View Poll Results: do you like inclusion of WMDs in endwar?
me......i hate em.to be honest,using them does feel nice,b

Voters
33. You may not vote on this poll
  • good idea

    20 60.61%
  • bad idea

    13 39.39%
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: POLL: WMDs good or bad | Forums

  1. #1
    Banned cloud-strif_921's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    116
    i just wana ask a question to all out there,its a simple awnser,you either love em or hate em
     

  2. #2
    Banned cloud-strif_921's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    116
    i just wana ask a question to all out there,its a simple awnser,you either love em or hate em
     

  3. #3
    Senior Member b_4721's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    3,756
    I just wish it was one use per match like crash, it sucks in a close match when the other guy only wins because you triggered defcon first and he got first wmd, his recharges first and kills what you had left.
     

  4. #4
    Banned cloud-strif_921's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    116
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by b_4721:
    I just wish it was one use per match like crash, it sucks in a close match when the other guy only wins because you triggered defcon first and he got first wmd, his recharges first and kills what you had left. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    yep,i agree totally,iv lost alota matches that way,like so much else in this game its unbalanced.it just feels like where is the strategy in placing yr units in key positions for an ambush etc
     

  5. #5
    Only thing that makes them cheap is EMP-nuking. Sorry guys but if youve lost because of a WMD then it's your fault for not spreading your men as soon as defcon happens.(i do it when i know its coming)
     

  6. #6
    I hope the good idea thing ment that you like wmd's. for i voted for pro wmd; I just think it should be a one use item.
     

  7. #7
    Senior Member b_4721's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    3,756
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Fafner_Ni:
    Only thing that makes them cheap is EMP-nuking. Sorry guys but if youve lost because of a WMD then it's your fault for not spreading your men as soon as defcon happens.(i do it when i know its coming) </div></BLOCKQUOTE>


    Not talking about right after defcon smart ***.
     

  8. #8
    Senior Member Pieman13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    2,421
     

  9. #9
    They feel a bit spammy to me. Seeing them go off every round gets old...
     

  10. #10
    I'm ok with them, they can turn the tide of battle(rarely). But I'd want them limited to one for each side for the whole match. I'm tired of playing hour long matches just because both sides are wating for the WMD to reload.
     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •