ubi.com    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  End War  Hop To Forums  End War General Discussion- Console    The ATACMS and Muttbut tech geek thread...we need Russian's
Page 1 ... 207 208 209 210 211 212 

Moderators: aznpwnerp, Vth_F_Smith_
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Picture of superkrait
Posted Hide Post
How come the UK got pwned so hard by the gfc compared to everyone else?
 
Posts: 485 | Registered: Thu September 04 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Admittedly i'm a novice when it comes to economics, but from what i've gathered we've had to bail out the financial sector, which is the cornerstone of our economy with money we don't have. You might remeber a while back (i dunno if it made international news) but we where warned by the IMF that if we didn't start paying some of what we loaned back or continued to lend the amount of money we'd been upto that point we'd lose our AAA rating.
Right now we're selling off state assets and looking for efficency savings where ever we can.


________________________
-----Sig removed due to inappropriate content-----
 
Posts: 622 | Registered: Thu December 18 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of muttbut
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by superkrait:
It is pretty cool. I dont think its brand new though, but i only just found the pics.

Poor brits, seems they lost an aircraft carrier to the accountants... HMS Prince of Wales will now carry helos instead of F35s, like HMS Ocean. Not enough money for the fighter complement, but too late to back out of the ship's construction.

No, the article is poorly worded, they will get the 2 carriers, but one at any given time will carry helos ect while the other will carry the jet's/ What they are apparently going to do is cut back the intial amount of F-35's they were going to buy. Not a great burden IMHO, they never had the air&ground crew for the 150 they planned to get at the start.


 
Posts: 490 | Registered: Fri June 08 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of muttbut
Posted Hide Post
quote:
14:06 GMT, October 21, 2009 Kockums’ Piraya project has recently attracted attention in the media. The Project has also been highlighted in conjunction with a conference on naval security, attended by some one hundred experts from all over the country.

“This in-house development project aims to study ways in which many Unmanned Surface Vessels can be managed simultaneously,” states Project Manager Jens-Olof Lindh. “To do this, you need some USVs that you can use for trial purposes. For this reason, we have worked on developing both USVs and software during 2008 and 2009, to enable us to conduct these tests. The fourth Piraya vessel was completed and became operational at the end of September. Kockums now has four USVs that can be deployed for testing and trials, such as with communications and control systems.”

The seminar on the Piraya project attracted keen interest, a project in which many have already previously expressed interest. The Swedish Navy and representatives from civil port authorities wish to be updated on how this type of vessel might be used for surveillance and security applications. The Piraya USV can operate independently or in conjunction with other land-based or seaborne systems.

“We recently operated three vessels with the same control system,” states Jens-Olof Lindh. “As well as technical trials, we’re developing methods for handling a range of functions, such as vessel preparation, transfer between the team and tactical management and surveillance of the marine sector in which we operate, to secure marine safety.”

A feature article in Swedish technology journal Ny Teknik headlined the project in the following terms: “Kockums’ unmanned miniature vessels are a smuggler’s nightmare.” The article noted that Kockums has been quietly engaged in developing brand new technology for the control of unmanned vessels over the past two years, adding that the Piraya project’s four prototypes can be controlled as a small and partially automated fleet by a single operator.





Imagine a swarm of these armed with light ASM's roaming around....nice. Big Grin


 
Posts: 490 | Registered: Fri June 08 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of superkrait
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by muttbut:
quote:
Originally posted by superkrait:
It is pretty cool. I dont think its brand new though, but i only just found the pics.

Poor brits, seems they lost an aircraft carrier to the accountants... HMS Prince of Wales will now carry helos instead of F35s, like HMS Ocean. Not enough money for the fighter complement, but too late to back out of the ship's construction.

No, the article is poorly worded, they will get the 2 carriers, but one at any given time will carry helos ect while the other will carry the jet's/ What they are apparently going to do is cut back the intial amount of F-35's they were going to buy. Not a great burden IMHO, they never had the air&ground crew for the 150 they planned to get at the start.

I worded it badly myself - I know they'll keep the ship but i wont call it a carrier until it carries fixed-wing - actually it might carry awacs, i dont know. But are you saying they might just swap the air group over? I'm not sure 50 frames will be enough to sustain permanent operation - hence the talk about 'borrowing from france.'

This makes me wonder if they might try to sell it to the french at some point, if France is still after a second carrier and willing to go with conventional power. France could sell them a mistral to cover it as a commando ship.
 
Posts: 485 | Registered: Thu September 04 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
^^Can't wait to read the papers when/if that's announced Veryhappy


________________________
-----Sig removed due to inappropriate content-----
 
Posts: 622 | Registered: Thu December 18 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of atacms
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by superkrait:
Some wierd camo system the australian army put on its M1A1s called barracuda...



The Barracuda camo system is made by Saab and is quite impressive. Saab is arguably the world's leader in camo netting (very high tech). bow

Apparently the danish are using a variation on their leopards in afghanistan, keeps the heat down.



----In your application of military force, be just, fair, precise, but to conquer your enemies' will, heart and mind, seek to improve his lot- atacms-----
 
Posts: 2626 | Registered: Sat January 06 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BakyardShniper:
quote:
Originally posted by Mig-29:
M247 Sergeant York.

Failed Mobile AA project in the 70s/80s
Developed By ford aerospace.
Based on m48 chassis.
It was suppose to incorporate some sort of advanced tracking system or something.

What exactly was wrong with this project?



The Sgt. York DIVAD had radar problems(used a modifiedwestinghouse from early F-16's IIRC) as the radar had trouble separating ground clutter from actual targets,turret traverse wasn't fast enough and the system was very sensitive to even simple ECCM(counter counter measures)

A cause of the poor turret traverse, the 20 ton turret also bogged down the old patton hulls it was mounted on as well, so it couldn't keep pace with the Abrams and the Bradley.


Poor development,(it couldn't really compare to the Gepard, which was only a few years older)and use of a lot of off the shelve product and the fact that it was pressed into development right at the dawn of missile based systems, made that it was a bit of a problem child, and was subsequently cancelled in favour of other systems, the majority of them missile based(though the VADS was apparently a succesful gun system)


Its odd why they chose an M48 chassis. I'm guessing the large availability. Still its a cool vehicle. I'm probably going to Buy An Academy Minicraft model of this soon.



XBLSquadrons.com
In Soviet Russia, Model Kits build you.
 
Posts: 2110 | Registered: Mon June 02 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of superkrait
Posted Hide Post
unmanned f35 concept:



I like it.
 
Posts: 485 | Registered: Thu September 04 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of BTR74
Posted Hide Post
When was this proposed?
 
Posts: 4740 | Registered: Tue January 15 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of superkrait
Posted Hide Post
August. Skunk works are looking at it, but it won't go anywhere till the f35 is fully operational.
 
Posts: 485 | Registered: Thu September 04 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of MrRandom004
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by superkrait:



There's sexy, there's uber sexy, then there's this


--------------------------------------------------------------
Gordon Brown has not only reached the point where everything he does goes wrong but people no longer hate him they simply feel pity. I know at this stage because i was there. - John Major 2009
 
Posts: 1773 | Registered: Mon July 21 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of BTR74
Posted Hide Post
It seems that even though full production has been delayed to 2016, the F35 will still reach Initial Operating Capacity for the Marines in 2012.
 
Posts: 4740 | Registered: Tue January 15 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of superkrait
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MrRandom004:
There's sexy, there's uber sexy, then there's this

It is, but the best thing is the cockpit area can be replaced with extra sensors or enlarged fuel tank, so it would be even better than the manned version, without costing extra Veryhappy. Not sure if a manned version could be converted, i think theyve been experimenting turning f16s into drones so it should be possible.


While we're on the f35, heres two interesting videos from northrop grumman showing the combat capabilities of some onboard systems. Definitely worth a watch in my opinion, scary stuff if youre not buying any Tongue

Distributed aperture system EO DAS
APG-81 AESA


Oh, and further on Thales' hawkei vehicle, a quick pic of the first mock-up next to a bushmaster for comparison.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: superkrait,
 
Posts: 485 | Registered: Thu September 04 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Inquisitor_Zeal
Posted Hide Post
Do they really already have missiles that can turn around 180 degrees right off the launch (and that quickly)like they showed them doing in the videos?

But the videos were interesting to watch. And wow that unmanned JSF actually looks really good! I think its the fact that the cockpit is gone/ the nose cone is completely different that makes me actually like the design.


 
Posts: 2179 | Registered: Wed January 31 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of BTR74
Posted Hide Post
I can see how DAS compensates for the F-35's lower maneuverability than the Raptor. Good job, Northdrop Grumman!
 
Posts: 4740 | Registered: Tue January 15 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of superkrait
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Inquisitor_Zeal:
Do they really already have missiles that can turn around 180 degrees right off the launch (and that quickly)like they showed them doing in the videos?

An RAAF hornet has fired an ASRAAM 180 degrees in an exercise, the target being cued by the shooter's wingman. Probably been done by a few air forces. But that was testing the lock-after-launch capabilities, not the missile's manoeuvrability so the target was 5km behind, no test for the turning circle.

In any case, they were arguing this exact thing where i found the video. Personally im inclined to believe the aim-9x can turn that quickly, due to its thrust vectoring. Probably israel's python-5 as well (though not as sharply), which has a bucketload of control surfaces.
 
Posts: 485 | Registered: Thu September 04 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Inquisitor_Zeal
Posted Hide Post
Huh thats pretty interesting. Its pretty scary that people dont even need to see the aircraft they are firing at anymore... We've come so far over then past 60 years in flight... from having mad dog fights where pilots actually needed skill to hit their targets, to being able to hit targets behind you...


 
Posts: 2179 | Registered: Wed January 31 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
The Latest Air Force Magazine has an article in it about a 6th Gen. fighter. It gives a list of the generation types and says that a Potential Generation 6 Fighter will have: extreme stealth; efficient in all flight regimes (subsonic to Multi Mach); possible "morphing" capability; smart skins; highly networked; extremely sensitive sensors; optionally manned; and directed energy weapons - for both offence and countermeasures (ex: a laser that shoots down incoming missiles) the article said that DEWs would first be integrated as defensive weapons before moving on to offensive ones.Unfortunetly the article also says that despite the Air Force having a large "classified" budget (larger than any other service) that there is currently no plans for a 6th Generation fighter and that little to no thinking had been done about the subject until Boeing had brought up its proposal a few months ago - this is all B/c Gates has been hacking fighter programs.) It also talks about how it took 20 years to develop the F-22 and that by 2020 Russia, China, India, and Europe will also have 5th Generation fighters as capable, if not more so, than the F-22 and that they all realize that to win wars you need ariel supremecy and that if the US doesn't go 6th Gen by 2020 we're going to be left behind in the arms race (in terms of fighters.)
 
Posts: 322 | Registered: Tue June 10 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of BTR74
Posted Hide Post
I say that's a tad bit exagerrated. India, Russia, and China having F-22 equal fighters will take a long time, probably more 2030 than 2020
 
Posts: 4740 | Registered: Tue January 15 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community Page 1 ... 207 208 209 210 211 212  
 

ubi.com    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  End War  Hop To Forums  End War General Discussion- Console    The ATACMS and Muttbut tech geek thread...we need Russian's

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy