Which game did you like best? Revelations or Brotherhood? | Forums

[Truemaster2011]

Overall, Brotherhood. I prefer Rome as a setting and really enjoyed fighting the borgia.
I miss ezio's brotherhood robes so much.

[gamertam]

This is no way a biased answer at all. Brotherhood win this contest. Like someone said above, the outfits is kind of an un-appealing, where it were red, and white for Brohood. i didn't like most of the characters in ACR much maybe except Sophia. Brotherhood was the first in multi-player, and top it off. The VR training idea was great.

[SinError]

AC II. AC: R felt like a downgrade, the story sucked comnpared to AC 2 and Brotherhood.

[YuurHeen]

ac:r. the story truely is better. in acb you had the obvious enemy while in acr "nothing is true". in acb everything succeeds and everyone is happy while in acr "everything is permitted".

besides i enoyed altairs 50mins, the tomb missions were a lot more fun, no stupid machine levels, a cool city, better graphics, less desmond and a cool hookblade

[LightRey]

Where's the "I liked them both equally" option?

[blazefp]

Originally posted by assassino151:
Revelations. It had a superior storyline, great setting. The most alive. Great characters and dialogue. Best addition to AC yet.

This ^ without a doubt.

But I rather prefer Ezio from Brotherhood, he's more concerned with people, tries to do everything more stealthier than in ACR.

[PhiIs1618033]

Here's my ranking:

Assassin's Creed >>> Assassin's Creed 2 > Assassin's Creed: Revelations >>> Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood

[Ichthys91]

Originally posted by PhiIs1618033...:
Here's my ranking:

Assassin's Creed >>> Assassin's Creed 2 > Assassin's Creed: Revelations >>> Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood

And here is mine:

Assassin's Creed: Director's Cut

The end.

[iNvidious02]

brotherhood's my favourite, just started it again after finishing ac2 (again) and it looks so much better, its massive and the new features they threw in like combos and recruits were really good.

revelations does not make the same leap, it doesnt look much better than rome, character faces seem to be the only thing improved quite a bit. and gameplay wise its just the hookblade that feels like a new feature, the bomb crafting is half assed and the den defense sucks.

brotherhood > ac2 > revelations > ac1

[Grazel69]

To be honest
AC1, after that everything started going up in a downward way
Ubisoft knew they had a gem in their hand and therefor didn't work as hard on the next games owkay yeah they added stuff, made it less repetitive but that's pretty basic stuff just to make you think they actually made the game better
All of the games after AC1 contained almost no story at all, practically none in Revelations whatsoever, they're just milking the cow untill it's dead without knowing that sometimes it's better to wait a little so they can make games who actually have some substance instead of putting al these useless things in the game
Den defense? just a little gimmick that's in there that no one like but because it's in there people think the games instantly better even if they don't like that part
Desmond missions? whats the point? no story was told there that we didnt know already


but if you really would have me choose which of the 2 is better i'd say Brotherhood it had some really great Ezio story(which doesn't count as real story to me but whatever) and it was a big step forward from AC2 gameplay wise
but between ACB and ACR I don't see that much difference