Guys, I bought the game about 5 days agfo and tried to play it. First of all it would ot install 6 times on my PC screaming that my GeForce 9800GTX is not supported
secondly when I finaly managed to install and start the bastard I was realy disapointed. The game I'v been waiting for almost 2 years turned out to be a dumb, ugly and arcadish as hell. I don't know about console players but seeing those horrible textures on max settings give m the creeps. It's 2009 and the PC version's graphics look wurse than in Earth 2160

Also I find the game to be very very arcadish. There just isn't no strategy. All tank battles are pathetic - the winner is always the guy who either started fireing first or has superios numbers no flanking, no smoke screens

Your squad will die much faster if it is shot by hostile squad either than by hostile tanks, ground deformation is bad, no free camera for PC also makes me feel kinda dumb.

About voice commands. Russian versions of it are still not available ( i had to speak English in Russian version of the game ) and they were often bugge. Very often units would react to command "UNIT!" from 3rd or 4th try, ususaly they would just ignore me or say "cannot be done" WT?!
-Unit-3...
-Cannot be done


So..in conclusion I really must say that I'm sorry I spend my money on this. If I had a console I played it, but since I'm a PC gamer and this game on the PC seems to me as an epic fail - I will return back to World in COnflict.

P.S> I'm not gonna leave the forums, I'll just ingore my game, nothing more, just as before PC version was released

should have gotten soviet assault. im probably getting it depending on how much it costs. right now i moved on to Empire total war and its fun as hell. its about as buggy as endwar sometimes but they released 2 patches in the first week of release and are coming out with another one next week. they are going for weekly patches. ubi could learn a few lessons from Sega and CA.

Why are you posting this in the console section...

Console graphics look really goob actually.

And about the strategy thing it doesn't seem like you have any tactics. Try getting good at a game before passing judgement. Maybe you should attack enemy tanks with gunships OMG duh ... but oh NOZ then they gonna die from the transports, well them hit the transports with EW or artillery first der. Also flanking does help as units take more damage when hit in the sides or rear. Man I wonder what all thats called... strategy and/or tactics maybe?

Free camera movement would take away a good part of the game which is scouting for enemies. The best thing about the UVA and gunships

Also why would a 20 man riflemen squad, who can spead out, die faster to 4 slow moving, slow firing tanks than 20 men with fully automatic weapons shooting and running at them close range?

Try getting past noob status before embarrass yourself again. YOU FAIL!

To the OP, I think you should play it a little longer. It's definitely not an arcade style strategy game, it's very strategic but very different from any RTS you would have played before.

I can't argue about the graphics, but they don't bother me at all. The camera is brilliant, only being able to see from the POV of your troops is an excellent idea, give it a chance and you'll see how much it adds to the game.

There's no way this game is about who fired first, it's about mobility, vision and using the right tools for the job.

quote:

Originally posted by Gregolution:
To the OP, I think you should play it a little longer. It's definitely not an arcade style strategy game, it's very strategic but very different from any RTS you would have played before.

I can't argue about the graphics, but they don't bother me at all. The camera is brilliant, only being able to see from the POV of your troops is an excellent idea, give it a chance and you'll see how much it adds to the game.

There's no way this game is about who fired first, it's about mobility, vision and using the right tools for the job.

actualy the OP is right it is based off of who shoots first. if you just sit there in a shoot out that it. in any game with HP for units that are more or less identical to each other, in a strait up shoot out the one whom fires first wins.

quote:

Originally posted by deamonomic:

quote:

Originally posted by Gregolution:
To the OP, I think you should play it a little longer. It's definitely not an arcade style strategy game, it's very strategic but very different from any RTS you would have played before.

I can't argue about the graphics, but they don't bother me at all. The camera is brilliant, only being able to see from the POV of your troops is an excellent idea, give it a chance and you'll see how much it adds to the game.

There's no way this game is about who fired first, it's about mobility, vision and using the right tools for the job.

actualy the OP is right it is based off of who shoots first. if you just sit there in a shoot out that it. in any game with HP for units that are more or less identical to each other, in a strait up shoot out the one whom fires first wins.

but if you was any good in the first place you would have you command chain in place before running around the map with just tanks and withdraw your unit closer to a unit which can deal with the hostile

quote:

Originally posted by speersy26:

quote:

Originally posted by deamonomic:

quote:

Originally posted by Gregolution:
To the OP, I think you should play it a little longer. It's definitely not an arcade style strategy game, it's very strategic but very different from any RTS you would have played before.

I can't argue about the graphics, but they don't bother me at all. The camera is brilliant, only being able to see from the POV of your troops is an excellent idea, give it a chance and you'll see how much it adds to the game.

There's no way this game is about who fired first, it's about mobility, vision and using the right tools for the job.

actualy the OP is right it is based off of who shoots first. if you just sit there in a shoot out that it. in any game with HP for units that are more or less identical to each other, in a strait up shoot out the one whom fires first wins.

but if you was any good in the first place you would have you command chain in place before running around the map with just tanks and withdraw your unit closer to a unit which can deal with the hostile

Exactly. Hence it's not about who shoots first at all. If you sum the game up as who shoots first, you've missed the point which is what I was trying to say.

quote:

Originally posted by Artacool:
Why are you posting this in the console section...

Console graphics look really goob actually.

And about the strategy thing it doesn't seem like you have any tactics. Try getting good at a game before passing judgement. Maybe you should attack enemy tanks with gunships OMG duh ... but oh NOZ then they gonna die from the transports, well them hit the transports with EW or artillery first der. Also flanking does help as units take more damage when hit in the sides or rear. Man I wonder what all thats called... strategy and/or tactics maybe?

Free camera movement would take away a good part of the game which is scouting for enemies. The best thing about the UVA and gunships

Also why would a 20 man riflemen squad, who can spead out, die faster to 4 slow moving, slow firing tanks than 20 men with fully automatic weapons shooting and running at them close range?

Try getting past noob status before embarrass yourself again. YOU FAIL!

your talking about a whole other game that was never released. units take the same damgae no matter where you shoot them. they dumbed the game down for all the retards and destroyed it in the process.

quote:

Originally posted by Tolarius2007:
should have gotten soviet assault. im probably getting it depending on how much it costs. right now i moved on to Empire total war and its fun as hell. its about as buggy as endwar sometimes but they released 2 patches in the first week of release and are coming out with another one next week. they are going for weekly patches. ubi could learn a few lessons from Sega and CA.

My m8 got Empire total war and we where playing it earlier. Tbh I prefer MTW and RTW 2 ETW. The AI on it is terrible and is very very buggy 95% of the time.

I wouldn't get it for PC since there are so many other RTS games that are better than EndWar that's why i bought it for PS3, but soon C&C 3 will be out too but EndWar still has features other games don't, so i'll find myself crawling back to EndWar.

EndWar has a great design its just the implementation that's a problem

Its a shame..i know i bought this too...the devs never put any effort into this...stripped it of anything special...it was delayed so many times they should have given us something!!

quote:

Originally posted by Artacool:
Why are you posting this in the console section...

Console graphics look really goob actually.

And about the strategy thing it doesn't seem like you have any tactics. Try getting good at a game before passing judgement. Maybe you should attack enemy tanks with gunships OMG duh ... but oh NOZ then they gonna die from the transports, well them hit the transports with EW or artillery first der. Also flanking does help as units take more damage when hit in the sides or rear. Man I wonder what all thats called... strategy and/or tactics maybe?

Free camera movement would take away a good part of the game which is scouting for enemies. The best thing about the UVA and gunships

Also why would a 20 man riflemen squad, who can spead out, die faster to 4 slow moving, slow firing tanks than 20 men with fully automatic weapons shooting and running at them close range?

Try getting past noob status before embarrass yourself again. YOU FAIL!

Do not call him a noob..Sky has been here since before the begining of the console version..so dont talk to him like that...

tank vs tank is only then equal when EUR vs EUR woud fight.

as an EUR u die pretty quick against RUS tanks even when u have first strike.

and wayne graphic as long the game is good. finaly a game who isnt an rush game.

Wow, you waited all of this time for this?
Talk about disappointment.

At least you might have Hawx too look forward to.