Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: RADEON X800 and 9800 PRO and Lomac CHARTS! | Forums

  1. #1
    If already seen, please excuse-
    Interesting charts and graphs here...


    http://www.firingsquad.com/print_art...rticle_id=1478

    Lomac is Down abot 3/4 the way. If you look close, they are comparing a 3200+ with a 9800 pro vs a 3400+ with a X800. Interesting info on there anyway.
    AMD Athlon 64-bit 3400+ 1600mhz HyperTransport |K8V mobo | 1 Gig Kingston DDR 3200 | ATI X800 Pro | cats 4.7 beta |X45 | DX9.0b | 19 LCD ViewSonic | TrackIR2 | SoundTech ST8T AND Bose 100 Monitors
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    If already seen, please excuse-
    Interesting charts and graphs here...


    http://www.firingsquad.com/print_art...rticle_id=1478

    Lomac is Down abot 3/4 the way. If you look close, they are comparing a 3200+ with a 9800 pro vs a 3400+ with a X800. Interesting info on there anyway.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Whoa, check that scaling:



    X800 Pro is definately a great card for Lomac.

    ==================================

    ==================================
    Marvin in hyperlobby
    ==================================

    ==================================
    Marvin in hyperlobby
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    That shows how the graphic card was the limiting factor and by using the X800 the processor is the limiting factor.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by dmpr:
    That shows how the graphic card was the limiting factor and by using the X800 the processor is the limiting factor.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Really?

    What I meant to show was how the X800 Pro scales between the different CPUs...an XP 2100 gets better frames than the 3400 with a 9800XT, on 1600x1200, no AA.

    The 9800XT pegs at 1280x1024, while the X800 Pro still scales at 1600x1200 - 4xAA. Awesome!

    (Only slightly though...imagine upgrading from a XP2100 to a 3400+ and getting a 5fps increase )

    ==================================

    ==================================
    Marvin in hyperlobby
    ==================================

    ==================================
    Marvin in hyperlobby
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    And where are the P4 charts?

    HOMEGROWN
    System Spec's:
    Windows XP SP1,
    2.8 GHz Intel P4B@3.1 GHz,
    Aopen AX4B-533 Tube MB,
    Telefunken 6922 Tube,
    1024Mb PC2700,
    5xWD 80Gb. SE drives(4xRAID-0)
    Promise TX2000 IDE RAID card,
    Plextor 708A DVD-RW
    SIIG 1394 card,
    Netgear Giga-NIC,
    ATI Radeon 9600 Pro 128Mb
    Omega Radeon Drivers,
    Logitech Freedom Cordless 2.4 Joystick
    MS Cordless KB\Mouse
    Antec Sonata case.
    Viewsonic PF790 CRT
    "The only thing you're ruler of is Jack and Sh*t, and Jack left the building"
    HOMEGROWN
    System Spec's:
    Windows XP SP1,
    2.8 GHz Intel P4B@3.1 GHz,
    Aopen AX4B-533 Tube MB,
    Telefunken 6922 Tube,
    1024Mb PC2700,
    5xWD 80Gb. SE drives(4xRAID0+1)
    Promise TX2000 IDE RAID card,
    Plextor 708A DVD-RW
    SIIG 1394 card,
    Netgear Gi
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  7. #7
    http://forums.ubi.com/eve/forums?a=t...6044#992106044

    read my post (almost at bottom)

    i had clearly staed it had to be the graphics processor as limiting factor


    yesterdays news...

    link to my ftp server
    http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-aviationlover

    msi k7t266 pro ru-2 (ver2.0 6380)
    xp1800+
    768ddc pc2100
    ait 9800xt
    sb live gamer 5.1
    lne 100tx
    logitech 2.4ghz cordless
    ms optical mouse
    generic keyboard
    Operating System = Vista 32bit
    Platform Drivers =
    Video Drivers = nvidia 177.83
    Direct X = latest redist
    Mother Board = ASUS A8N32-SLI-DELUXE
    Processor = AMD x2 4200 oc@ 2.5Ghz
    Hard Drives = (4) WD 80s SATA Raid0 Config
    Sound Card = Onboard S
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  8. #8
    TDBONE1, the "CPU-limited or GPU-limited" determination doesn't apply to software with such dynamic loads as flight sims.

    You can bring a x800 Pro/3400+ setup to its knees with gfx on low, flying over water but with 1000 SAM units in the mission.

    Firingsquad usually use the MiG-29 Intercept track with GFX options on High (the High-preset button), a very graphically intensive track and setup (overcast + water on high) while there's a low unit-count.

    ==================================

    ==================================
    Marvin in hyperlobby
    ==================================

    ==================================
    Marvin in hyperlobby
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  9. #9
    I agree. It's highly GPU dependent. I concluded in my Ram Review, Feb 7, 2004:

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Well, these tests were enlightening on several fronts. First, CPU overclocking and faster RAM does not affect FPS that much in Lockon. I can only conclude from this that at these CPU speeds, other factors are more important in increasing the framerate. I believe this game is actually more video card dependent than CPU, and that my FX5900 is a bottleneck in these tests. This bears out by the higher degree of improvement seen from the Il2:FB benchmark.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    You can see the results and graphs here: http://forums.ubi.com/eve/forums?a=t...06&m=536109981
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  10. #10
    Weatherman- Nice info on the link- Looks as if your right- Lockon is more gfx card dependant vs cpu/ram/overclocking dependant...

    Thanks agn for the info...
    AMD Athlon 64-bit 3400+ 1600mhz HyperTransport |K8V mobo | 1 Gig Kingston DDR 3200 | ATI X800 Pro | cats 4.7 beta |X45 | DX9.0b | 19 LCD ViewSonic | TrackIR2 | SoundTech ST8T AND Bose 100 Monitors
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •