Ironside was basically paid to advertise this guy. He got tired of the direction the series was taking. He was brought back in for conviction because he liked the personal story. Ubi should've based blacklist as Ironsides last game, with him as the handler for young Splinter Cell recruits coming through like archer. It would of actually made sense and given Ironside a last hurah.Originally Posted by NightGhost1994
Ubisoft just care about how the game appeals to the main stream.
You guys call yourself splinter cell fans wow ,( I'm rooting for the no one voicing Sam fisher) unbelievable you guys don't realise how Micheal ironside is important to the Sam fisher character. Ubisoft just honestly needs to make this a new splinter cell character don't let some noob voice a legendary character. Truly disappointed ,RIP splinter cell.
81 votes now, new character still leading with over half the votes now. Please Ubisoft, please consider this change to the game, I for one really want to see this game succeed and for the series to continue with a breath of fresh air.
I guess he's OK..... but he IS and always will be Whitney Fordman from the Smallville tv show to me.
That mental image just clashes a bit imo.
"You're MINE !"
Fisher doesn't even need to come back in a support role. Just create a new character and have Grim as the head of the agency.
Bring back Fisher in a later game as a cameo.
Just found an interesting quirk in Conviction's credits. For Archer (real name Daniel Robert Sloane-Suarez) his name in the credits was listed as 'John Drake Archer'. Now, if they do end up doing a new protagonist, I rather like the name 'John Drake' for the new guy.
I like the idea of the new guy. He had a lot of intensity in the video documentary thing, and it was great. BUT... he's not Sam Fisher. I have no problem with them making him a new character and having Sam be Lambert 2.0. I always envisioned the game going in this direction, and the new gameplay style is much better suited to a newer, younger character in my opinion. I voted for option two. I don't like what they've done to the series, but they could at least make it make sense!
It's a lot easier to get on board with if they were to make that change. Unfortunately, I'm afraid despite it being the obvious and probably best choice, it won't happen.
Sam as a father figure would also make sense, be a great opportunity for his character development, and would provide awesome friction between him and the new operative. Realistically, how much sense does it make to have the leader of 4E be also be the FIELD AGENT. What if he died?!
Last edited by xCaptainAmazing; 06-06-2012 at 02:17 AM.
Just letting you guys know, you arent getting what you want as much as you plee. Save your breath.
lol same here. I was like "why is Whitney suddenly trying to be tough." Funny thing is Ironside was on Smallville too and both were army men but neither were in the same episode.
FU Ubisoft how do u get rid of Ironside the man that has played Sam Fisher voice since 2002
Posting Permissions
Si1entDark
Reply With Quote
sam3912
