I'm sure most of you have all played the Turok Demo here .. Or perhaps TimeShift??
Now this is all the proof you need that IGN is ****ing retarded ...
Turok - 7/10 TimeShift - 7.6/10 The Darkness - 7.7/10 BlackSite: Area 51 - 6.4/10
These are two of the crappiest games I have ever played in the longest time .. Now IGN is trying to tell us that Haze is TWICE as worse as these TWO games??? Are you ****ing KIDDING ME?
Are you trying to tell me that .. THE DARKNESS (7.7) is TWICE as good as HAZE?!? I ACTUALLY PLAYED the DARKNESS .. That is the worst game I have EVER played in my life.
HAVE you PLAYED BlackSite:Area 51 ...????? That game got a 6.4?!?!?!? Are you TRYING to tell me that BLACKSITE is better than Haze??? Wow ...
Where ever IGN is getting their money from .. they really need to stop before people stop going to their website.
i understand where your comin from and i do agree ign isnt to be trusted...but unfortunatly now its not just them... im starting to see poor reviews comin from everywhere, ign, kotaku, GCHD, gamespot, and x-play.
apparently this game just doesnt shape up the way it was meant to....and its a real shame... i was REALLY lookin forward to another game with splitscreen co-op
Am buying this game no matter what and I dont give a **** of any rating the reviewers give because this is best and greatest game that I like and been waiting for, for a long time.
wow, why are people crying so hard? no one is givving haze a good review. no one. are you going to post past scores from all the other sites as well? try to discredit them all?
why is it so hard to accept that some games just arent great? if you have fun with a bad game, then what else matters? i love plenty of games that suck, but i dont act as if a **** game i like becomes good just because i like it.
so reviwers dont like a game you do (or you assume you do, as its not out yet), it doesnt mean you cant enjoy it, and it doesnt mean you have to throw a hissey fit.
I remember that The Darkness got a 9/10 and I hated it, only played the first level. I don't care about the ratings, I've heard its good with multiplayer so I'm going to throw my LAN Party.
Originally posted by trophix1: Am buying this game no matter what and I dont give a **** of any rating the reviewers give because this is best and greatest game that I like and been waiting for, for a long time.
thats fine, your entitled to your opinion same as the reviewers are entitled to theirs...but honestly if a game isnt good your not going to change that by trying to discredit the reviewers and the act of doing so is honestly just childish
Originally posted by R.E.Facade: wow, why are people crying so hard? no one is givving haze a good review. no one. are you going to post past scores from all the other sites as well? try to discredit them all?
why is it so hard to accept that some games just arent great? if you have fun with a bad game, then what else matters? i love plenty of games that suck, but i dont act as if a **** game i like becomes good just because i like it.
so reviwers dont like a game you do (or you assume you do, as its not out yet), it doesnt mean you cant enjoy it, and it doesnt mean you have to throw a hissey fit.
Famitsu and PSM Italy apparantly disagree with you.
Either way I don't care about reviews and will still be buying Haze.
Some of these sites have given wiifit 80/100. I'm sorry but that discredits them completely. A bathroom scale is not fun, is not a game, is not deserving of 1/100 let alone more than Haze.
I'm sorry but I don't trust reviewers more than I trust FRD. I've been a fan of every game they've ever done. I have not agreed with most reviews.
Originally posted by R.E.Facade: famitsu is jap, so they dont know shooters from pea soup, and psm italy is an official sony mag in the middle of nowhere. we can make a million excuses, but you just have to accept that haze just might be a sub par game. theres no shame in that
quote:
Originally posted by R.E.Facade: wow, why are people crying so hard? no one is givving haze a good review. no one. are you going to post past scores from all the other sites as well? try to discredit them all?
The supporters aren't the only ones trying to discredit reviewers
Honestly, the reviews I've read of Haze seem overly nit-picky and just hammer on the little things rather than giving a good cross-section of the game. If we're going to do that, I suppose I should say I dislike GTA4 because the radio stations don't have enough on them. 4.0 for sure on that game. Definitely. Fo' Realz.
Still excited for the game, just gotta hope I can con someone into getting it for my birthday >.<
anyone whos familiar with famitsu knows theyre clueless when it comes to shooters, and psm uk gave it a 7, unlike the 9 italy gave it. theyre both official sony mags reviewing a sony exclusive. 2+2=4.
nobody gave a f*** about famitsu or psm italy before now, so dont act as if theyre the highest court in gamedom because they gave haze a good score. you dont even know what those reviews said because theyre not in english. all you know is the numeric score they gave, but i guess thats enough to sway you.
bottom line, its getting bad reviews. its got a metascore of 54 right now. i guess thats not the number you wanted, but who cares about metascore when psm italy gave it a 9!!!!!!
its a mediocre game. buy it, play and enjoy it for what it is, and stop whining about the bad reviews. so what if its mediocre, if youre gonna play it, then play it. no sense in crying over something you cant change, you can only make the best of what youre given
I dont care about reviews. It was a little sad to see it get reviewed so low, but im still getting it tomorrow. Im really buying the game for the online and thats about it. I dont think any of those sites have reviewed the online multiplayer aspect.
The only thing that matters is if YOU like a game. Personally, I would give Haze a 8.5/10, only because Capture the Flag and something like Warfare from UT3. Also, a few more vehicles.
Topic Closed
