Page 1 of 105 1231151101 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 1047

Thread: A passing though about the Me-262... | Forums

  1. #1
    There was a documentary on air yesterday and I was watching a segment about the Me-262 it occurred to me that the type is routinely mentioned as a revolutionary design ahead of its time - and yet few major post-WW2 aircraft types had the same basic design (shark-like fuselage, one engine under each wing).
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    _________________________
    Hewlett Packard pavilion 6635 200 mhz
    128 mb ram
    Nvidia GEforce 2mx 64 MB
    Microsoft sidewinder 3D
    Packard bell 15 inch monocromatic monitor
    Maxtor 100, 4 gb hard drive
    1.44 mb floppy drive
    Creative Sound Blaster 1.0,
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  3. #3


    Pwned by Loco
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    1,108
    As a war fighter you are correct. Pod mount engines are much easier and thus cheaper to maintain. It was a simple design, but for WWII era aircraft it was ahead of its time. The engine design was also superior, just lacked better alloys in the fans and compression chamber.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    Senior Member DrHerb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    2,628
    Yep Whittle's engine was a centrifugal flow while the Jumo was an axial flow. Centrifugal flow engines weigh more and are less aerodynamic than axial flow gas turbines

    Proudly Flying on Hyperlobby as _AH_Prop http://aceshigh.ws/forum/index.php
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    I thought I read or saw a show that stated that the Russians had jet technology about the same time as the British and the Germans. And I think there was a hint that the Russians broke the sound barrier around the same time as America did.
    Pinup of the month-
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  7. #7
    In Russia, you dont fly plane, plane flies YOU.
    _________________________
    Hewlett Packard pavilion 6635 200 mhz
    128 mb ram
    Nvidia GEforce 2mx 64 MB
    Microsoft sidewinder 3D
    Packard bell 15 inch monocromatic monitor
    Maxtor 100, 4 gb hard drive
    1.44 mb floppy drive
    Creative Sound Blaster 1.0,
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  8. #8
    Originally posted by Loco-S:
    In Russia, you dont fly plane, plane flies YOU.
    Yakov, you kill me.

    Early Soviet jet engines were knock off of the German engines. Kind of like early American jet engines were knockoffs of the ___________.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  9. #9
    The McDonnell Moonbat was a radical design for it's time with the engines and wing blending into the fuseluge. First submitted to the Army Air Corp in 1941.


    McDonnell XP-67 "Moonbat"


    All right, they're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us... they can't get away this time. Lieutenant General Lewis B."Chesty" Pull
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  10. #10
    Originally posted by Waldo.Pepper:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Loco-S:
    In Russia, you dont fly plane, plane flies YOU.
    Yakov, you kill me.

    Early Soviet jet engines were knock off of the German engines. Kind of like early American jet engines were knockoffs of the ___________. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I thought early Russian jet engines where developed from the "British Rolls Royce Nene"...
    I'm just a Rock 'n' Roll footnote...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

Page 1 of 105 1231151101 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •