Annecy Q&A - Multiplayer | Forums

[deadly_thought]

Lord knows whats happened! , maybe they blindsided Esco with some freebies and lovely screenshots of AC3: Red Indian adventures!? or hes been Assassinated for asking too many questions?

more likely that they read the questions we posted and decided they didnt know the answers *watches ubisoft backing away slowly toward the carpark*

[ThaFazz]

Well it looks like ubisoft has officially corrupted esco

[deadly_thought]

Well it looks like ubisoft has officially corrupted esco

and now hes dressed as the count desperately trying to kill the last uncorupted....

[TheLeoCrow]

whatever happened with this?

[Sukramo]

Same thing that happened to that mod who said he would find out if 27/31 wells was a bug. Ubisoft dosent care.

Look, there is no echonomy in fixing ACB and ACR because Ubisoft wont make any more money from us. In order for AC3 to work the perfect way it deserves to, the people designing it needs to also play the game. Or at the very least have a close connection with people actualy playing it. But they wont do that.

Also:

1. Remove game type votes at end of games, replace with map vote. Two birds with one stone! As playing MtStMch 3 times in a row isn’t fun!.
2. Remove auto assign different game types if game cant find the type you selected. I don’t want to play another game type, id like to decide for myself. I would rather wait and keep trying for 10minutes than having to go in and out of games!. Alternatively, add a `back out` option if game thoughts you into game type you don’t want.

THIS, THIS, THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Serrachio]

Same thing that happened to that mod who said he would find out if 27/31 wells was a bug. Ubisoft dosent care.

Look, there is no echonomy in fixing ACB and ACR because Ubisoft wont make any more money from us. In order for AC3 to work the perfect way it deserves to, the people designing it needs to also play the game. Or at the very least have a close connection with people actualy playing it. But they wont do that.

I think it's rather pitiful that most games companies now rely more on grabbing as much handfuls of cash as they can get, instead of maintaining a working product.

It would be nice if they would all pull their thumbs out their but.ts (to put it mildly) and be responsible for their creations, instead of believing that just because patches exist, they can shovel out their games with so many problems baked in. The most ironic part too is that Ubisoft would rather patch stuff like cosmetic outfits and then turn around and say that patches cost such and such amount of money, instead of actually fixing something worth it with the money.

[Just Krispy]

Amen brother! Well said....but yet we are supposed to be excited about the prospect of Ubi messing up the 3rd game in 3 years. What ever happened to this Q and A session BTW?

[obliviondoll]

I've told Esco to take a look here on Twitter.

Hopefully he'll actually be paying enough attention to his feed to notice me doing so.

[Mr_Shade]

Due to reasons beyond the original posters control, I'm sorry to say that the questions presented here in this thread, will not be answered.

It was made clear that this may happen in the first post, so to stop any attacks or trolling due to this issue, I am locking the thread.