ubi.com    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Rainbow Six  Hop To Forums  Rainbow Six Off Topic    Al-Qaeda Claims Responsibility for Power Outtage
Page 1 2 3 4 

Moderators: GSG_9_Rage, Mr.Hanky2005
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
<Guest>
Posted
V3-Dev wrote:
- Well Wit, it's a shame we don't have more of these
- "pretty smart people" in our government. I mean the
- Republican controlled Congress and administration
- have repeatedly held up legislation (and continue to
- do so) that would have upgraded the power grid a
- real long time ago.


Why wasn't it passed during a Democratically held Congress? It's not like the problems with the North American electricity grids were just discovered in the past 10 years. More like over 40 years ago.



.Wit
Ubi Soft/RSE Forum Moderator
<embed src="http://www.tacticaladvantage.com/sigs/blue_sig2.swf" height="90" width="276" autostart="true">
ICQ: 11353520 :: 59154659


Message Edited on 08/20/03 11:51AM by Witness
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<Guest>
Posted
didn't they rule out terrorist cause, because had it been a terrorist cause...the secondary grid would've been hit as well, causing the blackout to last weeks instead of days...

dunno, just what i heard on the news...
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<Guest>
Posted
You are correct Wit. Questions have been raised about the state of our power grid going all the way back to the great Northeast blackout of 1965. Nevertheless, the most recent blackout did not occur under a Democratic controlled Congress.

Furthermore, the current Congress and administration were warned about the vulnerability to our power gird as late as last November, so to see them still holding up legislation for an upgrade in order to squeeze in all the special provisions for their energy buddies is very disturbing to say the least.

I mean the fact that they continue such behavior in the aftermath of the largest blackout in US history is totally confounding to many. Not to mention, one would think that post 9-11 our President and Congress would have given priority to such matters rather then allow special interests to prevent the passing of new legislation designed to tackle this problem.
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<Guest>
Posted
o220o wrote:
- didn't they rule out terrorist cause, because had it
- been a terrorist cause...the secondary grid would've
- been hit as well, causing the blackout to last weeks
- instead of days...

Maybe the terrorists don't know what they're doing... but they'll know for next time won't they





"The statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." - Mark Twain, 1917
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<Guest>
Posted
V3-Dev wrote:
- You are correct Wit. Questions have been raised
- about the state of our power grid going all the way
- back to the great Northeast blackout of 1965.
- Nevertheless, the most recent blackout did not occur
- under a Democratic controlled Congress.


*shurg*

Until ANY Congress actually DOES something about this, I think I'll just hold off pointing the finger at either political party and hold ALL in Congress responsible. Sound fair?



.Wit
Ubi Soft/RSE Forum Moderator
<embed src="http://www.tacticaladvantage.com/sigs/blue_sig2.swf" height="90" width="276" autostart="true">
ICQ: 11353520 :: 59154659
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<Guest>
Posted
Depends on who you ask I suppose. Nevertheless, at the moment there is no denying the fact that it is Republican majority that has been holding up legislation for the power grid upgrade.

I mean I could understand your argument if our worst fears did not become reality with the latest blackout, but since it is a foregone conclusion now don't you think our Republican legislators should put aside their special interests in order to get this bill passed?

After all, in a post 9-11 world this vulnerability should have been given priority and placed near the top of the list by our President as well as the leaders of Congress.
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<Guest>
Posted
Ah Wit: I was just going to make that same observation. EVERY time anything of importance comes to the floor- SOMEONE of one party or the other will hold up or stagnate legislation simply because they want some piece of pork included in it. EVERY member, regardless if it is the Senate or the House engages in this. It is unbelieveable that supposedly intelligent people would do this, simply because they don't get their way, or they hate the one that brought forth the idea.

Way too much power these people have and they are so far out of touch with reality , how can we ever expect them to make rational, intelligeant decisions?

They are so insulated from the rest of us, it is incredible to me that they ever accomplish anything of real importance.
Every once inawhile they screw up and do something right.

Party affiliations should go right out the window,at least here where we try to discuss topics with a modicom of reason.

I bet everyone here can name at least one member of the House or Senate that we truly believe is responsible and truthful.

If we added them all up we would discover, to our everlasting amazement, that EVERY one of them are sterling examples of sincere, honest, representatives of the people.
But, if we ask the same people which ones are dishonest and just plain corrupt, the numbers would be much higher.

We are almost as much to blame for the crap that goes on in Washington as they are, well perhaps that is a slight overstatement, but the point is, nevertheless, valid.

Just an observation:


Leep Out:

 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<Guest>
Posted
Leep wrote:

- EVERY time anything of importance comes to the floor
- SOMEONE of one party or the other will hold up or
- stagnate legislation simply because they want some piece
- of pork included in it.

Well, thank you for stating the obvious Leep. However, as in many other instances, when the inclusion of pork barrel provisions holds up legislation as imperative as this it always raises concerns from the public, and rightfully so. After all, we are not talking about some Senator attempting to get federal funding for some chicken farm in his or her home state. This is about a wide ranging vulnerability that adversely affects almost every aspect of life here in the states, so satisfying special interests is the last thing certain members of Congress should be doing.
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<Guest>
Posted
MisterNiceGuy wrote:
-
- ScrubberManFSJ wrote:
-- Why not blow up a damn and nock power out for good,
-- as well as kill lots with water flood.
--
--
--
-- Huh MR NICE GUY
--
--
-
- Good idea, I'll pass it on to Osama.
-
-
- Hmmmm....I wonder where were you the other day MNG?
Having a spot of Tea with Osama and giving him some tips?

....and try to sneak back, tippy-toe into the forum. ;





The beatings will stop when morale improves.
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<Guest>
Posted
V3-Dev wrote:
-
- After all, in a post 9-11 world this vulnerability
- should have been given priority and placed near the
- top of the list by our President as well as the
- leaders of Congress.

Yeah, but If the President would have come out and said we have to upgrade the power grid now,the Democrats would have had a field day. Probably saying thinks like "You have a post war problem and you are talking about power grids?"
"what really are you upto?"

I can see it now on the Front Page of The New York Times.


- BUSH IS MESSING WITH THE POWER

"Billions are needed for the Upgrade, our Troops are getting killed and Bush wants to waste money."

Let's be thankfull it wasnt much worse.


-






The beatings will stop when morale improves.

Message Edited on 08/20/03 02:39PM by Hornet57
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<Guest>
Posted
V3-Dev wrote:.
-
- I mean the fact that they continue such behavior in
- the aftermath of the largest blackout in US history
- is totally confounding to many. Not to mention, one
- would think that post 9-11 our President and
- Congress would have given priority to such matters
- rather then allow special interests to prevent the
- passing of new legislation designed to tackle this
- problem.

Ok V3 If you are going to use the post 9-11, priorities, what about other priorities. Funds are drying up and more might be needed as for Homeland security. Which priority is best?

And what happens when you pick the "wrong" priority?
Just blame the Republicans again?

Democrats just cant unite with common sense. Oh I almost forgot.........its election year!


-
-
-
-






The beatings will stop when morale improves.
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<Guest>
Posted
Hornet57 wrote:

- Yeah, but If the President would have come out and
- said we have to take upgrade the power grid the
- Democrats would have had a field day. Probably
- saying thinks like "You have a post war problem and
- you are talking about power grids?"

Actually, the President has already come forward since the blackout publicly stating the power grid needs upgrading, and the Democratic response has simply been that the administration and their friends in Congress drop all the special provisions in the bill in order to swiftly pass and implement the legislation.

Besides Hornet, tax breaks to various power companies and drilling in the artic wildlife refuge for petroleum is the last thing that is going to prevent possible future power outages, and the sooner certain individuals in our government come to this realization, the better it will be for us all here in North America.
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<Guest>
Posted
V3-Dev wrote:
- Hornet57 wrote:
-
-- Yeah, but If the President would have come out and
-- said we have to take upgrade the power grid the
-- Democrats would have had a field day. Probably
-- saying thinks like "You have a post war problem and
-- you are talking about power grids?"

Sorry my mistake I meant to write pre-blackout.
-
- Besides Hornet, tax breaks to various power
- companies and drilling in the artic wildlife refuge
- for petroleum is the last thing that is going to
- prevent possible future power outages, and the
- sooner certain individuals in our government come to
- this realization, the better it will be for us all
- here in North America.


In the mean time many complain that we are going to Iraq for their oil. You just cant win.
Yesturday I caught the end of this report about windmill farms offshore to generate power out and there are the rich and famous that think it will be too unsightly since they will be able to see it through their highpowered binoculars.
Maybe if we can hang a nice powder blue curtain could solve the problem.







The beatings will stop when morale improves.

Message Edited on 08/20/03 03:04PM by Hornet57
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<Guest>
Posted
V3, do you think a billion dollars a week would be enough to fix the power grid?




"The statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." - Mark Twain, 1917
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<Guest>
Posted
Hornet57 wrote:

- Ok V3 If you are going to use the post 9-11,
- priorities, what about other priorities. Funds are
- drying up and more might be needed as for Homeland
- security.

Last time I checked a vulnerable power grid would be of much concern to the Homeland Security department; hence it should have been a priority. Furthermore, if you want to talk about funds, let's talk about how the Republican version of the current energy bill would reap billions of dollars in tax breaks and royalty exemptions on federal lands for the fossil-fuel industry. Not to mention, billions in subsidized insurance and loan guarantees for the nuclear business. In the end, we require bill that stimulates economic growth and helps guarantee an affordable and consistent energy supply for Americans. What we don't need is a special-interest banquet that picks the pockets of taxpayers.
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<Guest>
Posted
Wow, some people just have an axe to grind, eh?



.Wit
Ubi Soft/RSE Forum Moderator
<embed src="http://www.tacticaladvantage.com/sigs/blue_sig2.swf" height="90" width="276" autostart="true">
ICQ: 11353520 :: 59154659
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<Guest>
Posted
V3-Dev wrote:
- Hornet57 wrote:
-
-- Ok V3 If you are going to use the post 9-11,
-- priorities, what about other priorities. Funds are
-- drying up and more might be needed as for Homeland
-- security.
-
- Last time I checked a vulnerable power grid would be
- of much concern to the Homeland Security department;
- hence it should have been a priority.

If only the President was as good a monday morning quaterback as you we would have no problems.


Furthermore,
- if you want to talk about funds, let's talk about
- how the Republican version of the current energy
- bill would reap billions of dollars in tax breaks
- and royalty exemptions on federal lands for the
- fossil-fuel industry.

What else would you use that land for V3, Free housing for the homeless?

Btw how many people does the fossil-fuel industry employee do you know?

Not to mention, billions in
- subsidized insurance and loan guarantees for the
- nuclear business. In the end, we require bill that
- stimulates economic growth and helps guarantee an
- affordable and consistent energy supply for
- Americans.

and how do you find something affordable with out employement?
If you dont subsidize big businesses how are they going to maintain employement opportunities for the people?

What we don't need is a special-interest
- banquet that picks the pockets of taxpayers.

Like the Democratic party?




-
-






The beatings will stop when morale improves.
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<Guest>
Posted
Hornet57 wrote:
- If you dont subsidize big businesses how are they
- going to maintain employement opportunities for the
- people?


How about off their own massive profits?



.Wit
Ubi Soft/RSE Forum Moderator
<embed src="http://www.tacticaladvantage.com/sigs/blue_sig2.swf" height="90" width="276" autostart="true">
ICQ: 11353520 :: 59154659
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<Guest>
Posted
Hornet57 wrote:

- In the mean time many complain that we are going to
- Iraq for their oil. You just cant win.

That may be the case for some, but I personally never stated here at the forum that the US attacked Iraq solely for the purpose of securing their oil reserves. Sure it may be one of the reasons, but there are undoubtedly many others, which as you know have already been repeatedly disgusted here at the forum on various occasions.

- Yesturday I caught the end of this report about
- windmill farms offshore to generate power out and
- there are the rich and famous that think it will be
- too unsightly since they will be able to see it
- through their highpowered binoculars.
- Maybe if we can hang a nice powder blue curtain
- could solve the problem.

Yeah, well there is technology out there that can literally turn garbage or any carbon based waste into oil and gas, yet the petroleum industry refuses embrace it because they claim drilling for energy is much cheaper. The odd thing is the city of Philadelphia doesn't seem to think so and already have setup a facility it plans to use in order to turn its treated sewage into fuel oil.
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<Guest>
Posted
Hornet, you appear to be caught in a contradiction. You criticize welfare for the poor while lauding it for the rich. At least be consistent and say if welfare (subsidies) are wrong for one group in society they are wrong for everyone.




"The statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." - Mark Twain, 1917
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2 3 4  
 

ubi.com    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Rainbow Six  Hop To Forums  Rainbow Six Off Topic    Al-Qaeda Claims Responsibility for Power Outtage