whats the name of the psychiatrist that proved the subcouncious see the future | Forums

[raaaid]

he would put a electroencefalograma to the subjects show some pictures and notice the results

amazingly the brain reacted to the pictures before the person actually saw them

this experiment is quite famuous, does anybody know who did it so i can research?

[Pirschjaeger]

I've never heard of this but it sounds like something from Russian reseach reports.

Got anymore details?

Fritz

[danjama]

quit playing with his mind fritz we all know it was yuo

[Pirschjaeger]

Interestingly, I saw your avatar and sig before I opened this thread Dan.

Fritz

[Capt.LoneRanger]

I'm pretty sure it was Baron von Münchhausen.

There is also a slight probability I mix him up with David Copperfield.

Honestly, Raaaid, no scientist has EVER prooven that.
I have no doubt that there are things between heaven and earth that is not explainable with the science we know, but nothing in this area has been documented as proof.
The US and Sovjet Union had many scientists working on it during the cold war era, though, and many claimed to have a scientific approach to the area. I know several of these reports and infact they all showed a success rate of about 33-40% of precognition under given circumstances!
Incredible, yes, but statistically most of these tests showed a success-rate of 50% when depending on pure luck....

[Pirschjaeger]

Hi Raaaid,

no doubt what you are referring to was either Dr. Kornhuber's findings(1976) or Dr. Libet's findings(1979).

Details

You guys really should give Raaaid a little more credit. Think back to his firsts posts and his recent posts. A world of difference.

Might be an interesting thread.

Fritz

[raaaid]

thanks a lot exactly what i was looking for

[Pirschjaeger]

Raaaid,

I've often thought that all life is one and although consciously we can't see it, subconsciously we can interact and draw on its resources. I believe that nature is a kind of collective and just as cells make up the organism, each unit of life makes up a natural cognitive that our subconscious can interact with. A simple example might be a school of fish or a flock of birds. They seem to move as one. Even when filmed with a highspeed camera, then watched in slow motion, there's no indication of physical communication.

The experiments you are asking about can be seen as being supportive of my idea.

What do you think?

Fritz

[raaaid]

if you are the one it would be cool all being the same but if you are just a cell...

im more individualist the cells im made of are not me but other individuals which live in comunity

i like the promasonic thinking that each single person is a potential god

we dont have to unite to be all together a god but we can be one without bonding i like to think

i also think that that quote that you have to kill desire for enlightenment is false desire or love is the fuel of nature

id say in religion there are two sides prounity and proindividuality

the devil would be proindividuality god would be pro unity, of coursse im with the devil

[Pirschjaeger]

Raaaid,

who are you posting to? In the beginning it looks like a response to my question but fades off into somewhere else.

Whose quote?

Fritz