RADEON X800 and 9800 PRO and Lomac CHARTS! | Forums

[Spikey3]

If already seen, please excuse-
Interesting charts and graphs here...


http://www.firingsquad.com/print_art...rticle_id=1478

Lomac is Down abot 3/4 the way. If you look close, they are comparing a 3200+ with a 9800 pro vs a 3400+ with a X800. Interesting info on there anyway.

[Spikey3]

If already seen, please excuse-
Interesting charts and graphs here...


http://www.firingsquad.com/print_art...rticle_id=1478

Lomac is Down abot 3/4 the way. If you look close, they are comparing a 3200+ with a 9800 pro vs a 3400+ with a X800. Interesting info on there anyway.

[olaleier]

Whoa, check that scaling:



X800 Pro is definately a great card for Lomac.

==================================

==================================
Marvin in hyperlobby

[dmpr]

That shows how the graphic card was the limiting factor and by using the X800 the processor is the limiting factor.

[olaleier]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by dmpr:
That shows how the graphic card was the limiting factor and by using the X800 the processor is the limiting factor.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Really?

What I meant to show was how the X800 Pro scales between the different CPUs...an XP 2100 gets better frames than the 3400 with a 9800XT, on 1600x1200, no AA.

The 9800XT pegs at 1280x1024, while the X800 Pro still scales at 1600x1200 - 4xAA. Awesome!

(Only slightly though...imagine upgrading from a XP2100 to a 3400+ and getting a 5fps increase )

==================================

==================================
Marvin in hyperlobby

[shibumi77]

And where are the P4 charts?

HOMEGROWN
System Spec's:
Windows XP SP1,
2.8 GHz Intel P4B@3.1 GHz,
Aopen AX4B-533 Tube MB,
Telefunken 6922 Tube,
1024Mb PC2700,
5xWD 80Gb. SE drives(4xRAID-0)
Promise TX2000 IDE RAID card,
Plextor 708A DVD-RW
SIIG 1394 card,
Netgear Giga-NIC,
ATI Radeon 9600 Pro 128Mb
Omega Radeon Drivers,
Logitech Freedom Cordless 2.4 Joystick
MS Cordless KB\Mouse
Antec Sonata case.
Viewsonic PF790 CRT
"The only thing you're ruler of is Jack and Sh*t, and Jack left the building"

[TDBONE1]

http://forums.ubi.com/eve/forums?a=t...6044#992106044

read my post (almost at bottom)

i had clearly staed it had to be the graphics processor as limiting factor


yesterdays news...

link to my ftp server
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-aviationlover

msi k7t266 pro ru-2 (ver2.0 6380)
xp1800+
768ddc pc2100
ait 9800xt
sb live gamer 5.1
lne 100tx
logitech 2.4ghz cordless
ms optical mouse
generic keyboard

[olaleier]

TDBONE1, the "CPU-limited or GPU-limited" determination doesn't apply to software with such dynamic loads as flight sims.

You can bring a x800 Pro/3400+ setup to its knees with gfx on low, flying over water but with 1000 SAM units in the mission.

Firingsquad usually use the MiG-29 Intercept track with GFX options on High (the High-preset button), a very graphically intensive track and setup (overcast + water on high) while there's a low unit-count.

==================================

==================================
Marvin in hyperlobby

[Weather_Man]

I agree. It's highly GPU dependent. I concluded in my Ram Review, Feb 7, 2004:

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Well, these tests were enlightening on several fronts. First, CPU overclocking and faster RAM does not affect FPS that much in Lockon. I can only conclude from this that at these CPU speeds, other factors are more important in increasing the framerate. I believe this game is actually more video card dependent than CPU, and that my FX5900 is a bottleneck in these tests. This bears out by the higher degree of improvement seen from the Il2:FB benchmark.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

You can see the results and graphs here: http://forums.ubi.com/eve/forums?a=t...06&m=536109981

[Spikey3]

Weatherman- Nice info on the link- Looks as if your right- Lockon is more gfx card dependant vs cpu/ram/overclocking dependant...

Thanks agn for the info...