Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: *off topic* what did omaha really look like? | Forums

  1. #1
    because in Medal Of Honor frontline there are 2 big concrete bunkers

    in Saving Private Ryan there is only 1

    and in cod2br1 they just hve mg nests and the small bunkers have artillery guns in them
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    type Omaha Beach in Google.


    Omaha Beach action map


    "There is nothing more exhilirating, than to be shot at with no results"
    Sir W.L.S. Churchill
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    were there any bunkers that looked like the ones from saving private ryan of medal of honor frontline and if there were bunkers like that hom many were there
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Hi

    At Omaha Beach there were no such bunkers as in SPR or MOHAA, altough trough these movie and game we were shown that massive bunkers defended the beach.
    There were concrete emplacments of course, but not even close to the size shown in the Movie.
    The bluff was a perfect defense as it is, plus Trenches gave it much more defense.
    I am sure there were deep concrete dugouts as well.
    But imagine this:
    You running trough 100-200 meter of beach under MG fire and artillery facing an enemy dug in high up on a pretty steep Bluff. It was a carnage as we all know.


    "There is nothing more exhilirating, than to be shot at with no results"
    Sir W.L.S. Churchill
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    gustace is right. MOH really overdid their bunkers on Omaha, they were waaaayy too big. Although SPR's bunker was smaller than the ones in MOH, it still is bigger than the bunkers you would have seen on Omaha.

    The most annoying innaccuracies in both IMOH and SPR is that there's no sea wall, instead there's a sand dune that they call a seawall
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    it looked, well, bluntly, bloddy and rocky
    "No good decision was ever made in a swivel chair"
    - George S. Patton
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  7. #7
    Originally posted by ACEofSPADES705:
    gustace is right. MOH really overdid their bunkers on Omaha, they were waaaayy too big. Although SPR's bunker was smaller than the ones in MOH, it still is bigger than the bunkers you would have seen on Omaha.

    The most annoying innaccuracies in both IMOH and SPR is that there's no sea wall, instead there's a sand dune that they call a seawall
    not to mention there is no road
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  8. #8
    what are bluffs
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  9. #9
    Senior Member danjama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    7,240
    This but at the top of the beach:


    "The future belongs to those who believe in the beauty of their dreams"

    http://jamathewriter.blogspot.com/
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/danjamafotos/
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  10. #10
    The sea wall at omaha and utah were made up of shingle (pebbles) wich had been washed up by the tide. The germans usually tended to fortify these with barbed wire, tank traps etc. At juno beach (canadian beach landing) there was no shingle, it was sandy and not very well fortified, the beach just went straight onto buildings and they got inland first as a result. off topic soz.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •