Assassin's Creed II | Forums

[ShaneO7K]

I think it was on twitter, I think? and it makes sense. Since the British was a big world wide empire. But just display both in a neutral perspective, and have Connor neutral.

Until you can give proof of what your saying do not state it as fact. As far as I can see this is all I could find on this particular matter-

The series' "fiction stewards" apparently felt the game had strayed too far from its original focus on the secret war between the Assassins and Templars. It won't be as simple as Assassins/Americans versus Templars/Brits—you'll be taking out people on both sides of the war—and there'll be more discussions between the two sides.

http://www.complex.com/video-games/2...dless-villains

[Assassin_M]

Same here. There are Templars on both sides who would like the Assassin's killed.
Well, the AC Wiki dis-agrees, and this is a sources reference:
During the early 16th century, after the Templars were driven from Italy by the Assassins, the members of the Templar Order were able to seize control of the remnants of the Byzantine Empire. Now in command, the Templars set up their primary headquarters at Cappadocia. The Byzantines' ultimate aim was to uproot the Ottoman Empire and take control of Constantinople. For a time, however, they remained relatively quiet.[1]

Here, read, ''Seize control of the REMNANTS''

The Wiki is not an Official source, I like to go with in game dialogue and database made by "OFFICIAL" creators..

[tjbyrum1]

I'm just trying to make a point Nero. I don't see why Brits are complaining now when we've been through similar situations in past game.

Russians don't get mad when we killed them in those CoD games (I guess they were Russians, I don't know).

[FL4PPYflap]

I can't remember which trailer this was in, but Connor says "I will strike down the enemy in the name of liberty, regardless of their allegiance."
Yet they still did not show Connor killing a colonist or someone else besides a redcoat.
I don't really have a problem with Connor siding with the colonists, I am just confused to why they haven't showed any evidence of what they claim. (Connor kills colonists)

[ShaneO7K]

They haven't confirmed it, but if you have been watching the media, that's what you'd think too.

What I am talking about isn't based on what the trailers have shown, but what Hasooon has said Ubisoft has said without proof of his statement. If he gave proof I would gladly agree with him then.

[HaSoOoN-MHD]

Ubisoft uses the Wiki too present certain things. So pretty sure it is accurate.

[Assassin_M]

Ubisoft uses the Wiki too present certain things. So pretty sure it is accurate.

Sometimes it is not, and I right now I cannot be bothered to mention several instances.
but honestly, though ? Which will you believe ? In-game dialogue and database ? or a fan Wiki ?

[HaSoOoN-MHD]

Wiki made by fans who have access too all sorts of resources and that part was sourced?

[Assassin_M]

Wiki made by fans who have access too all sorts of resources and that part was sourced?

What are you arguing ? answer my question, will you follow In-game content or a fan-made site that has access to all resources everyone has access to ?

[HaSoOoN-MHD]

Resources- Made by creators
Wiki would probably be a good choice, since it is easy too access and has all the info bundles into one site.