Good hunting,
Cajun76
Check it, bleed. Bro... was on! Didn't trip. But the folks was freakin', man. Hey, and the pilots were laid to the bone, Home. So Blood hammered out and jammed jet ship. Tightened that bad sucker inside the runaway like a mother. Sheet. - Airplane II
So, what did we learn? Always connect your cables properly, or else some particles will mess up your experiment.![]()
If nothing else, the possibilities fired people's imaginations and exposed others to concepts rarely discussed around the "water cooler". And since Einstein has been vindicated once again, it's still amazing just how far ahead of his time he was.
Good hunting,
Cajun76
Check it, bleed. Bro... was on! Didn't trip. But the folks was freakin', man. Hey, and the pilots were laid to the bone, Home. So Blood hammered out and jammed jet ship. Tightened that bad sucker inside the runaway like a mother. Sheet. - Airplane II
The problem with this statement is that you chose to cancel out the Earth's movement and rotation, etc. Why not "heap" the motion of the train as well, so that we're right back to a 50m/h ball?
You've got to define a frame of reference for anything to make sense. (Are you an observer on the train, ground, moon?)
The funny thing about light is that in a vacuum, it will always appear to moving at c no matter what frame of reference you define. ie, if you were bionic and were traveling .9c through space and turned on a light, the beam wouldn't appear to moving at .1c....it will appear to leave at c. Furthermore, to a still observer watching you, the beam will only appear to move at c, not 1.9c.
The behavior of light gets funnier, the more you look into it. Is it a wave or a particle? Depends on how you observe it.
Technically speaking, scientific dogma is not science.Scientific dogma and religious dogma are no different.
A scientist doesn't necessarily wear a white coat - he/she makes conclusions of observations and remains skeptical of his/her own and others' conclusions.
Last edited by Luno13; 04-24-2012 at 08:20 PM.