EW: TOW Tournament | Forums

[kinggunplay]

a tournament will be too hard to organize people are all on at different times so its hard to schedule fights when someone is not online

next playing as all 3 factions will take entirely too long to actually finish this tournament

an third some people would disagree if to skirmish or TOW. The problem is in a skirmish with mainly 2 stripes it woudnt be a real fight when i use to skirmish it was never serious cuz its not anyones actual battlion we would start killing each others units for no reason its just not competitive....

[weedbazooka]

I have been ****ed off for about 4 dayz now. I got SOCOM4, it looks much better than before and some nerds got mad, hacked, and shut down the network. Now they got the real hackers (FBI) on their a$$e$ and WHEN caught, gonna get terrorism charges. Why dont they hack into North Korea or Chinese financial databases or something substantive. This isnt a productive hack "nerds!!!!"

[skittlenlolipop]

@weed, dude u never played me!! maybe it was on another account but i never EVER played anyone by the name of weed bazooka...an since you talk so much let me b the first to enter the tournament an You are the first person i challenge...

[skittlenlolipop]

first! all we have to decide is are we going to do this in theater or in skirmish....i have changed the poll that people may cast a vote on weather they prefer a theater tournament or a skirmish tournament! I vote for theater!!

[kinggunplay]

well eagle u addressed one of my points that still does not solve times people are online and in TOW some will say they had unfair maps etc. just too hard for a tournament

[i33mgsthreat]

As I thought , another useless thread. now your challenging people in a tournament? lol... If you want it to happen then do as I suggested. If people cant find the time to play then they shouldnt enter tournament. Give each round a week to play out. That should allow people to fit 1 game into their schedule. 2 factions only ( you have to limit the variables as much as possible. each match consist of 2 games. tiebreaker goes to most units defeated, the least reserves used.
p.s. since i used the word smackdown im only assuming weed bazooka was replying 2 me. Which if thats the case he and ossi played their jsf accounts against me at rondane and being that i was talking about bazooka teams that would be irrelevant. I do remember winning 3 in a row against SGB and Weed bazooka at rondane when they had fool supports. its been a long time so i wouldn't expect someone to remember. Then again i was just saying i remember beating bazooka teams b4.

[weedbazooka]

Being that me and ossi didnt play on maps with full support that often, mixed with you beating me and him 3 times in a row is a joke Threat. Ill ask lol ossi if lol he remembers lol that. Oh and if you say i played with sgb(coby) bazooka in a 2x2 for 3 games is more of a joke lol. I didnt even probably play more than 3 or 4 4x4's with him. But ask him yourself if im lying lol.

[i33mgsthreat]

WOW you always talk about everyone elses reading comprehension. I didnt say anything about playing you and ossi 3 games in a row or anything about supports against u2. If your comment about rondane and someone evac'in then I apologize. If it was then we are talking about the same game , which means since the topic at that time was bazookas I fail to understand why you would mention a game where you wasn't weed bazooka. Also I said you and SGB. nothing about 4v4.
My specialty is putting people in their place also. Maybe thats why im so critical sometimes. its all good though lol.... SGB coulda been tipsy and I dont remember who I was with. I know we meet up random though. Plus I was there I lol dont lol need to lol ask ANYONE lmao...

[redbullking84]

[QUOTE]Originally posted by VR-Homicide2010:
Yeah,

I really wanna destroy you haha.


U wanna hope so!!!!

[StuffRPieHole_1]

Wow, hold on boys, lets not all get our tail feathers in a ruffle!! Let me clarify things if I can. Weed, if you look back in the thread (page #1 of this thread) you will see that you did use the term "Smack Down" towards Little Skittles in your post towards the bottom of the page (as if he(skittles)had said that he put the smack down on you). However, if you look up 2 posts you will see that Threat originally used that ref. "Smack Down" to address my post regarding the Bazookas. But that was Threat Addressing my post, not little skittles addressing you. But when you replied to little lolipop, you used "smack down" as if Skittles said that to you. So there is a bit of a mix-up. Now if this post dosent spin you around and mix you up more, your not alone, as I think im also confused now.