Another review appeared | Forums

[Nub.Saibot]

On yahoo video games. H5 was given 3.5 out of 5. Mayor cons are, by them, buggy multiplayer and poor game documentation. Although i can say that i agree with that i still think that H5 deserves more than 70%. Multiplayer and documentation can both be seriously improved with upcoming or some other patch. I understand that review is just another opinion but i'm interested in what you have to say people!

[skortzy]

Most of the cons mentioned by all reviews are true
The problem is that everybody weights the importance of these cons on his/her own. For example, I am not bothered to much by the absence of the wait button (because I can press a key), but others might think differently and subtract 5% just for that

I would rate this game, in its current condition, at about 82 - 85%. Once the map editor and the RMG are out, it might get close to 90% (but this is only my review)

[pavel44]

Gamespot gives it 8.2

http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/...icv/index.html

[Lord_Kaboth]

I think Greg Kasavin of Gamespot was fairly generous. He could have nitpicked quite a few other issues like the user interface. Personally I think the lack of a map editor should knock the game back into the between 6-7/10. Perhaps Greg subtly acknowledged the editor would be released later in a patch.

[Nutcrackr]

While I agree that a map editor would be great I hardly think it's absence reduces the score to sub 7/10. Most games nowadays have very little editing tools, those that do usually have them a while after release. If there were less content I'd be more concerned about editing tools.