
|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
NEW MISSION SUPPORT IDEA
Possible Names: NAVAL STRIKE or NAVAL SUPPORT Availability: Coastal map On the current Endwar title attacking factions on coastal maps only have access to Electronic Warfare. This new Mission Support would hopefully make for more even gameplay on this type of map. LEVEL 1: You battlegroup is granted access use of two Navy ships. When the Naval Strike is ordered the ships guns fire a salvo at the designated target. This costs 4cp LEVEL 2: Stronger signal confidence grants your battlegroup access to three Navy ships. Now you can order more powerful salvo attacks on hostile units. This costs 5cp LEVEL 3: Signal confidence is now so strong that a Navy Aircraft Carrier has been assigned to your battlegroup. You can now scramble Navy aircraft to attack hostiles at a cost of 6cp NOTE: Level 3 Naval Strike on all factions has the same affect as a Level 3 Air Strike. Naval Strike is only avalible on coastal maps. Naval Strike can't be used against Gunships. Each Factions Naval Strike characteristics: JSF: U.S Navy Destroyers fire Smart shells which can readjust their trajectory after it is fired. This helps the shells find and hit their targets even if enemy units are in transit. If the hostile target is an Infantry unit the shell detonates just before impact sending large amount of fragments into the target (Level 1-2) EFEC: European Navy Frigates use high volocity Electromagnetic Naval Artillery. European Navy Electromagnetic shells are fast and can reach targets much faster then any other factions. (Level 1-2) For more info check youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OqlTXwLG40 Spatnaz: Russian Navy Battleships fire 18 inch Naval guns. Russian Navy guns are the most powerful of all the factions. (Level 1-2) |
|||
|
I agree with the concept, exept for one thing: level 3. On coastal maps a naval battlegroup should have give you a naval and funtion as an airbase.
|
||||
|
I like the idea and appreciate the hard work / research that you put into creating an accurate weapon.
DOBERMAN01 Russia "The world will know that free men stood against a tyrant, that few stood against many, and before this battle is over, even a god-king can bleed." <a href="http://s559.photobucket.com/albums/ss37/Doberman1/?action=view¤t=SOAREAPER-1-1-1.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i559.photobucket.com/albums/ss37/Doberman1/SOAREAPER-1-1-1.jpg" border="0" alt="PS3 Sig"></a> |
||||
|
![]() |
Deleted my post because i think i let the paranoia out a little early but i have my eye on you DOBERMAN01.
|
|||
|
![]() |
http://www.hasthelargehadronco...oyedtheworldyet.com/
"it had run its course, gone off course, rolled down a cliff, hit a cow, and then exploded." |
|||
|
Hahaha, that was a funny post Temp. What system do you play on and what faction? DOBERMAN01 - PS3 Russia "The world will know that free men stood against a tyrant, that few stood against many, and before this battle is over, even a god-king can bleed." <a href="http://s559.photobucket.com/albums/ss37/Doberman1/?action=view¤t=SOAREAPER-1-1-1.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i559.photobucket.com/albums/ss37/Doberman1/SOAREAPER-1-1-1.jpg" border="0" alt="PS3 Sig"></a> |
||||
|
![]() |
Use to be a Russian on the 360. This message has been edited. Last edited by: Templar11709, |
|||
|
![]() |
Shush....Your stupid.
1. America would use missiles. 2. The Railgun IS American technology. 3. The shells AREN'T Electromagnetic (thats how they are fired) 4. Way to take Russias navy back to WW2. Fail Thread. Thats why we voted NO. |
|||
|
![]() |
uh, here's my idea for the factions:
JSF gets railguns EEC gets smart missile Russia gets mass rocket attack |
|||
|
Sounds good and it's Nice too hear alternatives. I still perfer mine but would probably enjoy your suggestion any Naval off map support is welcome. Thanks for posting |
||||
|
![]() |
------------------------------ RIP xxxleninxxx XBL GT: unchained ak47 "Rule number one: you're no good to me dead. Rule two:... ah, what difference does it make? You'll probably all end up dead anyway." -Sgt. Frank McCullen, COD3 |
|||
|
![]() |
For me that's only slightly paranoid. You should have seen my original post, it was about a conspiracy theory that Benito was his Alt. Yes my mind somehow made a full blown conspiracy theory after only two posts, ain't my mind wonderful.
|
|||
|
![]() |
i agree with that theory, actually
------------------------------ RIP xxxleninxxx XBL GT: unchained ak47 "Rule number one: you're no good to me dead. Rule two:... ah, what difference does it make? You'll probably all end up dead anyway." -Sgt. Frank McCullen, COD3 |
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
getting? lol they are already dumb haha. "Aim Small, Miss Small" quoted from The Patriot |
|||
|
How about Naval Superiority?
|
||||
|
![]() |
All I can say is watch The Truman Show. If your paranoid as hell it messes with your head for weeks http://www.hasthelargehadronco...oyedtheworldyet.com/
"it had run its course, gone off course, rolled down a cliff, hit a cow, and then exploded." |
|||
|
![]() |
Here's the original, just remember that i thought it was a little over the top for 2 posts.
You know this post makes me seriously start thinking that Benito is an alternate of yours. It seems a little to much praise for something the same as every other navel strike idea. There's been a fair few navels strike threads which are pretty much exactly the same and the weapon choice isn't any thing special, all of the tech has been mentioned in the tech thread at least once (the railgun multiple times I'm pretty sure, i think patriot brought it up last). and imagine that, i look at your posts and i see that your last post before you praised Benitos ideas in two different threads was in April, and 4 months later (and shortly after Benito has the heat turned on him by a mod) you come back and immediately start praising him in a way that reminds me of him, could be my paranoia but that's a little suspicious. |
|||
|
![]() |
------------------------------ RIP xxxleninxxx XBL GT: unchained ak47 "Rule number one: you're no good to me dead. Rule two:... ah, what difference does it make? You'll probably all end up dead anyway." -Sgt. Frank McCullen, COD3 |
|||
|
I think this should be added in the new one. With naval battles.
All Posts Refer To 360, Spetznatz PLAYER , Endwar Pro, Endwar Forum Vet, Endwar Beta Tester (First and Second Beta) We are no longer under NDA (for a while) but woo Treasurer of Cookies in Hawxistan http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...543870&id=1334760329 |
||||
|
| Powered by Eve Community | Page 1 2 |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|

