Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: FS is NOT dead: Aerosoft Flight Simulator 2012 | Forums

  1. #1
    _____________________
    i7 860 @ 3.8Ghz
    4x2GB RAM @ 1725 6-8-6-24 T2
    nvidia 560 ti @ 950Mhz
    Windows 7 home 64 bit
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    _____________________
    i7 860 @ 3.8Ghz
    4x2GB RAM @ 1725 6-8-6-24 T2
    nvidia 560 ti @ 950Mhz
    Windows 7 home 64 bit
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Senior Member ploughman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    6,963
    Good, something else to wait for. Character building I call it.

    Here's something else.

    Fighter Ops.

    They're cunning though, you pay to see game development updates. If only Oleg'd thought of that?
    _______________________________________

    Dum spiro, spero.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Senior Member VF-17_Jolly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    1,925
    Aw c**p I haven't built a rig to run the last one yet
    Si vis pacem para bellum
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    Or maybe even...

    http://www.x-plane.com/
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Bremspropeller:
    Or maybe even...

    http://www.x-plane.com/ </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    How is X-Plane compared to FSX?
    [img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v343/PublicPhotoAccount2/il2/we-the-people-american-cons***ution.jpg[/img]
    This we'll defend
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  7. #7
    Senior Member skarden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Adelaide, Australia
    Posts
    1,265
    I'v been following this for a little now and it looks like aerosoft are really going to do this well if all goes ahead,they seem very very keen to listen to the customers needs and wants as a priority over nearly all else,somethng microsoft never really did.

    Also doed anyone here actually know an ETA for fighterops? from what I'v seen it really does look fanastic but I'll be dammed if I'll pay just to see development pics,which is an idea that turned me off it initially.
    well that and the fact by the time its released I'll probably be purchasing my first fully interactive holodeck
    "It's a shallow life that doesn't give a person a few scars."
    --Garrison Keillor.
    US humorist & radio broadcaster

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  8. #8
    Senior Member Treetop64's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    3,576
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Choctaw111:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Bremspropeller:
    Or maybe even...

    http://www.x-plane.com/ </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    How is X-Plane compared to FSX? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    It's Ok, depending on how you like to fly. If you like AI traffic, filing flight plans, planning for weather, communicating with controllers, etc., then FSX is the way to go. If you simply like flying the plane with nothing else to worry about, and creating your own craft, then X-Plane might fit the bill.
    ------------------------------



    AndyJWest - "Raaaid managed to get CloD to run on an NVidia 8500 GT - but then, he's Raaaid, and he is, shall we say, 'unorthodox'."
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  9. #9
    You shouldn't forget to mention that X-plane has a much smaller community than Fs - but that's due to change in the future.

    It has lots of potential to be discovered by most people.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  10. #10
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Treetop64:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Choctaw111:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Bremspropeller:
    Or maybe even...

    http://www.x-plane.com/ </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    How is X-Plane compared to FSX? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

    It's Ok, depending on how you like to fly. If you like AI traffic, filing flight plans, planning for weather, communicating with controllers, etc., then FSX is the way to go. If you simply like flying the plane with nothing else to worry about, and creating your own craft, then X-Plane might fit the bill. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>My avitar's worthy aircraft is an X-Plane flyable. My primary draw to FSX is that it simulates the RL civilian flight experience, which definately include flight plans, ATC, and traffic. I was bummed when MS axed FS for there were holes in FSX that I wished filled by a later release.
    _____________________
    i7 860 @ 3.8Ghz
    4x2GB RAM @ 1725 6-8-6-24 T2
    nvidia 560 ti @ 950Mhz
    Windows 7 home 64 bit
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •