Page 1 of 17 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 170

Thread: The hero in battle | Forums

  1. #1
    I hope the hero will appear in battlefield . The hero should be more important just as warcraft 3,and more personality .
    Though in the hero 4 ,the hero is a indepent unit but besides profession ,there is no different, I hope each hero has his owen ability
    and more essential,with the level growing up the hero his owen skill will be more usefull
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    I hope the hero will appear in battlefield . The hero should be more important just as warcraft 3,and more personality .
    Though in the hero 4 ,the hero is a indepent unit but besides profession ,there is no different, I hope each hero has his owen ability
    and more essential,with the level growing up the hero his owen skill will be more usefull
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    I think that there has already been made a decision to pull off the heroes out of the combat, but keep them more involved than in Heroes 3. Correct me if I'm wrong.

    But, I must admit that heroes were overpowered in Heroes 4. They could easily defeat any army, especially when using immortality potions , so a game turned out to give us more boring stuff than challenge. So it would be better to turn back to the roots a.k.a. Heroes 1,2,3
    ___________________________
    "Heroes 3 forever, and ever" fan
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    I like the Hero as a general, far away from the battlefield. I don't want him to interfere with bloodshed. On the other hand, i vote for special abilities that has impact on the troops.
    ---------------------------------------------------------
    "Don't bother me...arghhh... i'm working on something."--BIG MEK--
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    As long as "more involved" makes the hero more than a mindless statistic booster, it's fine by me.
    _________________________________
    Better known as Marelt Ekiran
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    if you keep heroes on battlefield...

    please ! just 1 hero not more !

    I don't wanna see again Dungeons&Dragons Aventurers Party !!!! ( like 5-6 heroes + 4th level monster )
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  7. #7
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Marelt:
    As long as "more involved" makes the hero more than a mindless statistic booster, it's fine by me. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    My opinion excactly. Then again, I did like the idea on heroes in combat that HoMM 4 brought up. Mabye if Nival somehow balanced it. But I guess just time can show us anyway
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  8. #8
    I actually like having the heroes on the battlefield, but then it makes HOMM more RPG rather than TBS.
    Maybe this is the reason why many people don't like HOMM4...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  9. #9
    I did like the hero System in heroes 4.
    It gives also more realety to the name of the game "HEROES of might and magic" and not "CREATURES of might might and magic and the hero.."
    Also it gave a lot more variation in games i have played.
    Personal opinion is: The game should be based on heroes and creatures are there to support the heroes. But as already mentioned I believe already choises about this are made.
    Can also live with the idea of 1 hero on the battlefield. Just like the system of heroes 4 more.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  10. #10
    People, a hero is a hero.He must ehtecipeit in batle after all the game is called Heroes of Might and Magic 5.Heroes are to be the importantist.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

Page 1 of 17 12311 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •