OK i am going to start this out a little... i don't know what to call it. I am going to state my honest opinion, and i would like you guys to do the same. Halo compared to Resistance graphics and no comparison. Resistance won... in my opinion at least, but do you think Haze can compare with Resistance? I like Haze's graphics but i do not think it can compare to Resistance... AND that is my honest opinion.
Please tell me what you think, and once again give me your honest opinion because i am sure that there are some people that feel the same way as me!
You know, i don't actually know just yet. I can't go off of the screen shots, cuz there from an on going build of the final retail product. Like a day or two after i've had time enough to really take a look. I could honestly compare though.
And i agree with you 100% resistance's graphics owned halo 3's and i don't even have a HD tv or connection.
I think haze looks awesome, way better that any game on the market. does it look better than resistance, I dont know and I dont care. resistance is resistance and haze well its haze. I like the way haze look, the graphical style and most of all the way everything falls together. the weapons design is just nuts, Im really impressed with that. the mantel armor design is great too. Thats the thing with this generation, pretty much every games looks good in its own way. You cant really compare resistance with halo, its not the same style. as for me, call of duty 4 looks realistic but I dont like it. Im looking for a creative work, games are a piece of art, everything should be created from ground up. games like call of duty, ghost recon, rainbow six vegas just look like a copy of what already exist. where is the creative work in that. thats the thing with frd, they create everything, just look at the timesplitters series. Haze is my top game for 2008, no doubt about it.
If you're going to start talking about graphical comparisons, remember that there are several aspects to graphics, the main ones being the quality of the graphics engine, and the overall design. On top of that you have things like frame-rate, texture quality, etc, but don't forget Haze isn't finished yet and we've seen no gameplay video since last year, so be carfeul in your comparisons.
IMO Haze looks a lot better than Resistance though, but then it should - Resistance is 18 months old.
Haze FAQ - please check first if you have a question about Haze.
I agree with deded, I'm sure it will have better graphics than resistance because resistance was a launch title, and was released a while back now. I think that Haze will have good graphics, i would reckon they will be similar to UT3.
Well, from what I've seen so far, Haze does look better. It'd be pretty safe to assume then, that the final product will look equally as good, if not more. But, it's not really a requirement that it's breaking ground in visual quality...only that the gameplay and story are solid... But, that's just me =)
And i agree with you 100% resistance's graphics owned halo 3's and i don't even have a HD tv or connection.
Really? I thought Halo 3 kind of had better graphics although it was a less realistic art style. But I HAVE only played the demo for resistance and one mission seemed worse and the other mission seemed to have better graphics. This game has good graphics, and it looks FUNNNN. any word on a demo? can we have one, like, NOW?!
Originally posted by Osirisox: There is some new footage from the Play.com showing.
Its been shown that the game is running at 30 FPS and dropping down to around 22- 27 when climactic events such as explosions occur.
Hopefully it will run smoothly in spite of this.
(for reference, COD4 runs at approximately 60 FPS)
The human eye can't actually tell the difference once you get above 30 fps. Higher FPS just allows you to get a better sense of speed and that stuff, look at burnout compared to other racing games. This IS pre-release so any framerate problems should be fixed by the time we get it.
You have a good point there, with games being there own and what not. But then again some people like having a game that's a copy of what really exists. Keep in mind, art is subjective. What's good to you maybe **** to someone else though.
I agree with you all lol. I know the game engine can change everything and all, but i just like games with really great graphics, and that is why i bought a ps3, and not just keep my old ps2. I like smooth gameplay, i like great cut scenes or what ever they are called lol. I do not like playing a game that already exists, and that is why i am looking forward to Haze, but i hope you guys understand my feelings!. A question though, what are fps and why cant we see over 60.
Keep your opinions coming, i am really enjoying them!
Ya, we can't actually see LAG when it's above 30 fps but when it gets below 30 is when we get "the slideshow effect." We use higher than that mainly to get a sense of speed.
oh by the way you are wrong when you say the human eye can't detect anything above 30. its actually anything above 60. moron.
EDIT: Abusing other members is unnecessary, against the rules of the forum and will not be tolerated, cod4pwns08 - you wouldn't expect it from others, so don't do it yourself.
This message has been edited. Last edited by: deded999,
Originally posted by cod4pwns08: oh by the way you are wrong when you say the human eye can't detect anything above 30. its actually anything above 60. moron.
Geez was the hostility necessary? Seriously, this is a community, if someone's wrong politely inform them, there's no need name calling, quite frankly its a little childish.
Nah, I was going by something someone told me. You are somewhat correct, however, Crrato had it spot on. 72fps is recommended to force the illusion of reality.
