contrary to belief... Washington was not that great of a general, he was a great leader, but not the best general... he was an decent general at his time.. i mean with respect to the limited resources, manpower he had compared to the British..... but he was no Napoleon
Napoleon was literally a military genius, and arguably had one of the greatest military minds of all time
George Washington was a great, leader and a decent general, but has been criticized alot because of his tactics
washington was a mediocre general at best
With all due respect intended, I'd like to see any one of us take up his job, at that time, and see if we could do any better. I'm sure the man had a lot going for him.
I agree, Napoleon Dynamite would kick his *** any day.
I was talking about bonaparte but. Oh wellOriginally Posted by UrDeviant1
Napoleon was 7 years old when the American Revolution started, so we shouldn't compare the two, they fought in different times.
Ita haec vita hominum ad modicum apparet; quid autem sequatur, quidue praecesserit, prorsus ignoramus.
So this life of man appears for a short space, but of what went before, or what is to follow, we are utterly ignorant.
-- Saint Bede the Venerable
Oh, this changes everything.
facepalm.jpg
He made a good point why you facepalm?
In the GI scans, it said that Connor would meet Washington, someone who was filled with doubt and was not confident in his choices.
---------------------------------
MY TRICORN HAT WEARING BRETHREN, UNITE.
TRICORN HAT WEARING ASSASSINS ARE NOW CANON. THIS IS THE BEST DAY EVER 6/2/12
Posting Permissions
Radman500
Reply With Quote
brick177
