manhattan project pack | Forums

[maikkelis95]

one question. will it be on consoles?

[Dez1990]

yes

[AverageSoldier]

Good to know that RUSE is shown to be a game about tricking your enemy and then they have a DLC that gives people nukes.

[Warforger]

Originally posted by AverageSoldier:
Good to know that RUSE is shown to be a game about tricking your enemy and then they have a DLC that gives people nukes.

I'm sure there will be more to it then that, take the 3 player operation when the AI gets the nuke, it isn't until towards the end when they get it and then the air power is responsible to destroy them.

[AverageSoldier]

If its an artillary unit it would just make people want to defend untill they get it. Sucide an air recon and click something when the air recon get a tiny glimpse. I just find it strange that a game that is about tricking your enemy has something that could just destroy entire bases and armies. Whats the point of trickery when you get that.

People won't get harder. Its just most would ve even more boring to kill because they sit their trying to uptech to their 'wonder unit'

If this nuke is however a very slow bomber then it atleast has the enemy need to attempt an attack.

[Warforger]

Originally posted by AverageSoldier:
If its an artillary unit it would just make people want to defend untill they get it. Sucide an air recon and click something when the air recon get a tiny glimpse. I just find it strange that a game that is about tricking your enemy has something that could just destroy entire bases and armies. Whats the point of trickery when you get that.

People won't get harder. Its just most would ve even more boring to kill because they sit their trying to uptech to their 'wonder unit'

If this nuke is however a very slow bomber then it atleast has the enemy need to attempt an attack.

Well what you could do is build a secondary HQ and build fake buildings along with limiting the forces even more, thus if you get the other gun to fire first at the wrong target you can fire yours and get rid of it.

[AverageSoldier]

Originally posted by Warforger:
Well what you could do is build a secondary HQ and build fake buildings along with limiting the forces even more, thus if you get the other gun to fire first at the wrong target you can fire yours and get rid of it.

Reading that ****ed me off more then imagening from one comment.
So you have someone to use a nuke arty on something fake so you can use a nuke arty on them. That means that everyone is just going to be using nuke arty like little ****ing noobs.

The nuke better not be a long tom, and its will be even worse if only USA can get it.

[maikkelis95]

Originally posted by AverageSoldier:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Warforger:
Well what you could do is build a secondary HQ and build fake buildings along with limiting the forces even more, thus if you get the other gun to fire first at the wrong target you can fire yours and get rid of it.

Reading that ****ed me off more then imagening from one comment.
So you have someone to use a nuke arty on something fake so you can use a nuke arty on them. That means that everyone is just going to be using nuke arty like little ****ing noobs.

The nuke better not be a long tom, and its will be even worse if only USA can get it. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
make it cost like 500, research takes 5 min, producing another 5 min, only 1 per game can be produced. And of course everyone gets it. british and USA gets it as Long Tom, Germans as Morser (OR NUCLEAR V2 launch pad and a V2)Italians as Obice, Russians as Gaubitsa etc.

and you dont have to play the nuclear war, play normal 2vs2 if you hate the nukes

[maikkelis95]

Originally posted by maikkelis95:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by AverageSoldier:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Warforger:
Well what you could do is build a secondary HQ and build fake buildings along with limiting the forces even more, thus if you get the other gun to fire first at the wrong target you can fire yours and get rid of it.

Reading that ****ed me off more then imagening from one comment.
So you have someone to use a nuke arty on something fake so you can use a nuke arty on them. That means that everyone is just going to be using nuke arty like little ****ing noobs.

The nuke better not be a long tom, and its will be even worse if only USA can get it. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
make it cost like 500, research takes 5 min, producing another 5 min, only 1 per game can be produced. And of course everyone gets it. british and USA gets it as Long Tom, Germans as Morser (OR NUCLEAR V2 launch pad and a V2)Italians as Obice, Russians as Gaubitsa etc.

and you dont have to play the nuclear war, play normal 2vs2 if you hate the nukes </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

And btw im waiting it because of the total war and 3vs3 games

[EvanTheBeast]

i think this is a good update, I love the 3v3 battles. The nuke thing will just be a fun side thing.