Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 29

Thread: >>>>IMPORTANT<<<< | Forums

  1. #1
    >>>>IMPORTANT NOTICE<<<<

    Since the game takes place in one giant city, the missions could be branching. Each portion of the city could have it's own objectives.
    When you complete a mission, that portion of the city is done, and it becomes a friendy Zone where you can re-arm and heal up for the next outing.
    You then have to fight your way to another part of the city which will trigger other missions.
    FOR EXAMPLE:
    If you enter a mission triggering area from the north, that means your starting point is the north. The same thing goes for the south, east west, etc etc. You choose how to engage.
    Tasks in between missions could unlock stuff like the original GR. Maybe relieving U.N. troops or rescuing hostages etc etc.

    This is the next Generation console and GTA San Andreas is able to make a large city on the PS2. So I know It's possible with the XBOX 360.

    >>>>MY WISH LIST<<<<

    1. BLOOD - I want to see blood so I will be able to know where exactly someone is hit, and head shots would be alot more satisfying, unlike GR2.

    2. MEDICS - I would like to see medics in the multiplayer portion of the game. For the snipers out there, this would be a blessing. The enemy will try tend to the wounds of their fallen comrade who is bleeding to death in the open, He was hit by a sniper in the leg which was the plan all along huh? BANG...another man goes down as he tries to tend to the wound.

    3. ATC - I would like to see an Advanced Tactical Center created for GR3. I konw UBI doesn't do that part, but I thought I'd add it.

    4. SILENCED WEAPONS - I would love to be able to pick an enemy off without giving away my location.

    5. MAX PLAYER INCREASE - Since this game is being developed on a next gen console, I think it would be possible to upgrade the maximum amount of players from sixteen.

    5. 3RD PERSON VIEW - I know alot of people hate it, but I love it. It adds more to the game when you can see your character in action. The traditional FPS view looked like they were just running around holding a video camera.

    6. SNIPER LOCATIONS - I hope the building in Mexico have interiors because north Korea's don't. I would like to go to the roof top or high window and snipe an enemy crossing the street.

    7. NO LINEAR MISSIONS - Considering the fact that the entire campaign is in urban settings. I hope the designers don't create road blocks after road blocks just so we will follow a certain direction.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    Originally posted by striker_2k5:
    5. 3RD PERSON VIEW - I know alot of people hate it, but I love it. It adds more to the game when you can see your character in action. The traditional FPS view looked like they were just running around holding a video camera.
    Strikers agree on everything except this. I was raised on the old Ghost Recon, I loved First Person View.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Suspended Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    195
    Hell no, ubi has to let in the 3rd person view.. its 10 times better then 1st person imo.
    they could always leave the option of 1st person or 3rd...
    I also want there to be blood in the game, in gr2 when i shoot at an enemy, I had the feeling that I was shooting at some kind of muppet instead of a human being with flesh and all.
    Lastly I have a question: will you be able to walk with the 1st person view we saw in the vids. I saw that you had to stood still first in order to bring up the view where you see your gun.. so anybody know if you can walk with the 1st person view..? then it would look alot like rainbowsix and counter strike and I love that..
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    XyZspineZyX
    Guest
    Splinterz all of the pre release footage for GR2 showed ONLY the new game view. not because the 1st person view wasnt there but because they wanted to show of the new game view. Bearing that in mind you most likely wont see any footage with the 1st person but it will be there (it better had be anyway lol). So in other words yes you will be able to walk in 1st person if thats what you wanted, and yes i imagine you will be able to preset the preference for 1st person in your profile
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    Suspended Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    195
    Yeah but i want to know if you can WALK in first person and actually SEE your GUN, not just only your crosshair
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    Originally posted by striker_2k5:


    5. 3RD PERSON VIEW - I know alot of people hate it, but I love it. It adds more to the game when you can see your character in action. The traditional FPS view looked like they were just running around holding a video camera.
    So you like to cheat? What makes you think you could see around a crate or rock if you were kneeling behind it and see someone on the opposite side in real life? 3rd person views do not belong in a first person shooter.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  7. #7
    For realism nothing beats the FPV. In real life you cannot see yourself moving, so I prefer to use the FPV.

    Yeah, I know you also do not have a reticle hanging in the air in real life, but that is why I have proposed having a screen with no gun or reticle, and clicking the right stick would bring up iron sights/optics etc...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  8. #8
    Originally posted by WhiteKnight77:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by striker_2k5:


    5. 3RD PERSON VIEW - I know alot of people hate it, but I love it. It adds more to the game when you can see your character in action. The traditional FPS view looked like they were just running around holding a video camera.
    So you like to cheat? What makes you think you could see around a crate or rock if you were kneeling behind it and see someone on the opposite side in real life? 3rd person views do not belong in a first person shooter. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    LOL...It ain't cheating dumb ***, the option is available for all players to use. You make it sound as though I hack into my apponants xbox and lock them in first person view. They can use it too. If you want to use FPV only be my guest but that aint gonna make me do the same. LOL
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  9. #9
    Its not considered cheating if everyone is using 3rd person view too..
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  10. #10
    Originally posted by StrikerD:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by striker_2k5:
    5. 3RD PERSON VIEW - I know alot of people hate it, but I love it. It adds more to the game when you can see your character in action. The traditional FPS view looked like they were just running around holding a video camera.
    Strikers agree on everything except this. I was raised on the old Ghost Recon, I loved First Person View. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>
    The Truth is UBI wants A LOT of people to buy their game right? Which brought in more ppl?? Video Cam View[aka first person] or the Third Person view. I think Ubi will be trying to bring newer generations of people in not just keep the Hardcore first gen. ghost recon fanboys. Its just like all the Halo people b*tching because Halo 2 isnt Halo 1. Things change. You have to adapt or dont spend the 60 bucks or whatever it will be.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •