Ubisoft is a great company, that did not ripoff any game. If you're saying that Splinter Cell copied Metal Gear Solid because MGS is a stealth game, and so is SC, then you must be a pretty sad man. Why don't you also jump back in and say that Hitman was also copied by SC?
Seriously, who cares?
As well, you probably won't get very many useful replies in this forum though - It's almost as dead as GR (Even the RvS OT is more active than this forum)
Maybe people who care would bother to vote if the poll were posted in a forum where people actually do care. I know this is the off-topic page, but I'm with Panda, very few here will really give a hoot. I suggest trying a MG or SC forum.
OMG both those games you listed were made buy other companies. RSE made the R6 series before they got bought by Ubi. (Though Ubi made Black Thorn and RVS and it shows). Far Cry was made by Crytek and published by Ubi. Instincts I believe was made by Ubi, and the expansion pack for Far Cry will be made by Ubi, if Iam not mistaken.
Where Life had no meaning, death sometimes, had it's price. That is why the Bounty Hunters appeared.
Metal Gear Solid is a classic, pure genious. True gamers love it. But Splinter Cell and MGS are very different. You can't compare them, they aren't meant to feel the same way. Metal Gear Solid's have the incredible stories(and it's made from Kojima who is a genious), and awesome action. Splinter Cell....not so much. But really, I think MGS is a more enjoyable series(especially MGS 3, it's unbelievable!). But Splinter Cell is not meant to be like MGS, it's totally different. It's about stealth, yeah, but not in the same way. And I suggest not goin to a specific Splinter Cell/MGS forum, because it will be too bias. Go to a forum like GameFaqs, or Gamespot. Since they are just overall videogame sites. And since this site is mostly UBIsoft fans, it is also going to be bias. Think about it.
You are such an idiot. You have to remember that MGS and SC are set in totally different time frames. On SC, you're part of a SECRET secret agency that isn't even meant to exist! You can't just go bouncing around, killing everything! It's meant to be a covert operation, not a warzone. Any compromisation, and they have to pull you out or else the gov will have to deny everything like they do with area 51. In MGS, however, you just sneak around not for any major political players, but to avoid having to use your ammo and alert everyone. I know one guy who ran out of ammo for this game, and he had to sneak around, killing guards via stealth or else he was dead.
Man metal gear solid is awsome,story's are cool and what's the new thing on snake eater about those ape from ape escape that is a rippoff! And the new solid snake in mgs4 is older then let's say 65??!!
Originally posted by Contra_freak: I know i should be posting this in the splinter cell forum but this is where i was when i got the idea. I admit i hate splinter cell games with every part of my heart. Iknow that ubisoft put a lot of work into it and i respect them for that but the games, in my opinion the games suck. There is hardly any action. what is the point in sneaking around evrybody doing something completely pointless and sneaking again. One more thing, Splinter Cell is just ubi's answer to metal gear. Ubi has two kinds of games completely original or total ripoffs. Rainbow 6,Farcry great games. Cold Fear, Splinter Cell Ripoffs. Now the real point of this post was to here your opinion. Metal Gear or Splinter Cell. Metal gear is plenty of stealth and action. You can kill anybody that isnt on your team and very original. Metal Gear is full of exciting characters and an awesome stories. One other thing, it has awesome boss battles. Splinter Cell has one cool character, Sam Fisher and thats no one else. Hardly any action, and a story that puts you to sleep. Tell me what you think is better.
ahahha ,sorry dude,but i,with most other fan,over 13 milions in the wolrd,we love splinter cell and sam fisher with every part of my heart!!
i hate SC because of the stupid things they do in it like if you get to a certain point they sweep the area and if they find anybodys its game over its really annoying cause you have to go back and start again.
that aside they are completely different MGS is completly unbeleiveable but SC is all based on fact (apart from the storylines of course) like the guns and the fact the enemies realise that if a lights turned off they left on thats somethings up.
but seeing as ive never completed SC im going for metal gear it kicks a**e
