Nation Poll | Forums

[Redbanana27]

Katyusha innacuracy is a trait,being able to wipe out two to threebuildings and groups of unarmoured troops at once. And you say you need more than one, there only 30 (after the 140 from proto) and no research
Also gaubitsa is very good priced, pushka isu, arty positions... Russians win hands down

[weedbazooka]

@rossocool, the m15 research is fast. Who researches that tank without a few more armor bases. $20 a pop you always crank out at least 2 or 3.
Artillery, great point about the japs. But at $20 for a russian base, it doubles the production time of everything. What it costs you to produce one aa base, ill crank out 2.
Now for best AA, you gotta go usa. Im judging it by the greatest air threat, the typhoon. It one shots every type of AA. So why you spend over $150 on a prototype AA while it only cost USA, $45. Cheaper to spam m16's and for the price, does a better job against air.
But great points in all!!!

[silentswordy]

Originally posted by weedbazooka:
@rossocool, the m15 research is fast. Who researches that tank without a few more armor bases. $20 a pop you always crank out at least 2 or 3.
Artillery, great point about the japs. But at $20 for a russian base, it doubles the production time of everything. What it costs you to produce one aa base, ill crank out 2.
Now for best AA, you gotta go usa. Im judging it by the greatest air threat, the typhoon. It one shots every type of AA. So why you spend over $150 on a prototype AA while it only cost USA, $45. Cheaper to spam m16's and for the price, does a better job against air.
But great points in all!!!

Could not agree more, why you would say italy has best AA is beyond me, why say Italy when USA can do it all but better/cheaper especialy when they have bofors at $10ea, a medium AA gun. Italy has a $15 flak, a light AA gun.
Italy has only got moblie AA at 1945 while USA has it from 1942+ as well as having a heavy AA bunker. I will agree that Italy has an ok AA capacity but the fact that the only readily available AA is $15 is a massive disadvantage, even more so when the AA/art base is $45. M16 is the best AA in the game at $15 for mobile medium AA without research and from a $35 base is actualy cheaper than Italy's wooded AA when you take in the price of the AA/art base

Don't know why you would say that germany has best infantry as well when their barracks is $30 which is pretty steep and their infantry is slow to produce. USSR heavies can do the same job as the German heavies but with elite weapons and 4kph faster as well as faster production. If Japan was on the list I would of chosen them, however their AT capacity is poor. Also notice that the devs were going to put a bazooka on them but noticed it would be amazingly overbalanced so changed it, on the picture of the infantry shows them with launchers and when they're just about to engage armour they pull launchers out of no where and decide not to use them...

[Redbanana27]

i also dont agree with people decision to choose UK for best AT
Russia

[rossocool]

Originally posted by Redbanana27:
i also dont agree with people decision to choose UK for best AT
Russia

For only $25 research you can get the Archer with 2 armour, 400m range and only $10 each. I believe the USSR (NOT Russia) pays $50 research and then $15 each for the same thing. Therefore the UK (NOT Britain) can quickly deploy a good early-game AT force. I'll admit the next step of $75 is a bit steep but worth it for the Firefly. This can fire over 500m, has a turret so doesn't need to stop moving and is only $25. The SU-100 after the same total rsearch cost has to stop moving to fire which puts it at a disadvantage.

[Redbanana27]

russia costs $25 research for a three armour 400m (su-85) which costs $15 each... and then $50 research for a 4 armour 500m (su-100) for $25

therefore it is cheaper for the "russians" to get the su-100's

sorry but russias better it may not have a turret but how difficult is it to press the Y button?

[robbinx730]

I find sextons and priests more usefull then non-tank arty, so i choised USA as best arty. although japan arty got close, i love the speed on there tank arty. USSR has best AT i believe, there tank might not have a turret, but you get 4 armor instead of 3 for it. i also think that italy has the best AA, cheap armored one from proto, and seeing italy needs proto most of the time it's great.

[Redbanana27]

italy does not need a prototype what are you on about... your clearly not someone that goes italy a lot are you...
all you need is a barracks an armour and an arty base to get the flak 88 guns and obice
thats it
you can get a prototype but the only very very good unit is the breda

[robbinx730]

I stopped reading after you said obice

[Redbanana27]

obice although $70 is brilliant

o ye sorry the flak 88 is in the at base

anyhow you do not need the prototype base