
Forums
End War
End War General Discussion- Console
The ATACMS and Muttbut tech geek thread...we need Russian's|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
|
|
How come the UK got pwned so hard by the gfc compared to everyone else?
|
|||
|
Admittedly i'm a novice when it comes to economics, but from what i've gathered we've had to bail out the financial sector, which is the cornerstone of our economy with money we don't have. You might remeber a while back (i dunno if it made international news) but we where warned by the IMF that if we didn't start paying some of what we loaned back or continued to lend the amount of money we'd been upto that point we'd lose our AAA rating.
Right now we're selling off state assets and looking for efficency savings where ever we can. ________________________ -----Sig removed due to inappropriate content----- |
||||
|
![]() |
No, the article is poorly worded, they will get the 2 carriers, but one at any given time will carry helos ect while the other will carry the jet's/ What they are apparently going to do is cut back the intial amount of F-35's they were going to buy. Not a great burden IMHO, they never had the air&ground crew for the 150 they planned to get at the start. |
|||
|
![]() |
Imagine a swarm of these armed with light ASM's roaming around....nice. |
|||
|
|
|
I worded it badly myself - I know they'll keep the ship but i wont call it a carrier until it carries fixed-wing - actually it might carry awacs, i dont know. But are you saying they might just swap the air group over? I'm not sure 50 frames will be enough to sustain permanent operation - hence the talk about 'borrowing from france.' This makes me wonder if they might try to sell it to the french at some point, if France is still after a second carrier and willing to go with conventional power. France could sell them a mistral to cover it as a commando ship. |
|||
|
^^Can't wait to read the papers when/if that's announced
________________________ -----Sig removed due to inappropriate content----- |
||||
|
![]() |
----In your application of military force, be just, fair, precise, but to conquer your enemies' will, heart and mind, seek to improve his lot- atacms----- |
|||
|
Its odd why they chose an M48 chassis. I'm guessing the large availability. Still its a cool vehicle. I'm probably going to Buy An Academy Minicraft model of this soon. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
![]() |
When was this proposed?
|
|||
|
|
|
August. Skunk works are looking at it, but it won't go anywhere till the f35 is fully operational.
|
|||
|
![]() |
There's sexy, there's uber sexy, then there's this -------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Brown has not only reached the point where everything he does goes wrong but people no longer hate him they simply feel pity. I know at this stage because i was there. - John Major 2009 |
|||
|
![]() |
It seems that even though full production has been delayed to 2016, the F35 will still reach Initial Operating Capacity for the Marines in 2012.
|
|||
|
|
|
It is, but the best thing is the cockpit area can be replaced with extra sensors or enlarged fuel tank, so it would be even better than the manned version, without costing extra While we're on the f35, heres two interesting videos from northrop grumman showing the combat capabilities of some onboard systems. Definitely worth a watch in my opinion, scary stuff if youre not buying any Distributed aperture system EO DAS APG-81 AESA Oh, and further on Thales' hawkei vehicle, a quick pic of the first mock-up next to a bushmaster for comparison. This message has been edited. Last edited by: superkrait, |
|||
|
![]() |
Do they really already have missiles that can turn around 180 degrees right off the launch (and that quickly)like they showed them doing in the videos?
But the videos were interesting to watch. And wow that unmanned JSF actually looks really good! I think its the fact that the cockpit is gone/ the nose cone is completely different that makes me actually like the design. |
|||
|
![]() |
I can see how DAS compensates for the F-35's lower maneuverability than the Raptor. Good job, Northdrop Grumman!
|
|||
|
|
|
An RAAF hornet has fired an ASRAAM 180 degrees in an exercise, the target being cued by the shooter's wingman. Probably been done by a few air forces. But that was testing the lock-after-launch capabilities, not the missile's manoeuvrability so the target was 5km behind, no test for the turning circle. In any case, they were arguing this exact thing where i found the video. Personally im inclined to believe the aim-9x can turn that quickly, due to its thrust vectoring. Probably israel's python-5 as well (though not as sharply), which has a bucketload of control surfaces. |
|||
|
![]() |
Huh thats pretty interesting. Its pretty scary that people dont even need to see the aircraft they are firing at anymore... We've come so far over then past 60 years in flight... from having mad dog fights where pilots actually needed skill to hit their targets, to being able to hit targets behind you...
|
|||
|
The Latest Air Force Magazine has an article in it about a 6th Gen. fighter. It gives a list of the generation types and says that a Potential Generation 6 Fighter will have: extreme stealth; efficient in all flight regimes (subsonic to Multi Mach); possible "morphing" capability; smart skins; highly networked; extremely sensitive sensors; optionally manned; and directed energy weapons - for both offence and countermeasures (ex: a laser that shoots down incoming missiles) the article said that DEWs would first be integrated as defensive weapons before moving on to offensive ones.Unfortunetly the article also says that despite the Air Force having a large "classified" budget (larger than any other service) that there is currently no plans for a 6th Generation fighter and that little to no thinking had been done about the subject until Boeing had brought up its proposal a few months ago - this is all B/c Gates has been hacking fighter programs.) It also talks about how it took 20 years to develop the F-22 and that by 2020 Russia, China, India, and Europe will also have 5th Generation fighters as capable, if not more so, than the F-22 and that they all realize that to win wars you need ariel supremecy and that if the US doesn't go 6th Gen by 2020 we're going to be left behind in the arms race (in terms of fighters.)
|
||||
|
![]() |
I say that's a tad bit exagerrated. India, Russia, and China having F-22 equal fighters will take a long time, probably more 2030 than 2020
|
|||
|
| Powered by Eve Community | Page 1 ... 207 208 209 210 211 212 |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
Forums
End War
End War General Discussion- Console
The ATACMS and Muttbut tech geek thread...we need Russian's
