ezio is the only one wearing robes and actually doing something, which I found quite odd.
Besides AC1 of course, ACR did the best job when it comes to giving the feeling that the assassins are an active guild. I loved the missions where you could see some random assassins fighting guards while you do the stuff you have to do. However, I have to be honest, I don't really need that for ACIII. Storywise, it would make a lot of sense that there is not yet a huge active guild in North America.
"One of the best villians in games"
I was wondering if that villian belongs to the XVIII century part of the story, or the modern one......
Last edited by tarrero; 08-12-2012 at 02:39 AM.
I'm assuming it's going to be Connor's enemy, since he said the villain in question hasn't been revealed yet, and it's a little late to be introducing a new villain for Desmond. They wouldn't have much time to develop the character, considering how short Desmond's portion will be in comparison to the historical parts.
I have to disagree. The game has a different feel to it than it's predecessors but the likable formula is missing here, if the soundrack near the end was the Main Theme to the game, that is. That should be more like a chase theme. I hope the Main Theme is something as emotional as ACRs Main Theme. CAN'T WAIT!
I think it's the leader of the Mohawks at the time: Johannes Tekarihoga. It would be a huge twist, his fight against the colonists could be something the Templars exploit to get them to join there cause, and this particularly interesting quote "During this war, Johannes Tekarihoga was the leader of the Mohawks. Johannes Tekarihoga died about 1780" I at least think this would be better because if there's a main villain, I want to kill him, and none of the Founding Fathers died before 1783. Charles Lee did die in 1782 so maybe...
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohawk_...olutionary_War