I didn't have a problem with the ending, my problem is that all the endings were basically bad endings, in an RPG like mass effect I expect there to be a few good endings and a few bad ones, they had 3 endings that all led to the same thing: everyone on earth dying. And usually endings are changed based on how you do in a game, if you play as a good guy then you get a good ending and so on. In ME3 you could play it anyway you liked, but then at the end you were just given a choice of what to do. I could have played evil 3 times in a row and got all the different endings




I was a bit surprised they ended it the way they did. but I applaud their nerve. They said the galaxy was on the brink of destruction. and they did not fubar it. The entire game was dark the ending put a more realistic face on the situation. there were quit a few emotive moments in the game. To have allowed the galaxy to be saved without sacrifice would have cheapened the story IMHO. So this is kicking a dead horse. anytime you make a game, there will be people who hate it... Because you did not make "THEIR" game. I don't care how good it is. someone will hate the combat or the graphics. ECT ECT ECT ECT. It was a great series. Can't we just try and keep from taking pop shots at one another and just be happy for once. and look forward to ACIII? Look forward to the CE's for those who want them, and the standard edition for those who do not care.
Reply With Quote

