***SPOILER WARNING***Why hasn't Farah transformed? | Forums

[compaq_910]

If Farah gave the prince the amulet in SOT how come she didn't transform? [I'm new here and this probably has been posted before but I didn't find it so don't say this has already been posted.]

[compaq_910]

If Farah gave the prince the amulet in SOT how come she didn't transform? [I'm new here and this probably has been posted before but I didn't find it so don't say this has already been posted.]

[DrZapp]

she still has the amulet, if u pay attention to

*SPOILERS*(READ AT OWN RISK) *SPOILERS*
PoPWW - he goes to the island, stops the creation of the sands, never kills the vizier, farah never hands over the amulet, the sands are never found by the maharaja, he never travels to India, Azad, etc. Thus she still has the amulet - the vizier is still alive
End of Spoilers

[Snartty]

Well, doesnt the prince throw away an amulet at the beginig of T2T??

[Kesuvius]

In SOT,he has one,she has one.
And it's probably the "no sands" thing in WW.
You can see the amulet in her hair.

[DrZapp]

Spoilers
Seems like that was another amulet, because Farah still has her amulet (on her head) in TTT
End

[Snartty]

thats very strange.............

[DrZapp]

I am confused about what amulet is what and who does it belong to..

[compaq_910]

It would be useful if we had a pic or video for proof or somthing like that.

[Snartty]

well, the prince kept hold of his amulet through all of the time traveling things, but because he re-winded time making it as if Farah never gave it to him, maybe she stil has hers, and he still has his

(just a thoery)